Abstract
In this chapter I use the context of a school community garden to analyze the potential and limitations of the STEPWISE framework. Drawing on work I have done with 7th and 8th grade science students, teachers, and communities I examine the pedagogical implications of using nonhuman plants as pedagogical actors. Specifically this chapter looks at how plant actors can offer an alternative epistemological standpoint from which to learn about socioscientific issues (SSI) controversies such as genetically engineered food. One question this chapter poses is how learning from plants such as corn provides/creates an actor network approach to teaching and learning in food desert communities. Along these same lines, I ask whether an actor network approach can potentially lead to effective STSE action for students around social movements such as food justice in their communities. Finally, the chapter explores how situating teaching and learning alongside plant actors can help achieve one of the primary goals of the STEPWISE framework which is to “develop more realistic conceptions about relationships among fields of STSE”. Moving toward more “realistic conceptions” about STSE controversies, I suggest, requires students, teachers and communities to map the constellation of actors (e.g., GE food corporations, governmental actors, agricultural laws, food systems, etc.) in biocapitalist society that shape our everyday experiences with actors such as corn laden food products.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Lawrence Bencze’s website that provides an overview and examples of how to apply the STEPWISE approach in classrooms available here: www.stepwiser.ca/ Also please see Chap. 2 in this book for a more detailed description of STEPWISE as a science education approach.
- 2.
In the design of the critical food literacy curriculum project we as researchers are not starting from a rigid or clearly defined definition of what a critical food literacy will look like for each student. Instead, following ANT, critical food literacy may mean different things to different students depending on the actors and specific type of inquiry they follow as well as the local context from which the research is being done. However this is not to say that there will not be generalizable aspects to what a critical food literacy should include. For example, as our framing of the curriculum itself reflects, emphasis on research within a food justice framework that uses ANT as a method of analysis gives great importance to the actor networks that govern students and communities’ food lives such as high-end grocery corporation’s decision to not build stores in working class and communities of color.
References
Alkon, A. H., & Agyeman, J. (2011). The food movement as polyculture. In A. H. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bencze, J. L. (2008). Private profit, science, and science education: Critical problems and possibilities for action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 8(4), 297–312.
Bencze, J.L. (2014). ‘STEPWISE’: Science & technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies, & environments: A summary for science teachers. Available http://webspace.oise.utoronto.ca/~benczela/STEPWISE_Sumry4Tchrs.pdf
Bencze, J. L., & Alsop, S. (2014). Afterword: Toward technoscience education for healthier networks of being. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9, 607–622.
Bencze, J. L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669.
Bencze, J. L., & Sperling, E. R. (2012). Student teachers as advocates for student-led research-informed socioscientific activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 12(1), 62–85.
Erickson, P., & Lazarus, M. (2014). Impact of the Keystone XL pipeline on global oil markets and greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4, 778–781.
Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hodson, D. (1994). Seeking directions for change: The personalisation and politicisation of science education. Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 71–98.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. New York: Pluto Press.
IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
Mari Gallagher Research & Consulting Group. (2007). Examining the impact of food deserts on public health in detroit. Available from: http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/policy/detroitfooddesertreport.pdf
McClintock, N. (2011). From industrial garden to food desert: Demarcated devaluation in the flatlands of Oakland, California. In A. H. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability (pp. 89–120). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Montgomery, S. L. (1994). Minds for the making: The role of science in American education, 1750–1990. New York: Guilford.
Mueller, M. P. (2011). Ecojustice in science education: leaving the classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 351–360.
Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral–ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues (SSI). In Cultural studies and environmentalism (pp. 105–128). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Pierce, C. (2007). Designing intelligent knowledge: Epistemological faith and the democratization of science. Educational Theory, 57(2), 123–140.
Pierce, C. (2012). The promissory futures of education: Rethinking scientific literacy in the era of biocapitalism. Educational Theory and Philosophy, 44(7), 721–745.
Pierce, C. (2013). Learning about a fish from an ANT: Actor network theory and postgenomic science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(1), 83–107.
Pierce, C. (2015). Against neoliberal pedagogies of plants and people: Mapping actor networks of biocapital in learning gardens. Environmental Education Research, 21(1), 460–477.
Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92, 389–403.
Weinstein, M. (2009). Bodies out of control: Rethinking science texts. New York: Peter Lang.
Williams, D. R., & Brown, J. D. (2012). Learning gardens and sustainability education: Bringing life to schools and schools to life. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pierce, C. (2017). Actor Network Theory and STEPWISE: A Case Study on Learning About Food Justice with Plants. In: Bencze, L. (eds) Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55503-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55505-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)