Abstract
Two pivotal scenes in Gower’s Confessio Amantis—the first expressing a fear of forgetting past sins and the second identifying the moment after confession when recollection of sins is no longer necessary—frame the narrative of the fictitious confession. Amans, the penitent, is concerned that he will be unable to remember his sins and, thus, be prevented from confessing properly. Genius, his confessor, answers Amans’ concern by exploring both Amans’ memory of former sins as well as his own memory of exempla and stories derived from the past. The exploration continues until Amans is allowed to forget his sins as he instead recollects his own personal truth—that he has reached too advanced of an age for earthly love.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Primary Sources
Gower, John. 2006. John Gower: Confessio Amantis, vol. 1, ed. Russell A. Peck. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications.
Holmstedt, Gustaf (ed.). 1930. Speculum Christiani: A Middle English Religious Treatise of the 14th Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Secondary Sources
Allen, Elizabeth. 2005. False Fables and Exemplary Truth in Later Middle English Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baker, Denise Nowakowski. 1976. The Priesthood of Genius: A Study of the Medieval Tradition. Speculum 51: 277–291.
Batchelor, Patricia. 1998. Feigned Truth and Exemplary Method in the Confessio Amantis. In Re-visioning Gower, ed. R.F. Yeager, 1–15. Ashville, NC: Pegasus.
Bunt, G.H.V. 1988. Exemplum and Tale in John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. In Exemplum et Similitudo: Alexander the Great and Other Heroes as Points of Reference in Medieval Literature, ed. W.J. Aerts and M. Gosman, 145–155. Mediaevalia Groningana 8. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.
Chandler, Katherine R. 1992. Memory and Unity in Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Philological Quarterly 71: 15–30.
Dean, James. 1977. Time Past and Time Present in Chaucer’s Clerk’s Tale and Gower’s Confessio Amantis. ELH 44 (3): 401–418.
Kinneavy, Gerald. 1984. Gower’s Confessio Amantis and the Penitentials. Chaucer Review 19: 144–163.
Körntgen, Ludger. 2006. Canon law and the practice of penance: Burchard of Worms’s penitential. Early Medieval Europe 14 (1): 103–117.
Mitchell, J. Allan. 2004. Ethics and Exemplary Narrative in Chaucer and Gower. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Murray, Alexander. 1998. Counselling in Medieval Confession. In Handling Sin: Confession in the Middle Ages, ed. Peter Biller and Alastair J. Minnis, 63–77. York Studies in Medieval Theology 2. York: Boydell & Brewer.
Nicholson, Peter. 1986. The ‘Confession’ in Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Studia Neophilologica 58: 193–204.
Robins, William. 1997. Romance, Exemplum, and the Subject of the Confessio Amantis. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 19: 157–181.
Scanlon, Larry. 1994. Narrative, Authority, and Power: The Medieval Exemplum and the Chaucerian Tradition. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, James. 1995. Sciences and the Self in Medieval Poetry: Alan of Lille’s Anticlaudianus and John Gower’s Confessio Amantis. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stegner, Paul D. 2011. ‘Foryet it thou, and so wol I’: Absolving Memory in Confessio Amantis. Studies in Philology 108: 488–507.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tracy, K.G. (2017). Gower: Confessio Amantis and the Fear of Forgetting. In: Memory and Confession in Middle English Literature. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55675-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55675-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55674-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55675-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)