Skip to main content

Natural Kinds, Similarity, and Individual Cases: Ontological Presuppositions and Ethical Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychological, Emotional, Social and Cognitive Aspects of Implantable Cardiac Devices

Abstract

The ethical implications of medical research and clinical practice are addressed by (a) questioning the ontological presuppositions of such notions as kinds and similarity, both object-to-object and object-to-category; (b) applying this strategy to the particular case of medicine and biomedical science, with a focus on the notion of kinds of patients; and (c) suggesting a way for researchers and clinicians to take advantage of the ontological perspective, connecting creative approaches to responsible, ethical choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahn W, Kim NS. The causal status effect in categorization: an overview. In: Medin DL, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beebee H, Sabbarton-Leary N, editors. The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds. New York: Routledge; 2010a.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beebee H, Sabbarton-Leary N, editors. Are psychiatric kinds real? Eur J Anal Philos. 2010b;6:11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bird A, Tobin E. Natural kinds. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 editon); 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/natural-kinds/.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Block M, Khitin L, Sade RM. Ethical process in human research published in thoracic surgery journals. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:6–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron AC, Laskey WK, Sheldon WC. Ethical issues for invasive cardiologists: society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;61:157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell JK, O’Rourke M, Slater MH, editors. Carving nature at its joints: natural kinds in metaphysics and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Amico TA, McKneally MF, Sade RM. Ethics in cardiothoracic surgery: a survey of surgeons’ views. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:11–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dragulinescu S. Diseases as natural kinds. Theor Med Bioeth. 2010;31:347–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fine K. Essence and modality. In: Tomberlin JE, editor. Philosophical perspectives 8: logic and language. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview; 1994. p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadorn DC. Kinds of patients. J Med Philos. 1997;22:567–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hesslow G. Do we need a concept of disease? Theor Med Bioeth. 1993;14:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. James W. In: James H, editor. Letters of William James. Boston: Atlantic Monthly; 1920.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kant I. The critique of the power of judgment. In: Guyer P, Matthews E (editors and trans.). Oxford: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kavarana MN, Sade RM. Ethical issues in cardiac surgery. Futur Cardiol. 2012;8:451–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kripke S. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. LaPorte J. Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lemoine M. Defining disease beyond conceptual analysis: an analysis of conceptual analysis in philosophy of medicine. Theor Med Bioeth. 2013;34:309–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leslie SJ. Essence and natural kinds: when science meets preschooler intuition. Oxford Stud Epistemol. 2013;4:108–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowe J. A problem for a posteriori essentialism concerning natural kinds. Analysis. 2007;67:286–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manzoni GM, Castelnuovo G, Compare A, Pagnini F, Essebag V, Proietti R. Psychological effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. A review of study methods. Front Psychol. 2015;6:39. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Marchetti G, Marchetti S, editors. Facts and value: the ethics and metaphysics of normativity. London: Routledge; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Putnam H. The meaning of ‘Meaning’. In: Putnam H, editor. Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1975. p. 215–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Putnam H. Realism with a human face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Putnam H. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quine WV. Natural kinds. In: Quine WV, editor. Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press; 1969. p. 114–38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rehder B, Hastie R. Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001;130:323–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reznek L. The nature of disease. New York: Routledge; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Riggs PJ, editor. Natural kinds, laws of nature and scientific methodology. Dordrecht: Springer; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roy IC. The nature of natural kinds: natural kinds in biology and medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sade RM, Williams T, Haney C, Perlman D, Stroud M. The ethics gap in surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:326–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwartz P. Decision and discovery in defining ‘Disease’. In: Kincaid IH, McKitrick J, editors. Establishing medical reality. Essays in the metaphysics and epistemology of biomedical science. Amsterdam: Springer; 2007. p. 47–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Sulmasy DP. Diseases and natural kinds. Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26:487–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Valore P. Fundamentals of ontological commitment. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Husserl, E. Logical Investigations. Volume 1 and 2. Translated by J. N. Findlay, with a new Preface by M. Dummett and edited with a new Introduction by D. Moran. New York: Routledge; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Valore Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valore, P. (2017). Natural Kinds, Similarity, and Individual Cases: Ontological Presuppositions and Ethical Implications. In: Proietti, R., Manzoni, G., Pietrabissa, G., Castelnuovo, G. (eds) Psychological, Emotional, Social and Cognitive Aspects of Implantable Cardiac Devices. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55721-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55721-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55719-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55721-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics