Skip to main content

Outcasts, Fugitives, and Migrants: Mobility and the Social Production of Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hesitant Histories on the Romanian Screen
  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

Of the final three thematic chapters of the study focusing on the cinematic representations of transitional post-socialist Romanian society, this chapter focuses on the social production of space displayed through narratives about outcasts, fugitives, and migrants. Moving across physical space, their mobility becomes an important social signifier in the sense that, after the geographic and political isolation of the state socialist years, the opportunity and the freedom to move became a primary tool in the identity construction of the post-socialist citizen. In the films, disoriented characters hesitantly cross labyrinthine social settings, move in-between urban and rural spaces, and in the process redraw the patterns of performative spatial practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the concept of self-exotization, see (Kiossev 2011).

  2. 2.

    The politics behind the distribution of awards at international film festivals (Cannes, Venice, Berlin, etc.) is a topic which would deserve a detailed analysis (I discuss it briefly in Chapter 9). In this regard, the identities of various West European international film festivals (what types of films they select and award) could be defined as well. These identities are also recognized by the filmmakers themselves, who seem to choose to participate only at those festivals that recognize their work with small statues.

  3. 3.

    Elsewhere I have argued that contemporary Hungarian cinema depicts several young characters who leave the country in the hope of a better life, but who return after not being able to adjust (see Strausz 2014).

  4. 4.

    Filimon argues that Porumboiu also displays this reflexive-modernist attitude. While I agree with her interpretation of the two directors’ artistic strategies, my study proposes that the range of the hesitant epistemic program in New Romanian Cinema is in fact much broader.

  5. 5.

    See Fig. 5.2.

  6. 6.

    See Chapter 2 for a more detailed discussion about the transformations of Bucharest city spaces during the Ceaușescu era.

  7. 7.

    In the subsequent shot, Crișan pays tribute to the history of cinema when he arranges his characters exiting the market just like the workers leaving the Lumière factory in the famous 1895 film.

  8. 8.

    Parvulescu and Nitu describe Nelu’s actions through the concepts of “transnational solidarity” and “cosmopolitan solidarity.” See (Parvulescu and Nitu 2014).

References

  • Augé, Marc. 1995. Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 2006. The Writer of Modern Life. Essays on Charles Baudelaire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. “The Commitment to Theory.” The Location of Culture. 19–39. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel. 2000. “Walking in the City.” The Certeau Reader. edited by Graham Ward. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filimon, Monica. 2014. “Incommunicable Experiences: Ambiguity and Perceptual Realism in Cristi Puiu’s Aurora (2010).” Studies in Eastern European Cinema 5 (2): 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiossev, Alexander. 2011. “The Self-colonizing Metaphor.” Atlas of Transformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasta, Dominique. 2013. Contemporary Romanian Cinema. History of an Unexpected Miracle. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parvulescu, Constantin, and Ciprian Nitu 2014. “Challenging Communities of Values. The Peripheral Cosmopolitanism of Marian Crișan’s Morgen.” Iluminace 26 (2): 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusca, Anca. 2013. Revolution, Democratic Transition and Disillusionment. The Case of Romania. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiden. 2011. “Arhitecture & Putere.” Rezistenta Urbana. http://rezistenta.net/2011/02/arhitectura-si-putere.html (accessed November 24, 2016).

  • Strausz, László. 2014. “Back to the Past: Mnemonic Themes in Contemporary Hungarian Cinema.” East European Film Bulletin 2014 (March).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strausz, L. (2017). Outcasts, Fugitives, and Migrants: Mobility and the Social Production of Space. In: Hesitant Histories on the Romanian Screen. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55272-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics