Advertisement

A Simulation-Based Optimization Analysis of Retail Outlet Ordering Policies and Vendor Minimum Purchase Requirements in a Distribution System

  • Gerald W. Evans
  • Gail W. DePuy
  • Aman GuptaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents an approach involving both discrete event simulation (DES) and optimization to address operational problems faced by a distribution system. In the system modeled, vendors may require minimum purchase requirements for each order. The model can be used to determine whether retail outlets should order product directly from the vendors, or through a centralized warehouse, as well as whether each retail outlet should violate its pre-specified inventory policy in order to meet vendor-minimum requirements. In addition, the model can be of use as an aid in negotiation with vendors with respect to minimum purchase requirements. The work is based on a project performed for an actual company with a centralized warehouse, located in Louisville, Kentucky, and 19 retail outlets, located throughout the United States.

Keywords

Inventory policy Simulation Optimization Distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded from a contract received through the Center for Engineering Logistics and Distribution (CELDi), a multi-university, multi-disciplinary National Science Foundation sponsored Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC). The authors also acknowledge (1) the aid of two former graduate students from the Department of Industrial Engineering at the University of Louisville: Maria Chiodi and Elizabeth Forney, and (2) the helpful suggestions of anonymous referees.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdul-Jalbar, B., Gutierrez, J. M., & Sicilia, J. (2009). A two-echelon inventory/distribution system with power demand pattern and backorders. International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 519–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albino, V., Carbonara, N., & Giannoccaro, I. (2007). Supply chaín cooperation in industrial districts: A simulation analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 261–280.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    April, J., Glover, F., Kelly, J. P., & Laguna, M. (2003). Practical introduction to simulation optimization. In S. Chick, P. J. Sánchez, D. Ferrin & D. J. Morrice (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 71–78). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arns, M., Fischer, M., Kemper, P., & Tepper, C. (2002). Supply chain modeling and its analytical evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(8), 885–894.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Axsater, S. (2000). Simple solution procedure for a class of two-echelon inventory problems. Operations Research, 38(1), 64–69.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boute, R. N., Disney, S. M., Lambrecht, M. R., & Van Houdt, B. (2009). Designing replenishment rules in a two-echelon supply chain with a flexible or an inflexible capacity strategy. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(1), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, Y., Mockus, L., Orcun, S., & Reklaitis, G. V. (2012). Simulation-optimization approach to clinical trial supply chain management with demand scenario forecast. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 40, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, L.-H., & Kang, F. S. (2007). Integrated vendor-buyer cooperative inventory models with variant permissible delay in payments. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 658–673.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, T. C. E., & Wu, Y. N. (2005). The impact of information sharing in a two-level supply chain with multiple retailers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(10), 1159–1165.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chu, Y., You, F., Wassick, J. M., & Agarwal, A. (2015). Simulation-based optimization framework for multi-echelon inventory systems under uncertainty. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 73, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crnkovic, J., Tayi, G. K., & Ballou, D. P. (2008). A decision support framework for exploring supply chain tradeoffs. International Journal of Production Economics, 115, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eruguz, A. S., Sahin, E., Jemai, Z., & Dallery, Y. (2016). A comprehensive survey of guaranteed-service models for multi-echelon inventory optimization. International Journal of Production Economics, 172, 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fang, D. J., & Li, C. (2014). Simulation-based hybrid approach to robust multi-echelon inventory policies for complex distribution networks. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 13(3), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Güller, M., Uygun, Y., & Noche, B. (2015). Simulation-based optimization for a capacitated multi-echelon production-inventory system. Journal of Simulation, 9(4), 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayya, J. C., Harrison, T. P., & Chatfield, D. C. (2009). A solution for the intractable inventory model when both demand and lead time are stochastic. International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holweg, M., & Bicheno, J. (2002). Supply chain simulation-a tool for education, enhancement and endeavor. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hung, W. Y., Kucherenko, S., Samsatli, N. J., & Shah, N. (2004). A flexible and generic approach to dynamic modeling of supply chains. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(8), 801–813.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jain, S. (2004). Supply chain management tradeoffs analysis. In R. G. Ingalls, M. D. Rosetti, J. S. Smith & B. A. Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 1358–1364). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jansen, D. R., van Weeen, A., Beulens, A. J. M., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2001). Simulation model of multi-compartment distribution in the catering supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(1), 210–224.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katsaliaki, K., & Brailsford, S. C. (2007). Using simulation to improve the blood supply chain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(2), 219–227.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelton, W. D., Sadowski, R. P., & Swets, N. B. (2010). Simulation with arena (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khouja, M. (2003). Synchronization in supply chains: Implications for design and management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(9), 984–994.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kochel, P., & Nielander, U. (2005). Simulation-based optimisation of multi-echelon inventory systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 93–94, 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miranda, P. A., & Garrido, R. A. (2009). Inventory service–level optimization within distribution network design problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 276–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neale, J. J., & Willems, S. P. (2009). Managing inventory in supply chains with nonstationary demand. Interfaces, 39(5), 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ng, C. T., Li, L. Y. O., & Chakhlevitch, K. (2001). Coordinated replinishments with alternative supply sources in two-level supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 73, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pedrielli, G., Alfieri, A., & Matta, A. (2015). Integrated simulation–optimisation of pull control systems. International Journal of Production Research, 53(14), 4317–4336.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Persson, F., & Araldi, M. (2009). The development of a dynamic supply chain analysis tool-integration of SCOR and discrete event simulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 121, 574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Persson, F., & Olhager, J. (2002). Performance simulation of supply chain designs. International Journal of Production Economics, 77, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosen, S. L., Harmonosky, C. M., & Traband, M. T. (2007). A simulation optimization method that considers uncertainty and multiple performance measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 315–330.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shin, H., & Benton, W. C. (2007). A quantity discount approach to supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 601–616.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Son, J. Y., & Sheu, C. (2008). The impact of replenishment policy deviations in a decentralized supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 785–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Supply Chain Council (2011). Retrieved July 8, 2011, from http://www.supply-chain.org.
  35. 35.
    Tannock, J., Cao, B., Farr, R., & Byrne, M. (2007). Data-driven simulation of the supply-chain—Insights from the aerospace sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 110(1), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tee, Y. S., & Rossetti, M. D. (2002). A robustness study of a multi-echelon inventory model via simulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 80, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tsai, S. C., & Zheng, Y. X. (2013). A simulation optimization approach for a two-echelon inventory system with service level constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 364–374.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wagner, S. M., & Friedl, G. (2007). Supplier switching decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 700–717.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Decision SciencesEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University - WorldwideDaytona BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations