Abstract
Although almost 3000 km apart, the Great Caucasus at the eastern edge of Europe and the Alps in central Europe share a common young geological age, an approximative W-E orientation, they both belong to the Eurasian mountain chain that formed and is still forming as a result of southern continents pushing northwards. Using a 1000 m elevation minimum, the Great Caucasus is stretching from 41° 15′ N to 43° 45′ N (central part at 43°N) and the Alps from 44° 10′ N to 47° 40′ N (central part at 46° 30′N), with both chains belonging to the temperate zone (Fig. 1.1). In their central part, the Alps experience a stronger maritime and the Great Caucasus or more continental influence. Both ranges divide the weather systems into northern and southern climates, and both show strong precipitation gradients. In the Great Caucasus this is a NW-SE gradient, in the Alps (with some exceptions) a N-S gradient, ranging from around 2000 mm per year to less than 500 mm at places. Both mountain systems show a mass elevation effect (‘massenerhebungseffekt’), with a higher elevation of isotherms in the interior parts compared to front ranges, and a dry, step-type climate in parts of their deep central valleys. Yet, the Caucasus forms a single main divide with a series of side valleys on either side, whereas the Alps have several chains in parallel, permitting a more pronounced mass elevation effect to occur in its interior valleys. The maximum elevation is similar, with the highest peak of the Great Caucasus, Mount Elbrus 5642 m, and that of the Alps, Mont Blanc 4809 m. Yet, some of the highest peaks in the Caucasus are former volcanoes (Mount Kasbek with 5047 m, is one of them, in the core study region of this volume), whereas in the Alps, all summits are tectonic summits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Körner C (2007) The use of “altitude” in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22:569–574
Körner C (2012) Alpine treelines. Functional ecology of the global high elevation tree limits. Springer, Basel
Körner C, Paulsen J (2004) A world-wide study of high altitude treeline temperatures. J Biogeogr 31:713–732
Körner C, Paulsen J, Pelaez-Riedl S (2003) A bioclimatic characterisation of Europe’s alpine areas. In: Nagy L, Grabherr G, Körner C, DBA T (eds) Alpine biodiversity in Europe. Ecological Studies, vol 167. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–28
Körner C, Paulsen J, Spehn EM (2011) A definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparison of biodiversity data. Alp Bot 121:73–78
Paulsen J, Körner C (2014) A climate-based model to predict potential treeline position around the globe. Alp Bot 124:1–12
Scherrer D, Körner C (2009) Infra-red thermometry of alpine landscapes challenges climatic warming projections. Glob Chang Biol 16:2602–2613
Scherrer D, Körner C (2011) Topographically controlled thermal-habitat differentiation buffers alpine plant diversity against climate warming. J Biogeogr 38:406–416
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Körner, C., Paulsen, J. (2017). A Geostatistical and Bioclimatological Comparison of the Central Great Caucasus and the Central Alps. In: Nakhutsrishvili, G., Abdaladze, O., Batsatsashvili, K., Spehn, E., Körner, C. (eds) Plant Diversity in the Central Great Caucasus: A Quantitative Assessment. Geobotany Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55777-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55777-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55776-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55777-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)