Advertisement

Use of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter in the Management of Post-prostatectomy Incontinence

Chapter

Abstract

Despite advances in surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy, post-prostatectomy incontinence affects many men and can have a large impact on quality of life. Many treatments options are available for this condition, ranging from pelvic floor physical therapy to male urethral sling insertion or artificial urinary sphincter placement. In cases of severe incontinence, prior pelvic radiation therapy or previous failed urethral sling placement, implanting an artificial urinary sphincter is typically preferred. Here, we review the preoperative considerations, operative technique, postoperative outcomes, and potential complications of artificial urinary sphincter placement.

Keywords

Post-prostatectomy incontinence Urinary incontinence Male Artificial urinary sphincter Urethral sling Revision Outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS. Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology. 2015;86(3):602–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1974;112(1):75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Savage C, Maschino AC, Lowrance WT, Sandhu JS. Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists. J Urol. 2012;188(1):205–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence–what do patients choose? J Urol. 2009;181(3):1231–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliott DS, Barrett DM, Gohma M, Boone TB. Does nocturnal deactivation of the artificial urinary sphincter lessen the risk of urethral atrophy? Urology. 2001;57(6):1051–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biardeau X, Aharony S, Group AUSC, Campeau L, Corcos J. Overview of the 2015 ICS consensus conference. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(4):437–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ziegelmann MJ, Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Viers BR, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement in octogenarians. Int J Urol. 2016;23(5):419–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O'Connor RC, Nanigian DK, Patel BN, Guralnick ML, Ellision LM, Stone AR. Artificial urinary sphincter placement in elderly men. Urology. 2007;69(1):126–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jura YH, Comiter CV. Urodynamics for postprostatectomy incontinence: when are they helpful and how do we use them? Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(3):419–27. viiiCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henry GD, Graham SM, Cornell RJ, Cleves MA, Simmons CJ, Vakalopoulos I, et al. A multicenter study on the perineal versus penoscrotal approach for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: cuff size and control of male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2404–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yeung LL, Grewal S, Bullock A, Lai HH, Brandes SB. A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2013;189(1):136–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and “no touch” surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79(6):1310–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, Webster GD. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2075–8. discussion 9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magera Jr JS, Elliott DS. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results. J Urol. 2007;177(3):1015–9. discussion 9–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O'Connor RC, Gerber GS, Avila D, Chen AA, Bales GT. Comparison of outcomes after single or DOUBLE-CUFF artificial urinary sphincter insertion. Urology. 2003;62(4):723–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O'Connor RC, Lyon MB, Guralnick ML, Bales GT. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2008;71(1):90–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Linder BJ, Viers BR, Ziegelmann MJ, Rivera ME, Rangel L, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter mechanical failures: is it better to replace the entire device or just the malfunctioning component? J Urol. 2016;195(5):1523–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leon P, Chartier-Kastler E, Roupret M, Ambrogi V, Mozer P, Phe V. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2014;115(6):951–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1242–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS, Butler EB, Boone TB. Thirteen years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007;177(3):1021–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol. 2000;164(3 Pt 1):702–6. discussion 6–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Linder BJ, de Cogain M, Elliott DS. Long-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection. J Urol. 2014;191(3):734–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S, Faerber GJ, McGuire EJ, Latini JM. Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1912–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Viers BR, Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS. Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes among primary and secondary artificial urinary sphincter implantations in men with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2016;195:e1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leon P, Chartier-Kastler E, Roupret M, Ambrogi V, Mozer P, Phe V. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2015;115(6):951–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gomha MA, Boone TB. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy: a risk and outcome analysis. J Urol. 2002;167(2 Pt 1):591–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rivera ME, Linder BJ, Ziegelmann MJ, Viers BR, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. The impact of prior radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter device survival. J Urol. 2015;195:1033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sathianathen NJ, McGuigan SM, Moon DA. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient. BJU Int. 2014;113(4):636–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ravier E, Fassi-Fehri H, Crouzet S, Gelet A, Abid N, Martin X. Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2015;115(2):300–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bates AS, Martin RM, Terry TR. Complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2015;116(4):623–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gomes CM, Broderick GA, Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Preate Jr D, Rovner ES, Wein AJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of prior collagen injection on cost and clinical outcome. J Urol. 2000;163(1):87–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lai HH, Boone TB. Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases–how do they fare compared to virgin cases? J Urol. 2012;187(3):951–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raj GV, Peterson AC, Webster GD. Outcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2006;175(6):2186–90. discussion 90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brant WO, Erickson BA, Elliott SP, Powell C, Alsikafi N, McClung C, et al. Risk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters: a multicenter prospective study. Urology. 2014;84(4):934–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Godwin CA, Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS. Effects of Smoking Status on Device Survival Among Individuals Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement. Am J Mens Health. With press 2016 May 29.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soljanik I, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Repeat retrourethral transobturator sling in the management of recurrent postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence after failed first male sling. Eur Urol. 2010;58(5):767–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ajay D, Zhang H, Gupta S, Selph JP, Belsante MJ, Lentz AC, et al. The artificial urinary sphincter is superior to a secondary transobturator male sling in cases of a primary sling failure. J Urol. 2015;194(4):1038–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lentz AC, Peterson AC, Webster GD. Outcomes following artificial sphincter implantation after prior unsuccessful male sling. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2149–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abdou A, Cornu JN, Sebe P, Ciofu C, Peyrat L, Cussenot O, et al. Salvage therapy with artificial urinary sphincter after advance male sling failure for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a first clinical experience. Prog Urol. 2012;22(11):650–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fisher MB, Aggarwal N, Vuruskan H, Singla AK. Efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter implantation after failed bone-anchored male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2007;70(5):942–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tuygun C, Imamoglu A, Gucuk A, Goktug G, Demirel F. Comparison of outcomes for adjustable bulbourethral male sling and artificial urinary sphincter after previous artificial urinary sphincter erosion. Urology. 2009;73(6):1363–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tuygun C, Imamoglu A, Keyik B, Alisir I, Yorubulut M. Significance of fibrosis around and/or at external urinary sphincter on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in patients with postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2006;68(6):1308–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Linder BJ, Piotrowski JT, Ziegelmann MJ, Rivera ME, Rangel LJ, Elliott DS. Perioperative complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement. J Urol. 2015;194(3):716–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Seideman CA, Zhao LC, Hudak SJ, Mierzwiak J, Adibi M, Morey AF. Is prolonged catheterization a risk factor for artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion? Urology. 2013;82(4):943–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Martins FE, Boyd SD. Post-operative risk factors associated with artificial urinary sphincter infection-erosion. Br J Urol. 1995;75(3):354–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Magera Jr JS, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter infection: causative organisms in a contemporary series. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2475–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Petrou SP, Williams HJ, Young PR. Radiographic imaging of the artificial urinary sphincter pressure regulating balloon. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1773–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brucker BM, Demirtas A, Fong E, Kelly C, Nitti VW. Artificial urinary sphincter revision: the role of ultrasound. Urology. 2013;82(6):1424–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maillet F, Buzelin JM, Bouchot O, Karam G. Management of artificial urinary sphincter dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2004;46(2):241–5. discussion 6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Artificial urinary sphincter troubleshooting. Urology. 2001;58(5):779–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peterson AC, Webster GD. Artificial urinary sphincter: lessons learned. Urol Clin North Am. 2011;38(1):83–8. viiCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Saffarian A, Walsh K, Walsh IK, Stone AR. Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement: is cuff downsizing effective? J Urol. 2003;169(2):567–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Webster GD, Sherman ND. Management of male incontinence following artificial urinary sphincter failure. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15(6):386–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations