Skip to main content

The Missing Link: The Innovation Gap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bridging the Innovation Gap

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

The analysis aimed at revealing the specific location in the innovation process where innovation typically fails shows that significant parts of reality were likely not considered by those who presented the conventional funnel model of the innovation process. We refer to the most important missing component as the innovation gap .

All illustrations are published with the kind permission of © Heiner Kaufmann, Daniel Huber, and Martin Steinmann. All Rights Reserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This seems quite plausible because it is the course of least resistance. For various reasons, it takes courage to officially terminate a project. One prefers on the one hand to avoid demotivating employees. On the other hand, the gradual suffocation of projects may also be a sign of a basic uncertainty or a lack of understanding. One simply does not know how to approach uncomfortable and incalculable projects.

  2. 2.

    The market introduction phase is characterized by an implicit compulsion to keep going forward, so as to justify and protect substantial investments. One prefers to give it a run and let the market decide. Market failure is easier to accept for the project team and easier to communicate to the executive board.

  3. 3.

    While there are key data that can be used to measure innovative capacity, these tend to be rather indirect (e.g. sales of products that have been on the market for less than 2 years) and their significance is therefore limited. This is why the identification of key data for innovation has remained a subject of research in its own right.

  4. 4.

    TIME = telecommunications, IT, media and entertainment.

  5. 5.

    Swisscom Innovations (previously known as Swisscom Research and Development).

  6. 6.

    Fuzzy frontend refers to the often unclear first two phases of the innovation process (see e.g. Boeddrich 2004 or Kahn 2012, p. 450).

  7. 7.

    We selected an English term because English was the company language. Moreover, a few authors have detected and referred to similar problem in this area. Walter Hehl, for instance, refers to a difficult phase in the same area in German as the “Innovationslücke” (in Hehl and Willmanns 2009, p. 16) and Thomas Hinderling from CSEM speaks of the valley of death in connection with startups (Hinderling 2013).

  8. 8.

    The role of the account manager is a typical role in virtually all sales departments (see Capon 2001).

  9. 9.

    See also http://www.myersbriggs.org, as referenced on May 30, 2014.

  10. 10.

    See http://www.keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=3&c=overview, (as referenced on April 6, 2010).

  11. 11.

    See http://www.keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=3&c=overview (as referenced on April 6, 2010) and http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/overview_temperaments.asp (as referenced on April 16, 2014). The older description used here from Keirsey.com from the year 2010 (http://www.keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=3&c=overview) appears to us to be clearer and therefore more appropriate for our present purposes.

References

  • Boeddrich, H.-J. (2004). Ideas in the workplace: A new approach towards organizing the fuzzy front end of the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capon, N. (2001). Key account management and planning. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s Dilemma. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, G. (2000). Wild Duck. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hehl, W., & Willmanns, R. (2009). Paradoxa und Praxis im Innovationsmanagement. Munich: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinderling. (2013). http://www.kmu.admin.ch/aktuell/00524/00730/01247/index.html?lang=de. As referenced on May 11, 2013.

  • Kahn, K. B. (2012). The PDMA handbook of new product development. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. A. (1995). Inside the Tornado. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers-Briggs, I. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Palo Alto: Davies-Black Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huber, D., Kaufmann, H., Steinmann, M. (2017). The Missing Link: The Innovation Gap. In: Bridging the Innovation Gap. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55498-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics