Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Science and Art of Simulation I

Abstract

It is quite rare to witness a radical change in science—not just the advent of a new topic or a new idea, and not just a change in a single field or scientific discipline, but a transformation of the way in which science works in general. In this kind of situation, it is difficult to understand what is going on. Our perceptions are not yet accustomed the novelty; no scholarly language has been refined and developed to reflect on what’s going on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is easy to say, following Kuhn, that we are observing a paradigm shift (Kuhn 1970). In fact, it is too easy, because the scientific shift necessarily includes a corresponding shift in the philosophy of science. Kuhn’s approach establishes a different “paradigm” of observing and understanding science. Thus, both the philosophy of science and its subject are in motion. See also Winsberg’s remarks on their correlation (Winsberg 2010).

  2. 2.

    Fleck (1981) describes this challenge for scientists in detail, but it applies to philosophers and historians of science as well.

  3. 3.

    For just a few examples, see Winsberg (2010), Humphreys (2004, 2009), Lenhard (2015a, b), and Küppers and Lenhard (2006).

  4. 4.

    For a media studies perspective, see Pias (2011). For an approach based on the philosophy of technology, see Hubig (2006, 2007, 2015).

  5. 5.

    For two well-developed studies, see Gramelsberger (2008) and Beisbart (2012).

  6. 6.

    Cf. the movies Transcendence (2014) or Lucy (2014). For a more experimental approach cf. Black Mirror (2011–2016).

  7. 7.

    We owe a great debt of gratitude to Madeleine LaRue for her diligent and brilliant proofreading and Charline Medernach for her superb support in implementing the style guide.

References

  • Beisbart, Claus. 2012. How can computer simulations produce new knowledge? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3): 395–434.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Besson, Luc. 2014. Lucy. DVD. Universal City, CA: Universal Studios Home Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, Charlie, Barney Reisz, Annabel Jones, Otto Bathurst, Konnie Huq, Euros Lyn, Jesse Armstrong, et al. 2011–2016. Black mirror. TV Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik. 1981. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramelsberger, Gabriele. 2008. Computerexperimente: Zum Wandel der Wissenschaft im Zeitalter des Computers. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubig, Christoph. 2006. Technikphilosophie als Reflexion der Medialität. Vol. 1 of Die Kunst des Möglichen. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubig, Christoph. 2007. Grundlinien einer dialektischen Philosophie der Technik. Vol. 2 of Die Kunst des Möglichen. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubig, Christoph. 2015. Macht der Technik. Vol 3 of Die Kunst des Möglichen. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Paul. 2004. Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Paul. 2009. The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese 169 (3): 615–626.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Prag: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. International encyclopedia of unified science: Foundations of the unity of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küppers, Günter, and Johannes Lenhard. 2006. From Hierarchical to Network-Like Integration: A Revolution of Modeling Style in Computer-Simulation. In Simulation. Pragmatic Construction of Reality (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 25), ed. Johannes Lenhard, Günter Küppers and Terry Shinn, 89–106. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhard, Johannes. 2015a. Kann Technik die Naturgesetze verändern? In Ding und System. Jahrbuch Technikphilosophie 2015, ed. Gerhard Gamm, Petra Gehring, Christoph Hubig, Andreas Kaminski and Alfred Nordmann, 171–186. Zürich, Berlin: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhard, Johannes. 2015b. Mit allem rechnen - zur Philosophie der Computersimulation. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1988. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Perspectives. In Trust. Making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. Diego Gambetta, 94–107. New York, NY, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, Wally. 2014. Transcendence. DVD. Burbank, CA: Warner Home Video.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pias, Claus. 2011. On the Epistemology of Computer Simulation. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung 2011 (1): 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg, Eric B. 2010. Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael M. Resch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Resch, M.M., Kaminski, A., Gehring, P. (2017). Introduction. In: Resch, M., Kaminski, A., Gehring, P. (eds) The Science and Art of Simulation I . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55762-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics