Skip to main content

Framing Caesarean Section Reduction Policies Through a Dynamic Performance Management Approach: A Maternity Pathway Case-Based Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Healthcare Systems for the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

The World Health Organization since the last three decades strongly encourages countries to reduce the caesarean section (CS) rate down to 10–15%. However, this goal nowadays appears still far from its achievement. Public decision-makers are indeed struggling to design and implement effective policies to reduce the CS rate. The literature provides a wide range of factors causing a change in the CS rate, such as the patient clinical profile and the healthcare service quality provided. Maternity pathway (MP) is considered a mean through which to standardize the cares and to reduce CSs. This study investigates the MP recently introduced in Sicilian local health authorities. Based on such an analysis, an outcome-based performance management approach has been used by the authors to build a system dynamics model. Scenario simulation results reveal that such an approach may support decision-makers to learn how to design CS reduction policies. It particularly remarks the necessity to implement policies oriented to coordinate the actions undertaken by the different actors playing a crucial role in the MP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Examples of first-level pregnancy risk are <16 or >40-year-old woman, <150 cm height, cervical or vaginal infections, fetal malformation, three or more spontaneous abortions, epilepsy, etc. On the other hand, examples of second-level pregnancy risk include: vaginal bleeding, uterine malformations, uterine myomas, and the presence of pelvic mass. There are also third-level pregnancy risks—directly treated in natal centers—such as twin pregnancy, fetal growth delays, fetal malformations, diabetes, etc.

  2. 2.

    In medical science, the term “outcome” has to be intended in the Donabedian’s conceptualization, i.e., it refers to a patient’s health status or change in health status resulting from the medical care received (Donabedian 2005). This definition is oriented to analyze the post-care patient survival conditions and includes intended outcomes (e.g., the relief of pain), as well as unintended outcomes (e.g., complications).

References

  • Atwal, A., & Caldwell, K. (2002). Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration? Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 16(4), 360–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betrán, A. P., Merialdi, M., Lauer, J. A., Bing-Shun, W., Thomas, J., Van Look, P., & Wagner, M. (2007). Rates of cesarean section: Analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21, 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C. (2016). Dynamic performance management. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C., Bovaird, T. (2016). Balancing service quality and public governance principles to achieve quality-of-life outcomes through dynamic performance management. Paper presented at the International Symposium on “The Paradigm Shift from Output to Outcome Measures in the Public Sector”, Palermo, May 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, C., Bivona, E., Cognata, A., Ferrara, P., Landi, T., & Ricci, P. (2010). Applying system dynamics to foster organizational change, accountability and performance in the public sector: A case-based Italian perspective. Systems Research, 27, 395–420. doi:10.1002/sres.1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, D. J., Robson, M. S., Murphy, M., & O’Herlihy, C. (2009). Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201(308), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H., Hotchkiss, R., Bradshaw, N., & Porteous, M. (1998). Integrated care pathways. BMJ, 316(7125), 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (2005). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Quarterly, 83, 691–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dy, S. M., Garg, P., Nyberg, D., Dawson, P. B., Pronovost, P. J., Morlock, L., et al. (2005). Critical pathway effectiveness: Assessing the impact of patient, hospital care, and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 40, 499–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R., Moran, S., & MacCormick, A. (2003). Guidance for integrated care pathways: A reference document for an acute NHS trust. Journal of Integrated Care Pathways, 7, 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadegan, N., Lyneis, J., & Richardson, G. P. (2011). How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. System Dynamics Review, 27(1), 22–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadegan, N., Epstein, A. J., & Martin, E. G. (2013). Practice variation, bias, and experiential learning in cesarean delivery: A data-based system dynamics approach. Health Services Research, 48, 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, B., & Segrott, J. (2008). Re-mapping client journeys and professional identities: A review of the literature on clinical pathways. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(4), 608–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità Ministero della Salute. (2014). Sistema nazionale per le Linee Guida. Linea guida 19. Taglio Cesareo: una scelta appropriata e consapevole. (National Institute of Health Care. Ministry of Health Care. National System for the Guidelines. Guideline 19. Cesarean Section: an appropriate and conscious choice). http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1330_allegato.pdf.

  • Lane, D., & Huseman, E. (2008). System dynamics mapping of acute patient flows. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, A. J., Blondel, B., Mohangoo, A. D., Cuttini, M., Nijhuis, J., Novak, Z., Ólafsdóttir, H. S., Zeitlin, J., & the Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. (2016). Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: Risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG, 123, 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, R., Petchey, R., Shaw, S., & Carter, Y. (2005). What’s in a pathway? Towards a cultural cartography of the new NHS. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(6), 759–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, M., Hartigan, L., & Murphy, M. (2013). Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27(2), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triunfo, S., Ferrazzani, S., Lanzone, A., & Scambia, G. (2015). Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group classification in a tertiary level hospital. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 189, 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J., & Gubbels, J. (1994). Knowledge elicitation in conceptual model building: A case-study in modelling a regional Dutch health care system. In J. Morecroft & J. Sternam (Eds.), Modeling for learning (pp. 121–145). Portland: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. (1997). Will critical pathways replace the nursing process? Nursing Standard, 11(52), 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, K., Blondel, B., Nijhuis, J., Defoort, P., & Bakoula, C. (2003). European indicators of health care during pregnancy, delivery and the postpartum period. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 111, S53–S65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. (1999). A patient flow perspective of U.K. health services: Exploring the case for new ‘intermediate care’ initiatives. System Dynamics Review, 15(3), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1985). Appropriate technology for birth. The Lancet, 2, 436–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). Antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. The Lancet, 357(9268), 1551–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zizza, A., Tinelli, A., Malvasi, A., Barbone, E., Stark, M., De Donno, A., & Guido, M. (2011). Caesarean section in the world: A new ecological approach. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 52, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Bivona .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bivona, E., Cosenz, F. (2017). Framing Caesarean Section Reduction Policies Through a Dynamic Performance Management Approach: A Maternity Pathway Case-Based Analysis. In: Qudrat-Ullah, H., Tsasis, P. (eds) Innovative Healthcare Systems for the 21st Century. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55774-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics