Abstract
I believe that schools can serve as engines of social change, and can even be repurposed to serve progressive goals as shown by the STEPWISE project. However, much of the lessons and insights that STEPWISE offers may remain inaccessible unless read diffractively by critique and propelled through dialogue. It is in this spirit that this chapter critically examines the STEPWISE framework in light of its potential to offer the theoretical space and resources needed for evidence based, scientifically grounded understanding and collective democratic environmental and social justice activism. A critical part of coming to know the world relates to labeling the world, and officially sanctioned ontologies as reflected in official discourse of school science play an important role in shaping students’ views of the world. In this chapter, therefore, I compare and contrast the neoliberal ontology of the natural world as embedded in the mainstream, official science curricula in the United States with the ontology undergirding the STEPWISE framework to showcase the strengths and limitations of STEPWISE oriented science instruction for environmental action. I also discuss ways in which the STEPWISE framework can be further strengthened to better serve the goal of preparing students that can act as sharing, cooperative and public good maximizing homo reciprocans to create a more ecologically and socially just world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
‘STEPWISE’ is the acronym for Science & Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies & Environments. It is a theoretical and practical framework that organizes teaching/learning goals in ways that encourage and enable students to self-direct research-informed and negotiated actions to address personal, social and environmental problems linked to fields of science and technology. To learn more about this framework, refer to Chap. 2 in this book.
References
Archer, K. (2010). Social construction of nature. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geography (pp. 2558–2561). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., et al. (2011). Has the earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? [10.1038/nature09678]. Nature, 471(7336), 51–57.
Braun, B. (2006). Towards a new earth and a new humanity: Nature, ontology, politics. In N. Castree & D. Gregory (Eds.), David Harvey: A critical reader (pp. 191–222). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Brecher, J., Costello, T., & Smith, B. (2000). Globalization from below: The power of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. I. K. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.
Bridges, D. (2008). Educationalization: On the appropriateness of asking educational institutions to solve social and economic problems. Educational Theory, 58(4), 461–474.
Büscher, B. (2012). Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 10(1), 29.
Büscher, B., Dressler, W., & Fletcher, R. (2014). Nature inc.: Environmental conservation in the neoliberal age. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Carter, L. (2008). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education, 92(1), 165–181.
Carvalho, G. S., Tracana, R. B., Skujiene, G., & Turcinaviciene, J. (2011). Trends in environmental education images of textbooks from Western and Eastern European countries and non-European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2587–2610.
Castree, N. (2005). Nature. London/New York: Routledge.
Castree, N. (2008). Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations. Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 153.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity (Vol. 2). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University press.
Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391–428.
Clery, D. (2007). U.K. Science Adviser offers some parting shots. Science, 318(5858), 1862–1863.
Cobern, W. W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: A worldview investigation of important concepts students use to make sense of nature with specific attention to science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 20(3), 247.
Dewey, J., Hickman, L., & Alexander, T. M. (1998). The essential Dewey: Pragmatism, education, democracy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1754), 20122845.
Fendler, L. (2008). New and improved educationalising: Faster, more powerful and longer lasting. Ethics and Education, 3(1), 15–26.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366.
Fraser, N. (1995). False antitheses. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 59–74). New York: Routledge.
Galvan, R. T. (2005). Transnational communities en La Lucha: Campesinas and grassroots organizations “globalizing from below”. Journal of Latinos & Education, 4(1), 3–20.
Gardner, H. (2011). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hempel, L. C. (1996). Environmental governance: The global challenge. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Heynen, N. (2007). Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. New York: Routledge.
James, M. (2013). Neoliberal heritage redress. In J. A. Henderson & P. Wakeham (Eds.), Reconciling Canada: Critical perspectives on the culture of redress (pp. 31–62). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Korfiatis, K. J., Stamou, A. G., & Paraskevopoulos, S. (2004). Images of nature in greek primary school textbooks. Science Education, 88(1), 72–89.
Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–460.
Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 17(3/4), 445–459.
Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications, 4, 1396.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: International Publishers Company, Incorporated.
McKinney, M. L., Schoch, R. M., & Yonavjak, L. (2012). Environmental science: Systems and solutions. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.
Moore, J. W. (2011). Transcending the metabolic rift: A theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 1–46.
Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., & Shonkoff, S. B. (2009). The climate gap. Los Angeles: USC Center for sustainable cities, University of Southern California.
Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Arguing from Nature: The role of ‘nature’ in students’ argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723–744.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Sharma, A., & Buxton, C. A. (2015). Human–nature relationships in school science: A critical discourse analysis of a middle-grade science textbook. Science Education, 99(2), 260–281.
Sharma, A. (2013, April). Where are the people? Understanding representations of society-nature relationships in a middle grades science classroom. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Sharma, A. (2012). Global climate change: What has science education got to do with it? Science & Education, 21(1), 33–53.
Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Stern, N. (2009). The global deal: Climate change and the creation of a new era of progress and prosperity. New York: Public Affairs.
Treanor, B. (2010). Environmentalism and public virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1), 9–28.
Vandermeer, J. H., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity: The political ecology of rain forest destruction. Oakland, CA/New York: Food First Books.
West, C. R. (1999). The Cornel West reader. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of nature: Problems in materialism and culture (pp. 67–85). London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, A. (2017). Countering the Neoliberal Ontology of Nature: The STEPWISE Option. In: Bencze, L. (eds) Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55503-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55505-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)