Vedic Mathematics as Fast Algorithms in Green Computing for Internet of Things

  • Vladimir SklyarEmail author
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 105)


The paper describes an approach to improve energy efficiency of low power devices for Internet of Things (IoT). Energy efficiency of IoT is one from the main challenges in this domain as well as security with big scale systems and data management. The proposed approach is based on using of fast computation algorithms like Vedic Mathematic. IoT architecture for experiments with different applications and features is proposed and described. The Device Layer of this architecture is based on Arduino platform. A measurement of power consumption of Device Layer in conditions of constant power supply voltage can be done with Hall Effect sensors which are able to measure a current. Dependencies of operation cycle time and consumed device memory from computations algorithms and variables types are experimentally investigated. Future research directions in area of IoT energy efficiency in conjunction with safety and security are formulated.


Internet of things Vedic mathematics Arduino 


  1. 1.
    Top 10 IoT Technologies for 2017 and 2018. Technical Report G00296351, Gartner Inc., January 2016, 12 pGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sajid, A., Abbas, H., Saleem, K.: Cloud-assisted IoT-Based SCADA systems security: a review of the state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Access 4, 1375–1384 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Islam, R., Kwak, A., Kabir, H., Hossain, M., Kwak, K.-S.: The internet of things for health care: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 3, 678–708 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M.: Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 17(4), 2347–2376 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsai, K.-L., Leu, F.-Y., You, I.: Residence energy control system based on wireless smart socket and IoT. IEEE Access 4, 2885–2894 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Xu, S., Li, G.: Fundamental trade-offs on green wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49(6), 30–37 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fell, M., Melin, H.: Roadmap for the emerging internet of things, Carre & Strauss (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sklyar, V., Odarushchenko, O., Bulba, E., Horbenko, R., Ivasyuk, A., Kotov, D.: Assessment of energy consumption for safety-related PLC-based systems. In: Kharchenko, V., Kondratenko, Y., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Green IT Engineering: Concepts, Models, Complex Systems Architectures, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Vol. 74, pp. 269–281. Springer, Berlin (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44162-7_14
  9. 9.
    Kharchenko, V., Gorbenko, A., Sklyar, V., Phillips, C.: Green computing and communications in critical application domains: challenges and solutions. In: Proceedings of the 9th Digital Technologies International Conference “DT 2013”–Žilina, Slovakia, pp. 241–247, 29–31 May 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robles, T., Alcarria, R., Martın1, D., Navarro, M., Calero, R., Iglesias, S., Lopez, M.: An IoT based reference architecture for smart water management processes. J. Wireless Mobile Netw Ubiquit Comput Dependable Appl 6(1): 4–23 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Voica, A.: 5 reasons why MIPS M-class CPUs are ideal for IoT, Imagination Inc., April 2016. [Online]. Available:
  12. 12.
    Kharchenko, V., Kondratenko, Y., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.): Green IT Engineering: Concepts, Models, Complex Systems Architectures, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Vol. 74. Springer, Berlin (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44162-7
  13. 13.
    Kondratenko, Y., Korobko, O., Kozlov, O.: PLC-based systems for data acquisition and supervisory control of environment-friendly energy-saving technologies. In: Kharchenko, V., Kondratenko, Y., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Green IT Engineering: Concepts, Models, Complex Systems Architectures, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Vol. 74, pp. 247–267. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44162-7_13
  14. 14.
    Swami Sri Bharati Krishna Tirtha: Vedic Mathematics, 367 p. Motilal Banarsidass (1965)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kandasamy, V., Smarandache, F.: Vedic Mathematics—‘Vedic’ or ‘Mathematics’: A Fuzzy & Neutrosophic Analysis, 220 p. University of New Mexico (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Trachtenberg Speed System of Basic Mathematics (English edition), Translated and Adapted by Ann Cutler and Rudolph Mcshane, Doubleday & Company Inc., New York, USA, 270 p (1960)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karatsuba, A., Karatsuba, E.: Application of ATS in a quantum-optical model. In: Analysis and Mathematical Physics: Trends in Mathematics, pp. 211–232 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sujatha, S., Krishnammal, V.: Performance analysis of Anurupye vedic multiplier In FFT Processor. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Researches in Science, Management and Engineering (ICRSME2016), Coimbatore, India, pp. 1–6, 18–19 Feb 2016Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chidgupkar, P., Karad, T.: The implementation of Vedic algorithms in digital signal processing. Global J. Eng. Educ. 8(2), 89–97 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall Effect Sensing and Applications, Honeywell Sensing and Control, Freeport, Illinois, USA, 117 p. (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Voas, J.: Networks of ‘Things’, 32 p. NIST Special Publication 800–183, National Institute of Standard and Technologies, USA (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Aerospace University “KhAI”KharkivUkraine

Personalised recommendations