Skip to main content

Community Well-Being or Quality of Place? A Few Notes and Their Application in Czech Republic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Dimensions in Community Well-Being

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

Abstract

Community well-being is an umbrella term for different ways of describing community development. The combination of words community and well-being is a result of the application of the psychological term well-being to territorial planning, or generally, to a geographical context. This paper includes an analysis of the concept of well-being in its original psychological context, and an assessment of the suitability of its application in the form of community well-being. Quality of life, in our understanding, is based on the examination of a good life. In psychology and other sciences oriented towards the subjective dimension of quality of life, the attention is focused on ‘how’ a person lives his/her life; on the other hand, in geography and other sciences oriented towards the objective dimension of quality of life, the attention is focused on ‘where’ a person lives his/her life, i.e. the ‘place’. The key element of the geography of quality of life is the phenomenon of a ‘good place’ as a place, where a good life is lived. The described approach provides a framework for the analysis of different-size groups of municipalities and small towns, using self-reported evaluations of the quality of life of their inhabitants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some authors (Michalos 2014; Veenhoven 2014a) use the term ‘qualities of life’.

References

  • Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2008). The art of life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blažek, J., & Uhlíř, D. (2011). Teorie regionálního rozvoje. Praha, Czech: Karolinum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, D. (2015). The blue zones solution: Eating and living like the world’s healthiest people. Washington, DC: National Geographic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrett, J. (2009). Measuring quality of life in Canadian municipalities. In Sirgy, J. M., Phillips, R., & Ratz, D. (2009). Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases III (pp. 155–164). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, S., Larson, L., & Jambeck, J. (2014). Are sustainable cities ‘‘happy’’ cities? Associations between sustainable development and human well-being in urban areas of the United States. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16, 633–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, S., & Pfeiffe, D. (2015). Sustainability through happiness: A framework for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 23(5), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2013). Measuring happiness and subjective well-being. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayers (Eds.), The oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 185–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Weinberg, M. K. (2014). Australian unity longitudinal wellbeing study. Melbourne: Deakin University, Australian Centre on Quality of Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Acci, L. (2014). Well-being and progress Measurement. In Michalos A. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7062–7070). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M. (2014). Community indicators Victoria. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1066–1069). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Džuka, J. (2014). Wellbeing in Slovakia. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds), Global handbook of quality of life. Exploration of well-being of nations and continents (pp. 663–684). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Džuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2006). The belief in a just world and subjective well-being in old age. Aging & Mental Health., 10(5), 439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyles, J., & Williams, A. (2008). Introduction. In J. Eyles & A. Williams (Eds.), Sense of place, health and quality of life. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers, P., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, A. (2010). Approaches to improving the quality of life. How to enhance the quality of life?. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer, W., & Gulyas, J. (2014). Well-being and ill-being: Names and naming. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7051–7056). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (2009). Community. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts, & S. Whatmore (Eds), The dictionary of human geography (5th ed.) (pp. 103–104). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamplová, D. (2015). Proč potřebujeme rodinu, práci a přátele. Fortuna Libri: Štěstí ze sociologické perspektivy. In Czech. Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heřmanová, E. (2012). Koncepty, teorie a měřění kvality života. Praha, Czech: SLON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ira, V., & Andráško, I. (2008). Quality of life in the urban environment of Bratislava: Two time-spatial perspectives. Geografický časopis, 60(2), 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacyno, M. (2012). Kultura individualizmu. Praha, Czech: SLON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubcová, A., Grežo, H., Hrešková, A., & Petrovič, F. (2016). Impacts of flooding on the quality of life in rural regions of Southern Slovakia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(1), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, B., & Kelly, I. W. (2014). Community life measures, quality. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1070–1073). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • John, L., & Wright, R. (2005). Quality of life and subjective well-being: Historical, conceptual and methodological clarification. Social Work in Mental Health, 4, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juvin, H., & Lipovetsky, G. (2010). L’occident mondialisé: Controverse sur la culture planétaire 1. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraeger, P., & Dahlstrom, T. (2014). Establishing community-based organizations. In R. Phillips & R. Pittman (Eds.), An introduction to community development. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., Kim, Y., & Phillips, R. (2015). Exploring the intersection of community well-being and community development. In S. J. Lee, Y. Kim, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Community well-being and community development (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky, G. (1983). L’ère du vide: Essais sur l’individualisme contemporain. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 11–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggino, F. (2015). Introduction. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A new research agenda for improvements in quality of life (pp. 1–7). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2014). Quality of life, two-variable theory. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5307–5309). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Ramsey, D., Eberts, D., & Kohlke, P. M. (2012). Good health is not the same as a good life: Survey results from Brandon, Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 107, 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., & Robinson, S. R. (2012). The good life: Eighth century to third century BCE. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 23–62). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2013). Well-being and public policy. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayers (Eds), The oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 517–534). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgaš, F. (2009). Quality of life and its spatial differentiation in Slovakia. Geografický časopis, 61(2), 121–138. [In Slovak].

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgaš, F. (2012). Prostorová dimenze kvality života. Liberec, Czech: Technická univerzita v Liberci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgaš, F., & Klobučník, M. (2016). Municipalities and regions as good places to live: Index of quality of life in the Czech Republic. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(2), 553–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of life. Concept, policy and practice. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2014a). Building community well-being across sectors with “for benefit” community business. In S. J. Lee, Y. Kim, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Community well-being and community development (pp. 25–38). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2014b). Community economic development. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1052–1053). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L., & Friedman, Ph H. (2012). Spirituality, religiosity, and subjective quality of life. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 313–330). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., & Cantarero, R. (2014). Community satisfaction. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1094–1099). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potůček, M., et al. (2002). Průvodce krajinou priorit pro Českou republiku. Praha, Czech: Centrum pro sociální a ekonomické strategie, Univerzita Karlova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research. A critical introduction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (2009). The increasing importance of quality of life. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(6), 779–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandøe, P. (1999). Quality of life—Three competing views. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. M., Phillips, R., & Ratz, D. (2009a). Community quality-of-Life indicators: Best cases III. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. M., Phillips, R., & Ratz, D. (2009b). Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases IV. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. M., Phillips, R., & Ratz, D. (2011). Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases V. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. M., Phillips, R., & Ratz, D. (2013). Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases VI. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J. M., Ratz, D., & Swain, D. (2006). Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases II. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2011). Trillion-dollar brain drain. Enormous costs of mental health problems in Europe not matched in research investment. Nature News, 478, 15, Publisher on line 4. October 2011. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111004/full/478015a.html

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives. Why GDP doesn’t add up. London and New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, C. A. (2015). Making the ordinary extraordinary: A fresh look at satisfaction in communities. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A new research agenda for improvements in quality of life (pp. 61–86). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, V. (2014). Well-being, philosophical theories of. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7110–7113). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaney, J. (2015). Region and place III well-being. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/0309132515601775

  • Veenhoven, R. (2012). Happiness, also known as “Life satisfaction” and “Subjective well-being”. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 63–78). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2013). Notions of the good life. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayers (Eds), The oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 161–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2014a). Quality of life, an overview. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5265–5269). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2014b). Well-Being in nations. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7096–7098). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, B. (2012). The top five regrets of the dying: A life transformed by the dearly departing. Carlsbad, CA: Hay Hose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J., & Brasher, K. (2008). Community wellbeing in an unwell world: Trends, challenges, and possibilities. Journal of Public Health Policy, 29, 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the SGS grant of Faculty of Science, Humanities and Education Technical University of Liberec, project No 21105 and the research project APVV-0018-12 “Human geography and demography interactions, nodes and contradictions in time-space network.” We would like to express our very great appreciation to Mrs. Catherine E. Dimmock-Benko, B. Ed., M. A, external teacher at the Department of Languages, for her willingness to provide the linguistic correction of this article. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their critical evaluation to enhance the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to František Murgaš .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murgaš, F., Klobučník, M. (2017). Community Well-Being or Quality of Place? A Few Notes and Their Application in Czech Republic. In: Kraeger, P., Cloutier, S., Talmage, C. (eds) New Dimensions in Community Well-Being. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55408-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55408-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55407-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55408-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics