Skip to main content

White House Under Attack

Introducing Distributional Semantic Models for the Analysis of US Crisis Communication Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Data Science and Social Research

Abstract

In the present contribution, the use of distributional semantic models (DSMs) is proposed as a novel approach for the analysis of crisis communication strategies. Temporal Random Indexing (TRI), a specific DSM framework, is employed as computational tool to analyse word meaning change over time. Our resource is represented by the CompWHoB (Computational White House press Briefings) Corpus, a political diachronic corpus collecting the transcripts of the White House Press Briefings from 1993 to 2014. Primary objective of this paper is to demonstrate that TRI can be used in conjunction with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) theories as an easily adaptable tool applicable to the analysis of the so-called crisis communication management moments where US administration has to cope with risky and serious scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Department of Physics, University of Napoli Federico II.

  2. 2.

    The CompWHoB Corpus is planned to be extended to the end of the Obama second term presidency.

  3. 3.

    Global Terrorism Database—http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/.

  4. 4.

    Temporal Random Indexing—https://github.com/pippokill/tri.

  5. 5.

    FrameNet Project—https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/.

References

  • Auriemma, M., Esposito, E., Iadicicco, L., Marrazzo, F., Polimene, A., Punziano, G., et al. (2015). Euroscetticismo a 5 Stelle: Stili comunicativi e online text data nel caso delle elezioni europee 2014. Sociologia della Comunicazione.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998, August). The berkeley framenet project. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 86-90). Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroni, M., & Lenci, A. (2010). Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4), 673–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, P., Caputo, A., & Semeraro, G. (2014, December). Analysing word meaning over time by exploiting temporal random indexing. In The First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2014 (p. 38).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigadir, I., Greene, D., Cunningham, P., & (2015, July). Analyzing discourse communities with distributional semantic models. In ACM Web Science 2015 Conference, 28 June–1 July 2015, Oxford. United Kingdom: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, E., Tran, N. K., & Baroni, M. (2014). Multimodal distributional semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 49, (1–47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate reputation review, 10(3), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, F., Basile, P., Cutugno, F., & Venuti, M. (2015, December). The CompWHoB Corpus: Computational Construction, Annotation and Linguistic Analysis of the White House Press Briefings Corpus. In Proceedings of the Second Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2015 (p. 120). Accademia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional structure. Word, 10(2–3), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. J. (2007). Managing the president’s message. The White House communication operations Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 3111–3119).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Vieweg, S. (2014, June). CrisisLex: A lexicon for collecting and filtering microblogged communications in crises. In ICWSM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., & Seeger, W. M. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of health communication, 10(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., (1992). Lectures on conversations (Vols. 1 and 2). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperberg-McQueen, C. M., & Burnard, L. (2007). TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinzi, C., & Venuti, M. (2013). Tracking the change in an institutional genre: A diachronic corpus-based study of white house press briefings. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Esposito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Esposito, F., Esposito, E., Basile, P. (2017). White House Under Attack. In: Lauro, N., Amaturo, E., Grassia, M., Aragona, B., Marino, M. (eds) Data Science and Social Research. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55477-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics