Advertisement

An Alternative to the Dominant Academic Narrative

  • Geoffrey MossEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Sociology book series (BRIEFSSOCY)

Abstract

Lawrenceville’s artistic enclave is centered on the activities of struggling artistic gentrifiers within a post-industrial context. In this chapter, I begin by organizing existing scholarly research findings and theoretical assertions about such enclaves into four major themes. These themes constitute what I refer to as the dominant academic narrative about post-industrial artistic enclaves. This narrative maintains, in short, that in major urban centers, struggling artistic gentrifiers continue to express antagonism toward and opposition to a post-industrial bourgeoisie that welcomes and benefits from, but ultimately displaces their artistic enclaves. I then discuss Lawrenceville’s artistic creative class enclave, maintaining that the existence of such an enclave constitutes an alternative to the dominant academic narrative. Finally, I compare Lawrenceville’s artistic enclave to three related community types.

Keywords

Bohemia Neo-bohemia Mele Lloyd Artistic enclaves Artistic communities Zukin Loft living Post-industrial city Creative class 

References

  1. Brockbank, J. (2006). The ‘creative class’ and its impact on the gentrification of artistic ‘Neo-Bohemian Neighborhoods’: A case study of the Quesburn Valley artists’ quarter. Dissertation, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, U.K.: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  2. Cole, D. (1987). Artists and urban redevelopment. Geographical Review, 77(4), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Forkert, K. (2013). The persistence of bohemia. City, 17(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gale, D. (1984). Neighborhood revitalization and the postindustrial city. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Ley, D. (1996). The New middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ley, D. (2003). Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2527–2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lloyd, R. (2002). Neo–Bohemia: Art and neighborhood redevelopment in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lloyd, R. D. (2006). Neo-Bohemia: Art and commerce in the postindustrial city. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Martí-Costa, M., & Pradel i Miquel, M. (2012). The knowledge city against urban creativity? Artists’ workshops nd urban regeneration in barcelona. European urban and regional studies, 19(1), 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mele, C. (2000). Selling the lower east side: Culture, real estate, and resistance in New York city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Minton, A. (2003). Northern Soul—Culture, creativity and quality of place in Newcastle and Gateshead. London: RICS/DEMOS.Google Scholar
  14. Morgen, G., & Ren, X. (2012). Introduction: The creative underclass: Culture, subculture, and urban renewel. Journal of urban affairs, 34(2), 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Silver, D., Clark, T. N., & Graziul, C. (2011). Scenes, innovation, and urban development. In D. E. Andersson, A. E. Anderson, & C. Mellander (Eds.), Handbook of creative cities (pp. 229–258). Cheltigham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Solnit, R., & Schwartzenberg, S. (2002). Hollow city: The siege of san francisco and the crisis of american urbanism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. Vivant, E. (2010). The (Re)Making of Paris as a bohemian place? Progress in planning, 74(3), 107–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zukin, S. (1982). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change (Paperback ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Zukin, S., Trujillo, V., Frase, P., Jackson, D., Recuber, T., & Walker, A. (2009). New retail capital and neighborhood change: Boutiques and gentrification in New York city. City & community, 8, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford University Press: UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations