Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 14))

Abstract

Many jurisdictions have urged educators to engage students in decision-making regarding socioscientific issues, such as debates about climate change. Scholars suggest that students also need to take social actions —such as lobbying of power-brokers—to address issues. This latter tack, however, often meets various structural and cultural barriers. Some evidence suggests, however, that student motivation to act can be enhanced when they self-direct secondary and primary research to inform their actions. Nevertheless, motivation to act may or may not be based on adequate premises. In the study reported here, we concluded—based on constant comparative analyses of qualitative data—that students’ engagement in research-informed and negotiated actions to address socioscientific issues can be enhanced through their use of actor-network theory and practices. Implications for promotion of socio-political activism in and through school science are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ontological gaps are mistranslations in World ←→ Sign relationships due to differences in the nature of ontological entities involved (e.g., tree vs. picture of tree).

  2. 2.

    The citation for this publication is omitted here because it would reveal the identity of Mirjan’s school and students involved in our study.

References

  • Acosta-Alzuru, C., & Lester Roushanzamir, E. P. (2003). Everything we do is a celebration of you!: Pleasant company constructs American girlhood. The Communication Review, 6(1), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, M. (2004). The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J. (2011). Childhood under siege: How big business targets children. Toronto, ON: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. L., Hammond, S. K., & Glantz, S. A. (2006). The tobacco industry’s role in the 16 Cities Study of Secondhand Tobacco Smoke: Do the data support the stated conclusions? Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(12), 1890–1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L., & Alsop, S. (Eds.). (2014). Activist science & technology education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L., & Carter, L. (2015). Capitalists’ profitable virtual worlds: Roles for science & technology education. In P. P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics, vol. 1 & 2 (pp. 1197–1212). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ research-informed socioscientific activism: Re/Visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B., & Rolheiser, C. (2001). Beyond Monet: The artful science of instructional integration. Toronto, ON: Bookation Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of theory: Research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, W. L. P. (2009). Scientific literacy: A Freirean perspective as a radical view of humanistic science education. Science Education, 93(2), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: Scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hileman, B. (1998). Industry’s privacy rights: Is science shortchanged? Chemical & Engineering News, 76(17), 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism and the climate. Toronto, Canada: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, D. L. (2003). Impure cultures: University biology and the world of commerce. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, A. (2010). The story of stuff: How our obsession with stuff is trashing the planet, our communities, and our health – And a vision for change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2013). Practice and theory of socio-scientific issues: An authentic model? Studies in Science Education, 49(10), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. (2013). The cancer stage of capitalism: From crisis to cure. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education [MoE]. (2008). The Ontario curriculum, grades 9 and 10: Science. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). Successful STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. (2010). Merchants of doubt. London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy, J. R., & Krstovic, M. (2001). Later life learners: A significant and receptive audience for introductory astronomy. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 95, 205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C. (2013). Education in the age of biocapitalism: Optimizing educational life for a flat world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2007). Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and trends. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of an argumentation intervention on Grade 10 students’ conceptual understanding of genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. H. (1998). Democracy and the curriculum. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (pp. 177–198). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Bencze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Grade 10 Academic Science: Chemistry Research-Informed STSE Action Project

Appendix A: Grade 10 Academic Science: Chemistry Research-Informed STSE Action Project

*Each lesson presented here is intended for a 75 minute period*

Lesson 1: Expressing your ideas

1.1 Introduction

Most of our everyday products that we, in developed and industrialized countries, use and/or consume involve the use of chemicals and chemical reactions. From the moment that you get up from your bed in the morning you start to interact with everyday substances such as soaps, toothpaste, shampoos, body sprays, etc. You may be taking multivitamin supplements, wearing wrinkle resistant shirts or drinking carbonated (or non-carbonated) beverages. All of these products contain chemicals.

1.1.1 Group Activity

figure a
  1. 1.

    In a group of three to four students, do a two to three minute brainstorm to outline a list of everyday products containing chemicals that you use at home.

  2. 2.

    Create a chart to show at least one positive and one negative consequences of each product on the well-being of societies and/or environments.

  3. 3.

    In another column of the same chart list any information you would need to research in order to state the positive and negative consequences of the product.

  4. 4.

    Consider the image of a Trojan horse. The Trojan horse was a great example where warriors were hidden inside a giant horse statue and delivered into the heart of the city. The town’s people saw how great a gift the horse was but didn’t realize what was lurking inside. Discuss with your group how the Trojan horse metaphor is relates to the products you listed in your table.

  5. 5.

    Consider the following statement: Be it resolved that companies should reduce the use of harmful chemicals in their products even if it compromises the product effectiveness. Decide if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, strongly disagree or somewhat disagree with this statement. Move to the corner of the classroom that best represents your view. Discuss your position with a partner or in a group of three when you get to your appropriate corner of the room.

Lesson 2: Lifecycle of a Product

The whole life cycle of a product (from its creation through to its disposal) needs to be taken into account when considering its impact on the well-being of individuals, societies and environments. This is where we begin with a deeper exploration of various chemical products, which on the surface may appear to be a simple product, but in reality there are many components that link together in the life cycle of a product.

1.1.2 Activity

figure b
  1. 1.

    Watch “The Story of Stuff” with Annie Leonard.

  2. 2.

    Fill in the table below stating at least one negative consequence on the well-being of individuals, societies and environments during each stage in the lifecycle of a product.

Stage of the lifecycle of a product

Negative consequence on individuals

Negative consequence on societies

Negative consequence on environments

Extraction

   

Production

   

Distribution

   

Consumption

   

Disposal

   
  1. 3.

    Discuss the consequences with your group, then with the whole class (teacher guided discussion). Ensure that your table is complete as you will need this information for the next stage of your research-informed action project.

Lesson 3: Creating a Mind Map

Many products come with negative features which are often masked to make the product appear a certain way. This is analogous to the Trojan horse we explored earlier. The negative aspects of many personal hygiene products are usually kept away from the general public. We only see what the companies want us to see so they attract the consumers and generate as much profit.

1.1.2.1 Goals of the Lesson and Your Task
figure c
  1. 1.

    Your teacher will create a mind map for a ‘smart phone’ showing some of the most important components (living and nonliving) during the lifecycle of this product. We will begin to uncover some of the hidden social and environmental costs that are often hidden from the general public.

  2. 2.

    You will pick one personal hygiene product (e.g., shampoo) and start developing a similar mind map. You can start by expressing what you know already based on what you learned from “The Story of Stuff” and the table that you completed in class. You are required to do some additional secondary research for your first mind map.

  3. 3.

    It’s important that you show the many links to various components (living/nonliving and hidden messages) for your product as well some of the social and environmental costs associated with your product.

  4. 4.

    Another great video to watch is ‘The Story of Cosmetics’ by Annie Leonard.

figure d

Lesson 4: Revising the Mind Map

figure e

Since the goal of this project is to address an STSE issue (or a few related STSE issues) in connection to the personal hygiene product you selected, you will first need to identify an issue, or issues, you feel is/are most relevant and most important to address through research-informed activism. You will need to revise your original mind map according to the instructions below.

1.1.2.1.1 Your Goal Is to
  1. 1.

    Revise your first mind map so that you group different components according to overall goals they have. For example, one might represent: advertisers, cell phone companies, people who often are seen using cell phones, stores that sell cell phones, etc. All of these may be aligned to support such common hidden messages like, cell phones are ‘cool,’ ‘sleek,’ ‘powerful,’ etc. You may put circles around groups of components that operate as a unit, or color code these components.

  2. 2.

    With another circle, or another colour, show living and non-living components that might tell a different story, which is often less prominent in society. For example, if we consider cell phones again, this might include: miners in developing countries, living things adversely affected by mining, people with cancer from cell phone energy waves, landfills with heaps of cell phones in them, etc. The components in this circle/or with this colour code—if it were more prominent - might send messages like, ‘cell phones are harmful/toxic,’ ‘they separate people from each other,’ etc.

  3. 3.

    Identify less prominent messages that may be important in society about your selected chemical product. For example, many personal hygiene products, like shampoos, contain some possible carcinogenic substances or neurotoxins which can affect our health. One or more of these less prominent messages will become the STSE issue(s) that you will address with your group through your choice of actions.

Lesson 5: Conducting primary research into your chemical product

figure f

Purpose

To plan and conduct an original investigation (e.g., a correlational study) about a personal hygiene product of your choice. It would be best if your investigation relates to one or more of the less prominent messages/STSE issues you identified.

1.1.2.1.2 Getting Started

List of possible investigations that your group can do:

  • Design an investigation to determine what smells/fragrances of soaps/shampoos are preferred by teenage boys and girls and how fragrance seems to be used as a marketing tool.

  • Evaluate various labeling claims used on several brand name products as acceptable or unacceptable (according to Heath Canada Guidelines for Labeling Claims: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pubs/indust/cosmet/index-eng.php#s2 ).

  • "If you can hook teens when they’re young, you have a customer for a lifetime," said Matt Britton, chief of brand development at Mr. Youth, a marketing firm. Design an investigation to study various methods that markers/advertisers use to entice teenage boys and girls to buy a particular product. For example, you may look at particular ads and determine if there is a difference in the way that boys vs. girls perceive these ads.

  • Design a controlled experiment to test stability of personal hygiene products (see http://www.intertek.com/beauty-products/testing/cosmetic-stability/). For example, for your product you may look at pH, viscosity, appearance/colour and odour at various conditions such as different temperatures, different amounts of light and/or free-thaw conditions.

  • Design and carry out a correlational study to determine how hypgeine products for girls and boys differ in hidden messages; e.g., how they make the user feel (refer to: http://www.beautypackaging.com/articles/2003/11/semiotics-research-deciphering-packaging-codes-rev)

  • Your idea…discuss it with the teacher and get it approved before beginning the investigation.

1.1.2.1.3 Developing a Method and Preparing for Your Investigation
  1. 1.

    After you decide which investigation you’d like to perform with your group, you need to first come up with method to conduct your investigation. Plan it so that its results may be ‘trustworthy’; e.g., valid and reliable.

  2. 2.

    Make sure that you show your method to your teacher before beginning the investigation.

  3. 3.

    As part of your preparation to conduct an investigation, you need to have all your materials ready. For example, if you conduct a study, you need to have your survey questions developed. If you are studying particular ads for your product, you need to have these ready as well.

1.1.2.1.4 Collecting and Analyzing Data
  1. 1.

    Remember that your data can be both qualitative (descriptive, no numbers used) and quantitative (usually numerical data). The type of investigation you chose will determine whether your data is qualitative and/or quantitative.

  2. 2.

    All data needs to be summarized in a properly labeled Table.

  3. 3.

    Quantitative data should be shown graphically—as a bar, line or pie graph.

  4. 4.

    Graphs should have titles with properly labeled axis.

1.1.2.1.5 Interpreting Data and Drawing Conclusions
  1. 1.

    You should make sense of what your results show by interpreting your results. Can your original focus question be answered using the data you collected? What does your data suggest? What conclusions can you make from your primary research?

  2. 2.

    What are some possible weaknesses in your investigation and how can they be addressed?

Lesson 6: Preparing for and taking action: Consumer Activism!

figure g

The last stage of your research-informed action project is to prepare for and take action to address an STSE issue related to the personal hygiene product you selected. You will be given one class period in which you will work with your group to propose and prepare for your actions. Your actions should be informed by both your secondary and primary research.

1.1.2.1.6 Your Goal Is to
  1. 1.

    Propose an action that your group can take to address the issue you identified.

  2. 2.

    Develop ready-to-use action materials. You will need to spend additional time outside of the designated class time to work on your ready-to-use action materials.

  3. 3.

    Present and defend your actions during a 10-muinute class presentation.

1.1.2.1.7 Ideas for Actions
  • A public service announcement about the health and environmental effects of chemicals in shampoos, or lead additives in cosmetics

  • An exposition/narrative about the lives of miners/factory workers affected during the extraction or production stages of development of your selected product

  • A letter to powerful groups (e.g., Health Canada) asking for better regulations of chemicals in everyday products

  • Students may propose safer/healthier and greener alternatives to some personal care products and develop a campaign to promote their use over other products

  • Other actions of your choice—get them approved by your teacher

What’s Assessed and Evaluated at the End of This Project:

At the end of this research-informed action project, you will be assessed and evaluated on the following components:

  1. (i)

    Initial and revised mind maps

  2. (ii)

    Results and conclusions of your primary investigation

  3. (iii)

    Ready-to-use action materials/actions you propose and take

  4. (iv)

    10 minute presentation defending your actions

Mirjan Krstovic, 2013

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bencze, L., Krstovic, M. (2017). Students’ Uses of Actor-Network Theory to Contextualize Socioscientific Actions. In: Bencze, L. (eds) Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55503-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55505-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics