Abstract
The ethical implications of medical research and clinical practice are addressed by (a) questioning the ontological presuppositions of such notions as kinds and similarity, both object-to-object and object-to-category; (b) applying this strategy to the particular case of medicine and biomedical science, with a focus on the notion of kinds of patients; and (c) suggesting a way for researchers and clinicians to take advantage of the ontological perspective, connecting creative approaches to responsible, ethical choices.
References
Ahn W, Kim NS. The causal status effect in categorization: an overview. In: Medin DL, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic; 2000.
Beebee H, Sabbarton-Leary N, editors. The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds. New York: Routledge; 2010a.
Beebee H, Sabbarton-Leary N, editors. Are psychiatric kinds real? Eur J Anal Philos. 2010b;6:11–27.
Bird A, Tobin E. Natural kinds. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 editon); 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/natural-kinds/.
Block M, Khitin L, Sade RM. Ethical process in human research published in thoracic surgery journals. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:6–12.
Cameron AC, Laskey WK, Sheldon WC. Ethical issues for invasive cardiologists: society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;61:157–62.
Campbell JK, O’Rourke M, Slater MH, editors. Carving nature at its joints: natural kinds in metaphysics and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 2011.
D’Amico TA, McKneally MF, Sade RM. Ethics in cardiothoracic surgery: a survey of surgeons’ views. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:11–3.
Dragulinescu S. Diseases as natural kinds. Theor Med Bioeth. 2010;31:347–69.
Fine K. Essence and modality. In: Tomberlin JE, editor. Philosophical perspectives 8: logic and language. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview; 1994. p. 1–16.
Hadorn DC. Kinds of patients. J Med Philos. 1997;22:567–87.
Hesslow G. Do we need a concept of disease? Theor Med Bioeth. 1993;14:1–14.
James W. In: James H, editor. Letters of William James. Boston: Atlantic Monthly; 1920.
Kant I. The critique of the power of judgment. In: Guyer P, Matthews E (editors and trans.). Oxford: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Kavarana MN, Sade RM. Ethical issues in cardiac surgery. Futur Cardiol. 2012;8:451–65.
Kripke S. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980.
LaPorte J. Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Lemoine M. Defining disease beyond conceptual analysis: an analysis of conceptual analysis in philosophy of medicine. Theor Med Bioeth. 2013;34:309–25.
Leslie SJ. Essence and natural kinds: when science meets preschooler intuition. Oxford Stud Epistemol. 2013;4:108–66.
Lowe J. A problem for a posteriori essentialism concerning natural kinds. Analysis. 2007;67:286–92.
Manzoni GM, Castelnuovo G, Compare A, Pagnini F, Essebag V, Proietti R. Psychological effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. A review of study methods. Front Psychol. 2015;6:39. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00039.
Marchetti G, Marchetti S, editors. Facts and value: the ethics and metaphysics of normativity. London: Routledge; 2016.
Putnam H. The meaning of ‘Meaning’. In: Putnam H, editor. Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1975. p. 215–71.
Putnam H. Realism with a human face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
Putnam H. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004.
Quine WV. Natural kinds. In: Quine WV, editor. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press; 1969. p. 114–38.
Rehder B, Hastie R. Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001;130:323–60.
Reznek L. The nature of disease. New York: Routledge; 1987.
Riggs PJ, editor. Natural kinds, laws of nature and scientific methodology. Dordrecht: Springer; 1996.
Roy IC. The nature of natural kinds: natural kinds in biology and medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1998.
Sade RM, Williams T, Haney C, Perlman D, Stroud M. The ethics gap in surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:326–9.
Schwartz P. Decision and discovery in defining ‘Disease’. In: Kincaid IH, McKitrick J, editors. Establishing medical reality. Essays in the metaphysics and epistemology of biomedical science. Amsterdam: Springer; 2007. p. 47–63.
Sulmasy DP. Diseases and natural kinds. Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26:487–513.
Valore P. Fundamentals of ontological commitment. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2016.
Husserl, E. Logical Investigations. Volume 1 and 2. Translated by J. N. Findlay, with a new Preface by M. Dummett and edited with a new Introduction by D. Moran. New York: Routledge; 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valore, P. (2017). Natural Kinds, Similarity, and Individual Cases: Ontological Presuppositions and Ethical Implications. In: Proietti, R., Manzoni, G., Pietrabissa, G., Castelnuovo, G. (eds) Psychological, Emotional, Social and Cognitive Aspects of Implantable Cardiac Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55721-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55721-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55719-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55721-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)