Skip to main content

The Causal Interpretation and Causality and Chance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
David Bohm: Causality and Chance, Letters to Three Women
  • 605 Accesses

Abstract

In spite of the book’s acclaim, as the letters show, Bohm was not satisfied that he had dealt adequately with the philosophical issues from the standpoint of Marxism. In a relatively short period at Princeton, in the year before leaving for Brazil, he developed his alternative “hidden variable”, or “causal”, as it was later called, approach to quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Freire Jr. (2015), pp. 31–32 for more on this.

  2. 2.

    Bohm (1952a,b).

  3. 3.

    It was probably mainly this pragmatism and inherent conservatism that prevented Bohm from making a greater impact, though widespread anti-communism certainly also played a part. See Freire (2005) for a discussion on this issue.

  4. 4.

    References to letters throughout this introduction are given in the form (X,Y, p. Z) where X is the chapter in Part 2, Y the letter number, and Z the page number.

  5. 5.

    There are several references in the letters to Miriam Yevick in 1952 to the difficulties in writing a proposed book on philosophy. Then, in February 1953 (26, 96, p. 317), he tells Miriam he is experimenting with a number of ideas, which he may publish first as articles. A little later, he writes to Melba Phillips about a book gradually taking shape (18, 42, p. 163) and thanks her for efforts in trying to get a “paper” on causality published (18, 45, p. 169). In April 1954, he tells Miriam that his book has been accepted by Routledge and Kegan Paul (30, 116, p. 395), and in August (31, 120, p. 414), he has a six-page summary of his ideas on probability (not found in the archives). Finally, in October 1955 (19, 52, p. 180), he writes to Melba that the publishers have asked him to shorten the book, cutting out some technical material, and he also decides to cut out material on positivism. The revised version, with five chapters remaining, is probably the book in its present form.

  6. 6.

    Bohm (1957).

  7. 7.

    This is not to dismiss the work of Soviet physicists such as V.A. Fock (see Graham (1971), especially Chap. III), but they were working under even more disadvantageous circumstances than Bohm, as we will attempt to show in Chap. 12 on Soviet Physics and Philosophy.

  8. 8.

    Bohm (1957), Chap. 5, especially Sect. 12.

  9. 9.

    Bohm (1957), Chap. 4, Sect. 3.

  10. 10.

    As Bohm wrote in his second 1952 paper: “We should never expect to obtain a complete theory of this structure [the objectively real world of unlimited complexity]” (Bohm 1952b), and in 1953: “It is true that this model is somewhat crude, and that a deeper synthesis should be sought” (18, 43, p. 165).

  11. 11.

    Bohm (1957), Chap. 4, Sect. 5.

  12. 12.

    Though many writers appear to think it does. See Rosenblum and Kuttner (2011) for a recent example.

References

  • Bohm, D. (1952a). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables i. Physical Review, 85(2), 166–179.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1952b). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables ii. Physical Review, 85(2), 180–193.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1957). Causality and chance in modern physics (first ed., p. 1984). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (Second edition with new preface by Bohm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, O., Jr. (2005). Science and exile: David Bohm, the hot times of the Cold war, and his struggle for a new interpretation of quantum mechanics. Historical Studies on the Physical and Biological Sciences, 36(1). Also at http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508184.

  • Freire, O., Jr. (2015). The quantum dissidents: Rebuilding the foundations of quantum mechanics (1950–1990). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. R. (1971). Science and philosophy in the Soviet Union. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, B., & Kuttner, F. (2011). Quantum enigma: Physics encounters consciousness. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Talbot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talbot, C. (2017). The Causal Interpretation and Causality and Chance. In: Talbot, C. (eds) David Bohm: Causality and Chance, Letters to Three Women. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55492-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics