Advertisement

Hunting Tourism: The Case of Canadian Prairie Waterfowl Hunters

  • Farhad MoghimehfarEmail author
  • Howard W. Harshaw
  • Lee Foote
Chapter
Part of the Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism book series (GGAG)

Abstract

Hunting tourism plays important roles in the conservation of wildlife; hunters provide financial support for conservation programs and habitat protection, assist in the monitoring of wildlife populations, and play important roles in population management (Heffelfinger et al. in Int J Environ Stud 70(3):399–413, 2013). These conservation roles indirectly benefit host communities through the stewardship of wildlife populations and the protection of habitats. The hunting of waterfowl is a popular form of hunting tourism; however, the number of North American waterfowl hunters has been declining since the mid-1970s (NAWMP Revised objectives: an addendum to the 2012 North American Waterfowl Management Plan. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, 2014). Although a number of conservation and waterfowl hunting organizations and government programs offer educational and mentorship programs to promote waterfowl hunting and retain hunters, declines in the number of waterfowl hunters continues. This chapter examines constraints to hunting tourism and explores waterfowl hunters’ motivations in an effort to understand what influences decisions to participate in waterfowl hunting as a nature-based tourism activity. Using a deductive approach, this chapter employs self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan in J Mind Behav 1(1):33–43, 1980), the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen in Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211, 1991), and leisure constraints theory (Crawford et al. in Leisure Sci 13(4):309–320, 1991) to guide a thematic analysis. Thirty-four waterfowl hunters, representing a range of skill levels and commitment to the activity, were interviewed in three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) about the factors that influenced their decisions to hunt waterfowl. These factors included structural, interpersonal, and intrapersonal constraints, and attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. We contrast the theoretical and managerial implications of these findings. Findings of this qualitative research inform tourism, outdoor recreation, and wildlife managers and planners to develop strategies for the recruitment and retention of hunting tourists and help retain the local ecological and economic benefits of waterfowl hunting.

Keywords

Hunting tourism Constraints Motivation Theory of planned behavior Canadian prairies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the Delta Waterfowl Foundation and the Alberta Conservation Association.

References

  1. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Philos Rhetoric 10(2):130–132Google Scholar
  3. Apps K, Dimmock K, Lloyd D, Huveneers C (2016) In the water with white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias): participants’ beliefs toward cage-diving in Australia. Anthrozoös 29(2):231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardoin NM, Wheaton M, Bowers AW, Hunt CA, Durham WH (2015) Nature-based tourism’s impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. J Sustain Tour 23(6):838–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baur J, Herr A (2004) Hunting and fishing tourism. In: Higginbottom K (ed) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground, Altona, Victoria, pp 57–77Google Scholar
  6. Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance; people as predation-free predators? J Appl Ecol 41(2):335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bélanger L, Bédard J (1995) Hunting and waterfowl. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Island Press, Washington, pp 230–241Google Scholar
  8. Crawford DW, Jackson EL, Godbey G (1991) A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sci 13(4):309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creswell JW (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Darner R (2009) Self-determination theory as a guide to fostering environmental motivation. J Environ Educ 40(2):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci EL, Ryan RM (1980) Self-determination theory: when mind mediates behavior. J Mind Behav 1(1):33–43Google Scholar
  12. Decker DJ, Connelly NA (1989) Motivations for deer hunting: implications for antlerless deer harvest as a management tool. Wildlife Soc Bull (1973–2006) 17(4):455–463Google Scholar
  13. Dobson AP, Rodriquez JP, Roberts WM, Wilcove DS (1997) Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275(5299):550–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enck JW, Swift BL, Decker DJ (1993) Reasons for decline in duck hunting: insights from New York. Wildl Soc Bull 21(1):10–21Google Scholar
  15. Everett MW, Nelson CM (2016) ‘Flow’and satisfaction of Michigan youth waterfowl hunters: implications for hunter retention. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure 39(2):1–13Google Scholar
  16. Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Governments of Canada (2014) 2012 Canadian nature survey: awareness, participation, and expenditures in nature-related recreation, conservation, and subsistence activities. Canadian Councils of Resource Ministers, Ottawa, ON, p. 181Google Scholar
  17. Green R, Giese M (2004) Negative effects of wildlife tourism on wildlife. In: Higginbottom K (ed) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground, Altona, Victoria, pp 81–97Google Scholar
  18. Hammitt WE, Cole DN (1998) Wildland recreation: ecology and management. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayslette SE, Armstrong JB, Mirarchi RE (2001) Mourning dove hunting in Alabama: motivations, satisfactions, and sociocultural influences. Hum Dimens Wildl 6(2):81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heffelfinger JR, Geist V, Wishart W (2013) The role of hunting in North American wildlife conservation. Int J Environ Stud 70(3):399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higginbottom K (ed) (2004) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Publishing, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  22. Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J (2001) Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sci 23(3):165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang LF, Chiang CC, Chen HC (2014) Willingness to pay of visitors for the nature-based public park: an extension of theory of planning behavior (TPB). J Inf Optim Sci 35(5–6):405–429Google Scholar
  24. Hung K, Petrick JF (2012) Testing the effects of congruity, travel constraints, and self-efficacy on travel intentions: an alternative decision-making model. Tour Manag 33(4):855–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson EL (2000) Will research on leisure constraints still be relevant in the twenty-first century? J Leisure Res 32(1):62Google Scholar
  26. Kleiber DA, Walker GJ, Mannell RC (2011) A social psychology of leisure. Venture Pub, NYGoogle Scholar
  27. Klett AT, Johnson DH (1982) Variability in nest survival rates and implications to nesting studies. USGS Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Paper 191Google Scholar
  28. Knight RL, Cole DN (1995) Wildlife responses to recreationists. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 55–72Google Scholar
  29. Kouthouris C, Spontis A (2005) Outdoor recreation participation: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Sport J 8(3)Google Scholar
  30. Kramer DB, Mitterling A, Frank KA (2016) Understanding peer influence in hunter harvest decisions using social network theory and analysis. Hum Dimens Wildl 21(5):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lauckhart JB (1956) Calculating mortality rates for waterfowl. The Murrelet 37(3):31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee TH, Tseng CH, Jan FH (2015) Risk-taking attitude and behavior of adventure recreationists: a review. J Tour Hosp 4(149):1–3Google Scholar
  33. Luo Y, Deng J (2007) The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. J Travel Res 46:392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manfredo MJ, Driver BL, Tarrant MA (1996) Measuring leisure motivation: a meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. J Leisure Res 28(3):188Google Scholar
  35. Marques C, Reis E, Menezes J, Salgueiro MD (2015) Modelling preferences for nature-based recreation activities. Leisure Stud 1–19Google Scholar
  36. Mayan MJ (2009) Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Routledge, NYGoogle Scholar
  37. Meng F, Tepanon Y, Uysal M (2008) Measuring tourist satisfaction by attribute and motivation: the case of a nature-based resort. J Vacat Market 14(1):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Metcalf EC, Graefe AR, Trauntvein NE, Burns RC (2015) Understanding hunting constraints and negotiation strategies: a typology of female hunters. Hum Dimens Wildl 20(1):30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NAWMP (2014) North American Waterfowl Management Plan Committee. Revised objectives: an addendum to the 2012 North American Waterfowl Management Plan. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Pattons (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  41. Peng N, Chen A, Hung KP (2014) Including pets when undertaking tourism activities: incorporating pet attachment into the TPB Model. Tour Anal 19(1):69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reynolds PC, Braithwaite D (2001) Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tour Manag 22(1):31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossi AN, Armstrong JB (1999) Theory of reasoned action vs. theory of planned behavior: testing the suitability and sufficiency of a popular behavior model using hunting intentions. Hum Dimens Wildl 4(3):40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shrestha SK (2013) Predicting deer hunting participation using theory of planned behavior and constraint integrated theory of planned behavior models: a study of Oregon big game hunters. West Virginia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrestha SK, Burns RC (2016) Integrating constraints to the theory of planned behavior in predicting deer hunting participation. Hum Dimens Wildl 21(5):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shrestha SK, Burns RC, Pierskalla CD, Selin S (2012) Predicting deer hunting intentions using the theory of planned behavior: a survey of Oregon big game hunters. Hum Dimens Wildl 17(2):129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. US Fish and Wildlife Services (2016) Waterfowl population status report 16. https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/surveys-and-data/Population-status/Waterfowl/WaterfowlPopulationStatusReport16.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2016
  49. Wilson E (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson E (2007) Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In: Penn DJ, Mysterud I (eds) Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 249–257Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farhad Moghimehfar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Howard W. Harshaw
    • 2
  • Lee Foote
    • 3
  1. 1.Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Management, Ecosystem Science and ManagementUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  2. 2.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Devonian Botanic GardenUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations