Skip to main content

Task Assignment of Peer Grading in MOOCs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10179))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a massive online course with hundreds of thousands of students, it is unfeasible to provide an accurate and fast evaluation for each submission. Currently the researchers have proposed the algorithms called peer grading for the richly-structured assignments. These algorithms can deliver fairly accurate evaluations through aggregation of peer grading results, but not improve the effectiveness of allocating submissions. Allocating submissions to peers is an important step before the process of peer grading. In this paper, being inspired from the Longest Processing Time (LPT) algorithm that is often used in the parallel system, we propose a Modified Longest Processing Time (MLPT), which can improve the allocation efficiency. The dataset used in this paper consists of two parts, one part is collected from our MOOCs platform, and the other one is manually generated as the simulation dataset. We have shown the experimental results to validate the effectiveness of MLPT based on the two type datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fonteles, A.S., Bouveret, S., Gensel, J.: Heuristics for task recommendation in spatiotemporal crowdsourcing systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, pp. 1–5. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, J., Teevan, J., Bernstein, M.S.: Measuring crowdsourcing effort with error-time curves. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1365–1374. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu, C., Squicciarini, A.C., Carminati, B., et al.: CrowdSelect: increasing accuracy of crowdsourcing tasks through behavior prediction and user selection. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 539–548. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14(6), 1–4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wiki for Multiprocessor Scheduling Information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiprocessor_scheduling

  6. Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., et al.: Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2579 (2013)

  7. Coffman, Jr. E.G., Sethi, R.: A generalized bound on LPT sequencing. In: Proceedings of the 1976 ACM SIGMETRICS Conference on Computer Performance Modeling Measurement and Evaluation, pp. 306–310. ACM (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alfarrarjeh, A., Emrich, T., Shahabi, C.: Scalable spatial crowdsourcing: a study of distributed algorithms. In: 2015 16th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management, vol. 1, pp. 134–144. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baneres, D., Caballé, S., Clarisó, R.: Towards a learning analytics support for intelligent tutoring systems on MOOC platforms. In: 2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), pp. 103–110. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez, T., Ibarra, O.H., Sahni, S.: Bounds for LPT schedules on uniform processors. SIAM J. Comput. 6(1), 155–166 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mi, F., Yeung, D.Y.: Probabilistic graphical models for boosting cardinal and ordinal peer grading in MOOCs. In: AAAI, pp. 454–460 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Massabò, I., Paletta, G., Ruiz-Torres, A.J.: A note on longest processing time algorithms for the two uniform parallel machine makespan minimization problem. J. Sched. 19(2), 207–211 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner, K., Zbarsky, S., Harchol-Balter, M., et al.: The power of d choices for redundancy. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 44(1), 409–410 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feier, M.C., Lemnaru, C., Potolea, R.: Solving NP-complete problems on the CUDA architecture using genetic algorithms. In: International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing, ISPDC 2011, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, pp. 278–281. DBLP, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ul, Hassan U., Curry, E.: Efficient task assignment for spatial crowdsourcing. Expert Syst. Appl: Int. J. 58(C), 36–56 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jung, H.J., Lease, M.: Crowdsourced task routing via matrix factorization. Eprint Arxiv (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karger, D.R., Oh, S., Shah, D.: Budget-optimal crowdsourcing using low-rank matrix approximations. In: 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pp. 284–291. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, Y., Fung, G.M., Rosales, R., et al.: Active learning from crowds. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2011), pp. 1161–1168 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tong, Y., She, J., Ding, B., et al.: Online minimum matching in real-time spatial data: experiments and analysis. Proc. VLDB Endow. (PVLDB) 9(12), 1053–1064 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong, Y., She, J., Ding, B., et al.: Online mobile micro-task allocation in spatial crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2016), pp. 49–60 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tong, Y., She, J., Meng, R.: Bottleneck-aware arrangement over event-based social networks: the max-min approach. World Wide Web J. 19(6), 1151–1177 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. She, J., Tong, Y., Chen, L., et al.: Conflict-aware event-participant arrangement and its variant for online setting. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (TKDE) 28(9), 2281–2295 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. She, J., Tong, Y., Chen, L., et al.: Conflict-aware event-participant arrangement. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2015), pp. 735–746 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grant from State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment (Funding No. SKLSDE-2015ZX-03) and NSFC (Grant No. 61532004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Han, Y., Wu, W., Pu, Y. (2017). Task Assignment of Peer Grading in MOOCs. In: Bao, Z., Trajcevski, G., Chang, L., Hua, W. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55705-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55705-2_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55704-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55705-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics