Abstract
In the name of psychoanalysis, for more than one century, various theories have been produced about non-binary gender and sexualities, evaluated with respect to their conformity to the Oedipus complex, the castration complex, or the formulas of sexuation and the phallus. Most of these analyses refer to the Symbolic, a Lacanian or Lacan-inspired register of transcendental, universal rules that determine subjectivity and the “normal” processes of subjectivation. This raises the question of the effect of a structuralist conception of the Unconscious on human lives, and on the constitution of “lives worth living”. For many psychoanalysts, Merleau-Ponty’s conception of the Unconscious proves misconstrued insofar as he leaves aside its linguistic dimension. Hence, to which extent may a non-language-based conception of the Unconscious avoid imposing universal subjectivation categories that stretch beyond history and culture? The aim of this article is to show how Merleau-Ponty’s non-exclusively-verbal Unconscious is concerned with affect, a perspective that entails a different, not exclusively linguistic conception of the Symbolic. For that purpose, I argue that Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, differently from Husserl’s, is a phenomenology of affectivity. Expatiating on the centrality of the lived body, it moves away from constitution to institution, in a way that places affectivity, and not language at the core of the Unconscious. This conception results in two consequences: the Unconscious is not, or not entirely verbal, which implies the possibility of a non-binary reading of gender and sexuality. This non-exclusively-verbal Unconscious may lay the ground for a feminist analysis of gender.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
About psychoanalytical theories on perversion, cf. Ayouch (2014).
- 2.
About psychoanalytical theories on transidentities, cf. Ayouch (2015).
- 3.
“Le plus grand enseignement de la réduction est l’impossibilité d’une réduction complète” (Merleau-Ponty 1945, p. viii).
- 4.
- 5.
Strictly speaking, the affect cannot be unconscious. Freud mentions “unconscious affects” only in a second sens : an instinctual impulse, as he writes in “Notes on the Unconscious” (1915a), means an impulse whose ideational-representative (Vorstellungsrepräsentanz) is unconscious, and strictly speaking, there are no unconscious affects similar to the unconscious ideas. Yet, we could speak of unconscious affects to refer to the displacement of an affect from a repressed idea to a conscious one : the affect is felt, yet not recognised. In another context, an affect can be considered unconscious when it is transformed into a qualitatively different affect, mainly anxiety, or suppressed. The unconscious affects are those revealed to consciousness once repression is lifted. In other words, unconscious affects are never directly attested: they prove always differed.
- 6.
He expresses “discomfort in seeing the category of language take up all the room” (Ey 1966, p. 173), criticizes the “ridiculous plays on words” (Merleau-Ponty 2000, p. 279) in some versions of psychoanalysis, or states, right after Lacan’s intervention in the Société française de philosophie, that “language cannot be reduced to puns” (Merleau-Ponty 1960b/2000).
- 7.
The concept first appears in the Structure of Behaviour, linked to Hegel and dialectics (Merleau-Ponty 1942, p. 224). It refers to the Husserlian Stiftung in Phenomenology of Perception. In “Concerning Marxism” (Merleau-Ponty 1996), the notion of institution allows to understand the ambiguity of history beyond the traditional opposition of mechanism and finalism. But this notion acquires its plain meaning in The Adventures of dialectics (Merleau-Ponty 1955), where it is used to replace a conscientialist interpretation of history.
- 8.
“Feelings are not concealed: ideas yield to censorship, but not feelings; hence dreams in which the feelings are not adapted to the content” (ibid., p. 204).
References and Endnotes
Aulagnier, Piera, and Al. 1967. Le désir et la perversion. Paris: Seuil.
Ayouch, Thamy. 2009a. Approche de la psychanalyse par la phénoménologie: l’exemple de Merleau-Ponty. Revue de phénoménologie et de psychologie analytique. 2009-1: 7–20.
———. 2009b. Body-proper and fantasmatic body: The debate between Merleau-Pontyan phenomenology and psychoanalysis. The Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28 (2): 336–355.
———. 2012. La Consonance imparfaite. Maurice Merleau-Ponty et la psychoanalyse. Paris: Le Bord de l’Eau.
———. 2014. Questionando a teoria psicanalítica das perversões. In Psicanálise e questões da contemporaneidade II, 81–95, Curitiba/São Paulo: CRV.
———. 2015. Psychanalyse et transidentités: hétérotopies. Evolution Psychiatrique 80 (2). doi:10.1016/j.evopsy.2015.01.004.
Baas, B. 1996. L’élaboration de l’objet a: Lacan avec Kant et Merleau-Ponty. In Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, tome 4, 13–41, Strasbourg: USHS.
———. 1998. Jacques Lacan et la traversée de la phenomenology. In Phénoménologie et psychanalyse. Etranges relations, 32–40. Paris: Champ Vallon.
Barbaras, Renaud. 1999. Le Désir et la distance. Paris: Vrin.
Benoist, Jocelyn. 2006. Pulsion, cause et raison chez Freud. In La Pulsion, 115–138. Paris: Vrin.
Bergeret, Jean. 1996. La personnalité normale et pathologique. Paris: Dunod.
Breuer, Joseph, Freud, Sigmund. 1895/1971. Etudes sur l’hystérie. Paris: P.U.F.
Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–531.
———. 1989. Sexual ideology and phenomenological description: A feminist critique of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of perception. In The thinking muse: Feminism and modern French philosophy, ed. Allen, Jeffner and Iris Marion Young, 85–100. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
———. 1990. Gender trouble. Feminism and subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
———. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
———. 2012. Défaire le genre. Amsterdam: Paris.
———. 2014. Qu’est-ce qu’une vie bonne. Paris: Payot.
Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1971. Le Dicible et l’indicible. L’Arc. “Merleau-Ponty” 67–79.
Chiland, Colette. 2005. Problèmes posés par les transsexuels aux psychanalystes. Revue française de psychoanalyse. 2005–2/69: 563–577.
Czermak, Marcel. 1982. Précisions sur la clinique du transsexualisme. Discours psychanalytique. 3
———. 1996. Préface. In Sur l’identité sexuelle: à propos du transsexualisme, ed. Henri Frignet, 11–24. Paris: Editions de l’Association freudienne.
Dor, Joël. 1987. Structure et perversions. Paris: Denoël.
Ey, Henri. 1966. L’inconscient. VIè Colloque de Bonneval, 1960. Paris: Desclée de Brower.
Freud, Sigmund. 1915a. Repression. The standard edition, volume XIV: A history of the psycho-analytic movement, papers on metapsychology, and other works. London: Hogarth Press.
———. 1915b. Instincts and their vicissitudes. The standard edition, volume XIV: A history of the psycho-analytic movement, papers on metapsychology, and other works. London: Hogarth Press.
———. 1900/1967. L’Interprétation des rêves. Paris: P.U.F.
Frignet, Henri. 2000. Le transsexualisme. Paris: Déclée de Brower.
Green, André. 1964. Du comportement à la chair : itinéraire de Merleau-Ponty. Critique 211: 1017–1046.
Husserl, Edmund. 1950. Idées directrices pour une phenomenology. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 1998. La Synthèse passive. Paris: Jérôme Millon.
Irigaray, Luce. 1984. Ethique de la difference sexuelle. Paris: Minuit.
Kruks, Sonia. 2001. Retrieving experience: subjectivity and recognition in feminist politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1961a. Le Séminaire, livre XI, Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Paris: Seuil.
———. 1961b/2001. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Autres écrits. Paris: Seuil.
———. 1966. Ecrits. Paris: Seuil.
———. 2011. Ou Pire. Séminaire, Livre XIX (1971–1972). Paris: Seuil.
Laplanche. 2007. Sexual. La sexualité élargie au sens freudien. Paris: P.U.F.
Le Doeuf, Michèle. 1998. Le Sexe du savoir. Paris: Aubier.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1942. La Structure du comportement. Paris: P.U.F.
———. 1945. La Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 1955. Les Aventures de la dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 1960a. Le Visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 1960b/2000. Préface à l’ouvrage de A. Hesnard, L’œuvre et l’esprit de Freud et son importance dans le monde moderne. Parcours Deux (1951–1961). Paris: Verdier.
———. 1968. Résumés de cours. Collège de France. 1952–1960. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 1969. La Prose du monde. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 1996. Sens et non-sens. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 2000. Parcours Deux. Paris: Verdier.
———. 2003. L’Institution. La passivité. Notes de cours au Collège de France. 1954–1955. Tours: Belin.
Morel, Geneviève. 2004. Ambiguités sexuelles. Paris: Anthropos.
Pirlot, George, and J.-L. Pedinelli. 2009. Les perversions sexuelles et narcissiques. Paris: Armand Collin.
Pontalis, J.-B. 1961. La Position du problème de l’inconscient chez Merleau-Ponty. In Après Freud, ed. J.-B. Pontalis (1993), pp 76–97. Paris: Gallimard.
Stoller, Silvia. 2010. Expressivity and performativity: Merleau-Ponty and Butler. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1): 97–110.
Sullivan, Shannon. 1997. Domination and dialogue in Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of perception. Hypatia 12 (1): 1–19.
Young Iris, M. 1990. Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ayouch, T. (2017). Merleau-Ponty’s Non-Exclusively-Verbal Unconscious: Affect Figurability and Gender. In: Legrand, D., Trigg, D. (eds) Unconsciousness Between Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 88. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55518-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55518-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55516-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55518-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)