Abstract
This paper introduces a proposed didactical model for organizing educational robotics activities, addressed to primary and secondary school, and called “CPG+” after Collaboration, Problem, Game - competition, while “+” stands for supplementary teachers’ supportive interventions such as promoting students’ problem solving and computational thinking skills. Then, a study conducted in an elementary school is presented, which was based on the CPG+ model and investigates the development of computational thinking and problem solving skills, focusing on the role of guidance (strong vs. minimal). For developing computational thinking skills we focused on the following basic concepts: abstraction, generalization, algorithm, decomposition, modularity, and debugging. The results show that: (a) educational robotics activities fringed by the didactical model CPG+ can be a vehicle for the development of high order skills, (b) although providing written answers is tiring and boring for students, it is an important learning tool.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alimisis, D.: Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 6(1), 63–71 (2013)
Grover, S.: Robotics and engineering for middle and high school students to develop computational thinking. (650), pp. 1–15 (2011)
Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., Korb, J.T.: Introducing computational thinking in education courses. In: Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education-SIGCSE0000 2011, pp. 465–470 (2011)
Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)
Alimisis, D., (ed.): Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods. School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE) (2009)
Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2011)
Matari, M.J.: Robotics Education for All Ages, Robotics (2004)
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S.: Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: a study on age and gender relevant differences. Robot. Auton. Syst. 75, 661–670 (2016)
Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., Lirrete-Pitre, N.: Strategies used by elementary school children solving robotics-based complex tasks: innovative potential of technology. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(2), 2851–2857 (2010)
Chambers, J.M., Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., Grove, S.: Scaffolding knowledge construction through robotic technology: a middle school case study. Electron. J. Integr. Technol. Educ. 6, 55–70 (2007)
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., Malyn-Smith, J., et al.: Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads 2(1), 32–37 (2011)
Repenning, A., Webb, D., Ioannidou, A.: Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE 2010, p. 265 (2010). doi:10.1145/1734263.1734357
Frangou, S., Papanikolaou, K., Aravecchia, L., Montel, L., Ionita, S., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Menegatti, E., Moro, M., Fava, N., Monfalcon, S., Pagello, I.: Representative examples of implementing educational robotics in school based on the constructivist approach. In: Workshop Proceedings of SIMPAR 2008, pp. 54–65 (2008)
Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Carrignon, S.: Representations to go: learning robotics, learning by robotics. In: Workshop Proceedings of Interational Conference on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots, SIMPAR, pp. 484–493 (2010)
Eteokleous-Grigoriou, N., Psomas, C.: Integrating robotics as an interdisciplinary educational tool in primary education. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, vol. 2013(1), pp. 3877–3881 (2013)
Williams, D., Ma, Y., Prejean, L.: A preliminary study exploring the use of fictional narrative in robotics activities. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach. 29(1), 51–71 (2010). Chesapeake, VA: AACE
Settle, A., Perkovic, L.: Computational thinking across the curriculum: a conceptual framework. Technical reports (2010)
Bottino, R., Chioccariello, A.: Computational thinking: videogames, educational robotics, and other powerful ideas to think with. In: KEYCIT: Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT, vol. 7, p. 301 (2015)
Kazakoff, E.R., Sullivan, A., Bers, M.U.: The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Child. Educ. J. 41, 245–255 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
Bers, M.U.: The TangibleK robotics program: applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Res. Pract. 12, 1–20 (2010). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/bers.html. Accessed Sep. 2014
Grover, S., Pea, R.: Computational thinking in K–12: a review of the state of the field. Educ. Researcher 42, 38–43 (2013). doi:10.3102/0013189X12463051
Eguchi, A.: Learning experience through RoboCupJunior: promoting engineering and computational thinking skills through robotics competition. In: K-12 Computer Science Computational Thinking Initiatives, Indianapolis, Indiana, pp. 1–18 (2014). https://peer.asee.org/20743
Touretzky, D.S., Marghitu, D., Ludi, S., Bernstein, D., Ni, L.: Accelerating K-12 computational thinking using scaffolding, staging, and abstraction. In: Proceeding of 44th ACM Technical Symposium Computer Science Education - SIGCSE 2013. ACM Press, New York, p. 609 (2013). doi:10.1145/2445196.2445374
Penmetcha, M.: Exploring the effectiveness of robotics as a vehicle for computational thinking. Purdue University (2012). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1221535411. Accessed Mar. 2014
Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., Mackinnon, L.: A serious game for developing computational thinking and learning introductory computer programming. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 47, 1991–1999 (2012)
Schmidt, H.G., Loyens, S.M., Van Gog, T., Paas, F.: Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ. Psychol. 42(2), 91–97 (2007)
Clark, R.E., Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J.: Putting students on the path to learning: the case for fully guided instruction. Am. Educ. 36(1), 6–11 (2012)
Menary, R.: Writing as thinking. Lang. Sci. 29(5), 621–632 (2007)
Papadopoulos, P., Demetriadis, S., Stamelos, I., Tsoukalas, I.: The value of writing-to-learn when using question prompts to support web-based learning in ill-structured domains. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 59(1), 71–90 (2011)
Polya, G.: How to Solve it: A New Aspect of Mathematical Model. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1945)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S. (2017). A Didactical Model for Educational Robotics Activities: A Study on Improving Skills Through Strong or Minimal Guidance. In: Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Menegatti, E. (eds) Educational Robotics in the Makers Era. Edurobotics 2016 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55552-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55553-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)