Advertisement

Spatial Prediction of Landslide-Prone Areas Through k-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm and Logistic Regression Model Using High Resolution Airborne Laser Scanning Data

  • Biswajeet PradhanEmail author
  • Mustafa Neamah Jebur
Chapter

Abstract

Rapid urban growth and climate change in recent years have resulted in many environmental problems and increased risks due to natural disasters.

Keywords

Support Vector Machine Analytic Hierarchy Process Landslide Susceptibility Area Under Curve Landslide Occurrence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akgun, A. (2012). A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: A case study at İzmir, Turkey. Landslides, 9, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Althuwaynee, O. F., Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2012). Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 44, 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antronico, L., Borrelli, L., Coscarelli, R., & Gullà, G. (2015). Time evolution of landslide damages to buildings: The case study of Lungro (Calabria, southern Italy). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayalew, L., & Yamagishi, H. (2005). The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, 65, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., & Ugawa, N. (2004). Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano river, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides, 1, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brahim-Belhouari, S., Bermak, A., Shi, M., & Chan, P. C. (2005). Fast and robust gas identification system using an integrated gas sensor technology and gaussian mixture models. IEEE Sensors Journal, 5, 1433–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, K.-T., Chiang, S.-H., & Hsu, M.-L. (2007). Modeling typhoon-and earthquake-induced landslides in a mountainous watershed using logistic regression. Geomorphology, 89, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chau, K., Wu, C., & Li, Y. (2005). Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chauhan, S., Sharma, M., & Arora, M. K. (2010). Landslide susceptibility zonation of the Chamoli region, Garhwal Himalayas, using logistic regression model. Landslides, 7, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y.-R., Yeh, C.-H., & Yu, B. (2011). Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, 59, 1261–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, G., Guo, L., Zhao, T., Han, J., Li, H., & Fang, J. (2013). Automatic landslide detection from remote-sensing imagery using a scene classification method based on BoVW and pLSA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi, J., Oh, H.-J., Won, J.-S., & Lee, S. (2010). Validation of an artificial neural network model for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Souza, F. T., & Ebecken, N. F. (2012). A data based model to predict landslide induced by rainfall in Rio de Janeiro city. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dehnavi, A., Aghdam, I. N., Pradhan, B., & Varzandeh, M. H. M. (2015). A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. Catena, 135, 122–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felicísimo, Á. M., Cuartero, A., Remondo, J., & Quirós, E. (2013). Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: A comparative study. Landslides, 10, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiorucci, F., Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Cardinali, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2015). Integration of landslide susceptibility products in the environmental plans. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 17, pp 12404).Google Scholar
  17. Franco-Lopez, H., Ek, A. R., & Bauer, M. E. (2001). Estimation and mapping of forest stand density, volume, and cover type using the k-nearest neighbors method. Remote Sensing of Environment, 77, 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Günther, A., Reichenbach, P., Malet, J.-P., Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Hervás, J., Dashwood, C., et al. (2013). Tier-based approaches for landslide susceptibility assessment in Europe. Landslides, 10, 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guzzetti, F., Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., & Reichenbach, P. (1999). Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology, 31, 181–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hassaballa, A. A., Althuwaynee, O. F., & Pradhan, B. (2013). Extraction of soil moisture from RADARSAT-1 and its role in the formation of the 6 December 2008 landslide at Bukit Antarabangsa, Kuala Lumpur. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  21. Huabin, W., Gangjun, L., Weiya, X., & Gonghui, W. (2005). GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: An overview. Progress in Physical Geography, 29, 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jang, J.-S. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23, 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jebur, M., Pradhan, B., & Tehrany, M. (2014a). Manifestation of LiDAR-derived parameters in the spatial prediction of landslides using novel ensemble evidential belief functions and support vector machine models in GIS. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(2), 674–690.Google Scholar
  24. Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., & Tehrany, M. S. (2014b). Detection of vertical slope movement in highly vegetated tropical area of Gunung pass landslide, Malaysia, using L-band InSAR technique. Geosciences Journal, 18, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., & Tehrany, M. S. (2014c). Optimization of landslide conditioning factors using very high-resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) data at catchment scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152, 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katila, M., & Tomppo, E. (2001). Selecting estimation parameters for the Finnish multisource national forest inventory. Remote Sens Environment, 76, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kavzoglu, T., Sahin, E. K., & Colkesen, I. (2014). Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Landslides, 11, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, S., & Pradhan, B. (2007). Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides, 4, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marjanović, M., Bajat, B., Kovačević, M. (2009). Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms. In: Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, 2009. INCOS’09. International Conference on (pp 273–278).Google Scholar
  30. Moonjun, R. (2007). Application of artificial neural network and decision tree in a GIS–based predictive soil mapping for landslide vulnerability study: A case study of Hoi Num Rin sub–Watershed, Thailand (104pp). The Netherlands: ITC, Enschede.Google Scholar
  31. Nandi, A., & Shakoor, A. (2010). A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Engineering Geology, 110, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nefeslioglu, H., Sezer, E., Gokceoglu, C., Bozkir, A., & Duman, T. (2010). Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2010(901095), 15.Google Scholar
  33. Ohlmacher, G. C., & Davis, J. C. (2003). Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Engineering Geology, 69, 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohmann, J. L., & Gregory, M. J. (2002). Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest-neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 725–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ozdemir, A. (2011). Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the Sultan mountains (Aksehir, Turkey). Journal of Hydrology, 405, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Papadopoulou-Vrynioti, K., Bathrellos, G. D., Skilodimou, H. D., Kaviris, G., & Makropoulos, K. (2013). Karst collapse susceptibility mapping considering peak ground acceleration in a rapidly growing urban area. Engineering Geology, 158, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pradhan, B. (2013a). A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 51, 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pradhan, B. (2013b). A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 51, 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010a). Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, 1037–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010b). Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: Backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25, 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pradhan, B., Lee, S., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2010). A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34, 216–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahman, A.-U., Khan, A. N., & Collins, A. E. (2014). Analysis of landslide causes and associated damages in the Kashmir Himalayas of Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 71, 803–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Regmi, N. R., Giardino, J. R., McDonald, E. V., & Vitek, J. D. (2014). A comparison of logistic regression-based models of susceptibility to landslides in western Colorado, USA. Landslides, 11, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Regmi, N. R., Giardino, J. R., & Vitek, J. D. (2010). Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology, 115, 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Runyan, C. W., D’odorico, P. (2014). Bistable dynamics between forest removal and landslide occurrence. Water Resources Research, 50, 1112–1130.Google Scholar
  46. Saito, H., Nakayama, D., & Matsuyama, H. (2009). Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: The Akaishi Mountains, Japan. Geomorphology, 109, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shirzadi, A., Saro, L., Joo, O. H., & Chapi, K. (2012). A GIS-based logistic regression model in rock-fall susceptibility mapping along a mountainous road: Salavat Abad case study, Kurdistan, Iran. Natural Hazards, 64, 1639–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tehrany, M. S., Lee, M.-J, Pradhan, B., Jebur, M. N., & Lee, S. (2014a). Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environmental Earth Science, 72(10), 1–s15.Google Scholar
  49. Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2013). Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (DT) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 504, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2014b). Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tien Bui, D., Pradhan, B., Lofman, O., & Revhaug, I. (2012a). Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naive Bayes Models. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012.Google Scholar
  52. Tien Bui, D., Pradhan, B., Lofman, O., Revhaug, I., & Dick, O. B. (2012b). Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 45, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ueno, K., Kurobe, K., Imaizumi, F., & Nishii, R. (2015). Effects of deforestation and weather on diurnal frost heave processes on the steep mountain slopes in south central Japan. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40(15), 2013–2025.Google Scholar
  54. Van Beek, L., & Van Asch, T. W. (2004). Regional assessment of the effects of land-use change on landslide hazard by means of physically based modelling. Natural Hazards, 31, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vranken, L., Van Turnhout, P., Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Vandekerckhove, L., & Poesen, J. (2013). Economic valuation of landslide damage in hilly regions: A case study from Flanders, Belgium. Science of the Total Environment, 447, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wan, S., Lei, T.-C., & Chou, T.-Y. (2012). A landslide expert system: Image classification through integration of data mining approaches for multi-category analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26, 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu, C., Dai, F., Xu, X., & Lee, Y. H. (2012). GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China. Geomorphology, 145, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu, C., Xu, X., Dai, F., Wu, Z., He, H., Shi, F., et al. (2013). Application of an incomplete landslide inventory, logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping related to the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of China. Natural Hazards, 68, 883–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yalcin, A. (2008). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena, 72, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yalcin, A., Reis, S., Aydinoglu, A., & Yomralioglu, T. (2011). A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena, 85, 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yilmaz, I. (2009). A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 68, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhu, L., & Huang, J.-F. (2006). GIS-based logistic regression method for landslide susceptibility mapping in regional scale. J Zhejiang univ-Sc A, 7, 2007–2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations