Advertisement

Improving Airport Performance Through a Model-Based Analysis and Optimization Approach

  • M. Mujica MotaEmail author
  • P. Scala
  • D. Delahaye
Chapter

Abstract

Traditionally airport systems have been studied using an approach in which the different elements of the system are studied independently. Until recently scientific community has put attention in developing models and techniques that study the system using holistic approaches for understanding cause and effect relationships of the integral system. This chapter presents a case of an airport in which the authors have implemented an approach for improving the turnaround time of the operation. The novelty of the approach is that it uses a combination of simulation, parameter analysis and optimization for getting to the best amount of vehicles that minimize the turnaround time of the airport under study. In addition, the simulation model is such that it includes the most important elements within the aviation system, such as terminal manoeuvring area, runway, taxi networks, and ground handling operation. The results show clearly that the approach is suitable for a complex system in which the amount of variables makes it intractable for getting good solutions in reasonable time.

Keywords

Turnaround Time Discrete Event Simulation Recede Horizon Control Recede Horizon Control Congestion Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Arias, P., Guimarans, D., Boosten, G., & Mujica, M. (2013). A methodology combining optimization and simulation for real applications of the stochastic aircraft recovery problem’. In Proceedings of the EUROSIM’13, Cardiff, U.K.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balakrishnan, H., & Chandran, B. (2010). Algorithms for scheduling runway operations under constrained position shifting. Operations Research, 58(6), 1650–1665.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beasley, J. E., Krishnamoorthy, M., Sharaiha, Y. M., & Abramson, D. (2000). Scheduling aircraft landings—the static case. Transportation Science, 180–197.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beasley, J. E., Krishnamoorthy, M., SharaihaY, M., & Abramson, D. (2004). Displacement problem and dynamically scheduling aircraft landings’. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 54–64.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beasley, J. E., Sonander, J., & Havelock, P. (2001). Scheduling aircraft landings at London Heathrow using a population heuristic. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 483–493.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bolat, A. (2000). Procedures for providing robust gate assignments for arriving aircrafts. European Journal of Operational Research, 120(1), 63–80.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeNeufville, R., & Scholtes, S. (2011). Flexibility in engineering design. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorndorf, U., Drexlb, A., Nikulin, Y., & Peschc, E. (2007). Flight gate scheduling: State-of-the-art and recent developments. Omega, 35(3), 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eurocontrol. (2013). Challenges of growth 2013. Technical report.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eurocontrol. (2016, December). Coda Report: All-causes Delay to Air Transport in Europe. Technical report.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eurocontrol. (2015). Industry Monitor, Issue N 174. 01/07/2015.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Federov, V. V. (1972). Theory of optimal experiments. In W. J. Studden & E. M. Klimko (Eds). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu, X., & Chen, W. (2005). Receding horizon control for aircraft arrival sequencing and scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6(2).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jimenez, E. (2014). Airport strategic planning in the context of low-cost carriers ascendency: insights from the European experience. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad do Porto.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khadilkar, H., & Balakrishnan, H. (2014). Network congestion control of airport surface operations. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 7(3), 933–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Longo, F. (2013). On the short period production planning in industrial plants: A real case study. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 8, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michelin, A., Idan, M., & Speyer, J. L. (2009). Merging of air traffic flows. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 10–13, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mujica, M. (2015). Check-in allocation improvements through the use of a simulation-optimization approach. Transportation Research Part A, 320–335.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mujica, M., de Bock, N., Boosten, G., Jimenez, E., & Pinho, J. (2015). Simulation-based turnaround evaluation for Lelystad airport. In Air Transport Research Society World Conference, 2–5 July, Singapore.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murca, M. C. R., & Müller, C. (2015). Control-based optimization approach for aircraft scheduling in a terminal area with alternative arrival routes. Transportation Research Part E, 73, 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Narciso, M. E., & Piera, M. A. (2015). Robust gate assignment procedures from an airport management perspective. Omega, 50, 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Pujet, N., Delcaire, B., & Feron, E. (1999). Input-output modeling and control of the departure process of congested airports. In A collection of technical papers: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Part 3 (pp. 1835–1852), 9–11 August, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scala, P., Mujica, M., & Zuniga, C. A. (2015). Assessing the future TMA capacity of Lelystad airport using simulation. In Air Transport and Operations Symposium, 20–22 July, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scala, P., Mujica, M., & De Bock, N. (2015). Modular approach for modelling an airport system. In EMSS European Modeling & Simulation Symposium, 21–23 September, Bergeggi, Italy.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Schiphol Group. (2014). Ondernemingsplan Lelystad Airport, March 2014.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Simaiakis, I., & Balakrishnan, H. (2014). A queuing model of the airport departure process. Transportation Science (accepted, July 2014).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    SIMIO Web Page http://www.simio.com.
  32. 32.
    van Baren, G., & Treve, V. (2015). The current practice of separation delivery at major European airports. http://www.atmseminar.org/seminarContent/seminar11/papers/466-Van%20Baren_0126150311-Final-Paper-5-7-15.pdf.
  33. 33.
    Zuniga, C. A., Delahaye, D., & Piera, M. A. (2011). Integrating and sequencing flows in terminal maneuvering area by evolutionary algorithms. In DASC 2011, 30th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Seattle, United States.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zuniga, C. A., Piera, M. A., Ruiz, S., & Del Pozo, I. (2013). A CD & CR causal model based on path shortening/path stretching techniques. Transportation Research Part C, 33, 238–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aviation AcademyAmsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Ecole Nationale de L’Aviation CivileToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations