Advertisement

Network Analysis Methods for Classification of Roles

  • Simona Gozzo
  • Venera TomaselliEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

This paper concerns network analysis (NA) methods employed to classify role profiles based on the measurement and the specification of linking structures among pupils in infant school. With this aim, we measure sociometric status by the direct observation of preschool children behaviours. The data have been collected by a longitudinal observational study. We follow the children in seven waves for 2 months. In this study, we measure relational skills of subjects applying three procedures: The regular equivalence is used to detect similar positions within the network, the lambda sets to observe the ability to be intermediary and the cliques to assess the propensity to belong to a group. Concerning each analytic dimension, the results show an increase of relational competence and an association with ego-network measures.

Keywords

Network analysis Sociometric status Structural equivalence Lambda sets Cliques 

References

  1. 1.
    Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: The class of all regular equivalences: algebraic structure and computation. Soc. Netw. 11, 65–88 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Shirey, P.R.: LS sets, lambda sets and other cohesive subsets. Soc. Netw. 12, 337–357 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bron, C., Kerbosch, J.: Finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun. ACM 16, 575–577 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., Coppotelli, H.: Dimensions and types of social status in the school. A cross-age comparison. Dev. Psychol. 18, 557–570 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., Kupersmidt, J.B.: Peer group behaviours and social status. In: Asher, S.R., Coie, J.C. (eds.) Peer Rejection in Childhood, pp. 17–59. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dodge, K.A., Schlundt, D.C., Schocken, I., Delugach, J.D.: Social competence and children’s sociometric status. The role of peer group entry strategies. Merrill Palmer Q. 29, 309–336 (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giordano, G., Vitale, M.P.: On the use of external information in social network analysis. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 5(2), 95–112 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodreau, S., Kitts, J., Morris, M.: Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using statistical network analysis to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 46, 103–125 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes, C., Dunn, J.: Pretend you didn’t know. Preschoolers? Talk about mental states in pretended play. Cogn. Dev. 12, 381–403 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lorrain, F., White, H.C.: Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. J. Math. Sociol. 1, 49–80 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luce, R., Perry, A.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14, 95–116 (1949)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maag, J.W., Vasa, S.F., Reid, R., Torrey, G.K.: Social and behavioural predictors of popular, rejected and average children. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 55, 196–205 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newcomb, A.F., Bukowski, W.M., Pattee, L.: Children’s peer relations. A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychol. Bull. 113, 99–128 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perner, J., Ruffman, T., Leekam, S.R.: Theory of mind is contagious: you catch it from your sibs. Child Dev. 65, 1228–1238 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Snijders, T.A.B., Pattison, P.E., Robins, G.L., Handcock, M.S.: New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Method. 36, 99–153 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White, D.R., Reitz, K.P.: Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on networks of relations. Soc. Netw. 6, 193–234 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political and Social SciencesUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations