Abstract
The paper is devoted to the experimental comparison of performance and fault tolerance of software packages Pyramid, X-COM and BOINC. This paper contains the technique of carrying out the experiments and the results of these experiments. The performance comparison was carried out by assessing the overhead costs to arrange parallelization by data. In this case special tests simulating typical tasks of parallelization by data were designed by the authors. The comparison of fault tolerance was performed by simulating various emergency situations that arise during computations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baranov, A., Kiselev, A., Kiselev, E., Korneev, V., Semenov, D.: The software package «Pyramid» for parallel computations arrangement with parallelization by data (in Russian). In: Scientific Services & Internet: Supercomputing Centers and Applications: Proceedings of the International Supercomputing Conference, Novorossiysk, Russia, 20–25 September 2010, pp. 299–302. Publishing of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow (2010)
Alekseev, A., Baranov, A., Kiselev, A., Kiselev, E.: The experimental comparison of the technologies of parallelization by data «Pyramid», MapReduce and MPI (in Russian). In: Supercomputing Technologies (SCT 2014): Proceedings of the 3-D All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference, Divnomorskoe, Gelendzhik, Russia, 29 September–04 October 2014, , vol. 1, pp. 77–80. Publishing of the Southern Federal University, Postov-on-Don (2014)
Filamofitsky, M.: The system X-Com for metacomputing support: architecture and technology (in Russian). J. Numer. Methods Program. 5, 123–137 (2004). Publishing of the Research Computing Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow
BOINC. Open-source software for volunteer computing. http://boinc.berkeley.edu
SETI@HOME. http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
Costa, F., Silva, L., Dahlin, M.: Volunteer cloud computing: mapreduce over the internet. In: 2011 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 1850–1857. http://hpcolsi.dei.uc.pt/hpcolsi/publications/mapreduce-pcgrid2011.pdf
Naegele, T.: MapReduce Framework Performance Comparison. http://www.cs.ru.nl/bachelorscripties/2013/Thomas_Naegele___4031253___MapReduce_Framework_Performance_Comparison.pdf
Tang, B., Moca, M., Chevalier, S., He, H., Fedak, G.: Towards mapreduce for desktop grid computing. http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~gfedak/thesis/xtremmapreduce.3pgcic10.pdf
Pavlo, A., Paulson, E., Rasin, A., et al.: A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis. http://database.cs.brown.edu/sigmod09/benchmarks-sigmod09.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baranov, A., Kiselev, E., Chernyaev, D. (2016). Experimental Comparison of Performance and Fault Tolerance of Software Packages Pyramid, X-COM, and BOINC. In: Voevodin, V., Sobolev, S. (eds) Supercomputing. RuSCDays 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 687. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55669-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55669-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55668-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55669-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)