Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 14))

Abstract

Many jurisdictions have urged educators to engage students in decision-making regarding socioscientific issues, such as debates about human uses of fossil fuels as contributions to climate change. Scholars argue, however, that students also need to take social actions—such as lobbying of power-brokers—to address issues. Experience indicates, however, that such a tack in formal schooling often meets structural barriers—such as tendencies to teach and assess/evaluat e pre-determined knowledge claims generated by the sciences. There is, nevertheless, evidence to suggest that student motivation to act can be enhanced when—based on use of the ‘STEPWISE’ curriculum and pedagogical framework—they self-direct research into relationships among fields of science and technology and societies and environments, results of which they use to inform their actions. In the study reported here, we added to such findings, suggesting—based on constant comparative analyses of qualitative data based on constructivist grounded theory—that students’ local social (correlational) studies influenced motivation for and foci of their socio-political actions. A particularly noteworthy finding appeared to be that commitment to student-directedness of the teacher involved in our study seemed to lead students to enhance their quantitative data with qualitative findings. These, in turn, appeared to contribute to students’ motivations to take social actions to bring about a better world. Implications for promotion of socio-political activism through school science are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific myth-conceptions. Science Education, 87(3), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, M. (2004). The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. L., Hammond, S. K., & Glantz, S. A. (2006). The tobacco industry’s role in the 16 Cities Study of Secondhand Tobacco Smoke: Do the data support the stated conclusions? Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(12), 1890–1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L. (1996). Correlational studies in school science: Breaking the science-experiment-certainty connection. School Science Review, 78(282), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L. (2000). Procedural apprenticeship in school science: Constructivist enabling of connoisseurship. Science Education, 84(6), 727–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L., & Sperling, E. R. (2012). Student-teachers as advocates for student-led research-informed socioscientific activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 12(1), 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ research-informed socioscientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of theory: Research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, W. L. P. (2009). Scientific literacy: A Freirean perspective as a radical view of humanistic science education. Science Education, 93(2), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortus, A., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2002). Social epistemology (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hileman, B. (1998). Industry’s privacy rights: Is science shortchanged? Chemical & Engineering News, 76(17), 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism and the climate. Toronto, Canada: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1993). Technology’s challenge to science education. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, A. (2010). The story of stuff: How our obsession with stuff is trashing the planet, our communities, and our health – And a vision for change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2013). Practice and theory of socio-scientific issues: An authentic model? Studies in Science Education, 49(10), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (1995). From manual training to technology education: The continuing struggle to establish a school subject in the USA. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(6), 621–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loving, C. C. (1991). The Scientific Theory Profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. (2013). The cancer stage of capitalism: From crisis to cure (2nd ed.). London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuaig, L., & Brooks, N. (2010). The trouble with billionaires. Toronto, Canada: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education [MoE]. (2008). The Ontario curriculum, grades 9 and 10: Science. Toronto, Canada: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. (2010). Merchants of doubt. London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy, J. R., & Krstovic, M. (2001). Later life learners: A significant and receptive audience for introductory astronomy. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 95, 205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2011). Neoliberalism and after?: Education, social policy and the crisis of Western capitalism. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S.L., & Verger, A. (2012). Governing education through Public Private Partnerships, published by the Centre for Globalisation, Education and Societies, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1JA, UK at: http://susanleerobertson.com/publications/

  • Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and trends. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of an argumentation intervention on Grade 10 students’ conceptual understanding of genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Bencze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bencze, L., Krstovic, M. (2017). Students’ Social Studies Influences on Their Socioscientific Actions. In: Bencze, L. (eds) Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55503-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55505-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics