Skip to main content

Modeling and Analysis of Glass Ceiling and Power Inequality in Bi-populated Societies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
3rd International Winter School and Conference on Network Science (NetSci-X 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

This paper attempts to rigorously analyze the social effects of power inequality and glass ceiling in a society with two populations (e.g. men and women). To this end, we define a mathematical model based on a social network with two populations, in which these phenomena are studied. We define measures for Normalized (or Differential) Power Inequality and Full-Spectrum Glass Ceiling, and formalize the conditions for their existence in terms of three societal parameters, the relative size of the two populations, the level of homophily, and the extent of the “leaky pipeline” phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Much of the discussion in this paper applies also to minorities; however, for simplicity of presentation we will henceforth restrict the discussion to gender, and denote the two sub-populations as the “red” (women) and “blue” (men) communities, R and B.

  2. 2.

    Throughout, we interpret x∕0 =  for x > 0.

  3. 3.

    A poignant variation of this observation is widely known as the Peter Principle.

  4. 4.

    For example, a measure acceptable in the eyes of the law.

  5. 5.

    This is not necessarily true for all plausible models. For example, some natural models might assign more weight to vacations/leaves that take place early in the career.

References

  1. Avin, C., Keller, B., Lotker, Z., Mathieu, C., Peleg, D., Pignolet, Y.-A.: Homophily and the glass ceiling effect in social networks. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conf. on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 41–50 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M.: Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 275–279 (2010). doi:10.1177/0963721410383241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M., Barnett, S.M.: Women’s underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychol. Bull. 135 (2), 218 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotter, D.A., Hermsen, J.M., Ovadia, S., Vanneman, R.: The glass ceiling effect. Soc. Forces 80 (2), 655–681 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diekman, A.B., Brown, E.R., Johnston, A.M., Clark, E.K.: Seeking congruity between goals and roles a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychol. Sci. 21 (8), 1051–1057 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Federal Glass Ceiling Commission: Solid Investments: Making Full Use of the Nation’s Human Capital, p. 4 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Griffith, A.L.: Persistence of women and minorities in stem field majors: is it the school that matters? Econ. Educ. Rev. 29 (6), 911–922 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gürer, D., Camp, T.: Investigating the incredible shrinking pipeline for women in computer science. Final report–NSF project, 9812016 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 1549/13).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinon Nahum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Avin, C., Lotker, Z., Nahum, Y., Peleg, D. (2017). Modeling and Analysis of Glass Ceiling and Power Inequality in Bi-populated Societies. In: Shmueli, E., Barzel, B., Puzis, R. (eds) 3rd International Winter School and Conference on Network Science . NetSci-X 2017. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55471-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics