Historical Background and Evolution in Male Sling Surgery

Chapter

Abstract

It is estimated that approximately 22.6 million men are affected by urinary incontinence and 8.2 million have moderate to severe incontinence [1]. Pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) accounts for only a subset (12.5%) of these patients, yet it remains a substantial problem. In the era of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, the incidence of 12 months of urinary incontinence varies between 4 and 31%. Of these, only 6–9% of men are bothered enough to elect surgical treatment for their incontinence [2, 3]. There has been an evolution in the surgical procedures for the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence over the years. Only few show promise and continue to be in use at present time. Male sling procedures remain a alternative option for mild to moderate incontinence while artificial urinary sphincter continues to enjoy its gold standard status.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author wants to acknowledge Dirk Schultheiss, M.D., Chairman, History Office, European Association of Urology (EAU), for the resource provided in “A Brief History of Urinary Incontinence and its Treatment.”

References

  1. 1.
    Markland AD, Goode PS, Redden DT, Borrud LG, Burgio KL. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1022–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nam RK, Herschorn S, Loblaw DA, Liu Y, Klotz LH, Carr LK, et al. Population based study of long term rates of surgery for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188:502–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalona WJ. Potency, continence, and complications in 3477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004;172:2227–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Young HH. An operation for the cure of incontinence of urine. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1919;28:84–90.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Squier JB. Post-operative urinary incontinence: urethroplastic operation. Med Rec. 1911;79:868.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deming CL. Transplantation of the gracilis muscle for incontinence of urine. JAMA. 1926;86:822–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lowsley OS. New operations for the relief of incontinence in both male and female. J Urol. 1936;36:400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verges-Flaque A. Flaque-Lowsley operation for urinary incontinence: preliminary report. J Urol. 1951;65:427–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaufman JJ. A new operation for male incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;131:295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berry JL. A new procedure for correction of urinary incontinence: preliminary report. J Urol. 1961;85:771–3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauri D. A new operation for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Urol Int. 1977;32:284–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaufman JJ. Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence: use of the penile crura to compress the bulbous urethra. J Urol. 1972;107:293–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaufman JJ. Treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence using a silicone gel prosthesis. Br J Urol. 1973;45:646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schaeffer AJ, Clemens JQ, Ferrari M, Stamey TA. The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 1998;159:1510–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stern JA, Clemens JQ, Tiplitsky SI, Matschke HM, Jain PM, Schaeffer AJ. Long term results of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol. 2005;173:1654–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cunningham JH. The diagnosis of the stricture of the urethra by the roentgen rays. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1910;5:369.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foley FEB. An artificial sphincter: a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1947;58:250–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosen M. A simple artificial implantable sphincter. Br J Urol. 1976;48:675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jonas U. Operative Behandlung der mannlichen Sphinkterinsuffizienz: Experimente Zur Entwicklung eines neuartigen alloplastischen Sphinkters. Aktuelle Urol. 1984;15:280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology. 1973;1:252–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singla A. Bone anchored male sling (BAMS). In: Singla A, editor. Post prostatectomy incontinence – a clinical guide. Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2013. p. 66.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madjar S, Jacoby K, Giberti C, Wald M, Halachmi S, Issaq E, et al. Bone anchored sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2001;165:72–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Comiter CV. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study. J Urol. 2002;167:97–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Onur R, Rajpurkar A, Singla A. New perineal bone anchored male sling: lessons learned. Urology. 2004;64(1):58–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castle E, Andrews P, Itano N, et al. The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Mean follow up of 18 months. J Urol. 2005;173:1657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajpurkar AD, Onur R, Singla A. Patient satisfaction and clinical efficacy of the new perineal bone-anchored male sling. Eur Urol. 2005;47:237–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carmel M, Hage B, Hanna S, Schmutz G, Tu LM. Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2010;106:1012–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lanoe M, Saussine C, Mouracade P, et al. Male stress urinary incontinence by InVance™ bone anchored sub-urethral sling: predictive factors of treatment failure: multicentric study by the CTMH-AFU. Prog Urol. 2009;19:839–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singla AK, Aggarwal N. Bone anchored male sling in the management of post prostatectomy incontinence-five year experience from single institution. J Urol. 2007;177(4 suppl):441.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fischer MC, Huckabay C, Nitti VW. The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome. J Urol. 2007;177:1414–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Comiter CV. The male perineal sling: Intermediate-term results. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:648–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:860–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rehder P, Freiin von Gleissenthall G, Pichler R, Glodny B. The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (AdVance): lessons learnt from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol. 2009;62:860–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    De Ridder D, Rehder P. The advance male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10:383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Comiter CV, Nitti V, Elliott C, Rhee E. A new quadratic sling for male stress incontinence: retrograde leak point pressure as a measure of urethral resistance. J Urol. 2012;187:563–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Comiter CV, Rhee EY. “the ventral urethral elevation plus” sling: a novel approach to treating stress urinary incontinence in men. BJU Int. 2008;101:187–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Romano SV, Metrebian SE, Vaz F, et al. An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase lll multicentre trial. BJU Int. 2006;97:533–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sousa-Escandon A, Cabrera J, Mantovani F, Moretti M, Ioanidis E, Kondelidis N, et al. Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1473–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Comiter CV, Dobberfuhl AD. The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: which patient should get which procedure? Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:3–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu JS, Hofer MD, Milose J, et al. Male sling and artificial urethral sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence among certifying American urologists. Urology. 2016;87:95–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lastra S, Malaeb BS. National trends in the use of surgical procedures for post-prostatectomy incontinence. AUA News. 2016;21(10):11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations