Skip to main content

Countering the Neoliberal Ontology of Nature: The STEPWISE Option

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 829 Accesses

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 14))

Abstract

I believe that schools can serve as engines of social change, and can even be repurposed to serve progressive goals as shown by the STEPWISE project. However, much of the lessons and insights that STEPWISE offers may remain inaccessible unless read diffractively by critique and propelled through dialogue. It is in this spirit that this chapter critically examines the STEPWISE framework in light of its potential to offer the theoretical space and resources needed for evidence based, scientifically grounded understanding and collective democratic environmental and social justice activism. A critical part of coming to know the world relates to labeling the world, and officially sanctioned ontologies as reflected in official discourse of school science play an important role in shaping students’ views of the world. In this chapter, therefore, I compare and contrast the neoliberal ontology of the natural world as embedded in the mainstream, official science curricula in the United States with the ontology undergirding the STEPWISE framework to showcase the strengths and limitations of STEPWISE oriented science instruction for environmental action. I also discuss ways in which the STEPWISE framework can be further strengthened to better serve the goal of preparing students that can act as sharing, cooperative and public good maximizing homo reciprocans to create a more ecologically and socially just world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘STEPWISE’ is the acronym for Science & Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies & Environments. It is a theoretical and practical framework that organizes teaching/learning goals in ways that encourage and enable students to self-direct research-informed and negotiated actions to address personal, social and environmental problems linked to fields of science and technology. To learn more about this framework, refer to Chap. 2 in this book.

References

  • Archer, K. (2010). Social construction of nature. In B. Warf (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geography (pp. 2558–2561). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., et al. (2011). Has the earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? [10.1038/nature09678]. Nature, 471(7336), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B. (2006). Towards a new earth and a new humanity: Nature, ontology, politics. In N. Castree & D. Gregory (Eds.), David Harvey: A critical reader (pp. 191–222). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, J., Costello, T., & Smith, B. (2000). Globalization from below: The power of solidarity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. I. K. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. (2008). Educationalization: On the appropriateness of asking educational institutions to solve social and economic problems. Educational Theory, 58(4), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, B. (2012). Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 10(1), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, B., Dressler, W., & Fletcher, R. (2014). Nature inc.: Environmental conservation in the neoliberal age. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2008). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education, 92(1), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, G. S., Tracana, R. B., Skujiene, G., & Turcinaviciene, J. (2011). Trends in environmental education images of textbooks from Western and Eastern European countries and non-European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2587–2610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2005). Nature. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2008). Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects, and evaluations. Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity (Vol. 2). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clery, D. (2007). U.K. Science Adviser offers some parting shots. Science, 318(5858), 1862–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: A worldview investigation of important concepts students use to make sense of nature with specific attention to science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 20(3), 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., Hickman, L., & Alexander, T. M. (1998). The essential Dewey: Pragmatism, education, democracy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1754), 20122845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (2008). New and improved educationalising: Faster, more powerful and longer lasting. Ethics and Education, 3(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). False antitheses. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 59–74). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvan, R. T. (2005). Transnational communities en La Lucha: Campesinas and grassroots organizations “globalizing from below”. Journal of Latinos & Education, 4(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2011). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, L. C. (1996). Environmental governance: The global challenge. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N. (2007). Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. (2013). Neoliberal heritage redress. In J. A. Henderson & P. Wakeham (Eds.), Reconciling Canada: Critical perspectives on the culture of redress (pp. 31–62). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korfiatis, K. J., Stamou, A. G., & Paraskevopoulos, S. (2004). Images of nature in greek primary school textbooks. Science Education, 88(1), 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 17(3/4), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications, 4, 1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: International Publishers Company, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. L., Schoch, R. M., & Yonavjak, L. (2012). Environmental science: Systems and solutions. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W. (2011). Transcending the metabolic rift: A theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., & Shonkoff, S. B. (2009). The climate gap. Los Angeles: USC Center for sustainable cities, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Arguing from Nature: The role of ‘nature’ in students’ argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., & Buxton, C. A. (2015). Human–nature relationships in school science: A critical discourse analysis of a middle-grade science textbook. Science Education, 99(2), 260–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. (2013, April). Where are the people? Understanding representations of society-nature relationships in a middle grades science classroom. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. (2012). Global climate change: What has science education got to do with it? Science & Education, 21(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2009). The global deal: Climate change and the creation of a new era of progress and prosperity. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treanor, B. (2010). Environmentalism and public virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. H., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity: The political ecology of rain forest destruction. Oakland, CA/New York: Food First Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. R. (1999). The Cornel West reader. New York: Basic Civitas Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of nature: Problems in materialism and culture (pp. 67–85). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharma, A. (2017). Countering the Neoliberal Ontology of Nature: The STEPWISE Option. In: Bencze, L. (eds) Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55503-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55505-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics