Advertisement

Issues of Instituting Administrative Action Against Legal Entities as Subjects of Entrepreneurial Activities

  • Ekaterina N. ChurakovaEmail author
  • Galina E. Ageeva
  • Andrey V. Loshkarev
  • Elmira K. Gubaydullina
  • Olga N. Kolesova
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

Study of the issues related to problems of instituting administrative action against legal entities hasn’t lost its topicality. Law enforcement activities of the subjects of administrative jurisdiction, including judges, each day face substantial gaps and collisions in the law that regulates the order of instituting action against a legal entity and applying administrative enforcement. The article views peculiarities of administrative responsibility of a legal entity. First of all, they are related to peculiarities of construction of a legal entity—as a subject of legal relations. Special attention is paid to the following: firstly, analysis of approaches to the notion of guilt of a legal entity, which formed in the science of administrative law and legal practice, as a basis of instituting action against it; secondly, the issue of parallel regulation of the order of instituting administrative action against a legal entity for homogeneous offences by various federal legal acts. The article offers measures for reformation of separate norms of law, aimed at regulation of the above problems.

Keywords

Administrative responsibility Guilt Offence Legal entity Legal responsibility 

References

  1. Code of the Russian Federation on administrative offences dated December 30, 2001, No. 195-FZ (edited July 6, 2016) (amendments dated September 1, 2016). SL of the RF dated January 7, 2002, No. 1 (p 1), Article 1Google Scholar
  2. Davant C (2002) Employer liability for employee fraud: apparent authority or respondent superior? South Dakota Law Rev 47(fall):554–582Google Scholar
  3. Federal Law dated July 10, 2002 No. 86-FZ (edited July 3, 2016) “On the central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)” (amendments dated July 15, 2016). SL of the RF dated July 15, 2002, No. 28, Article 2790Google Scholar
  4. Federal Law dated December 10, 2003 No. 173-FZ (ed. July 2, 2016) “On currency regulation and currency control”. SL of the RF dated December 15, 2003, No. 50, Article 4859Google Scholar
  5. Ferrara RC, Sanger D (1983) Derivative liability in securities law: controlling person liability, respondent superior, and aiding and abetting, 40 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1007 [E-source]. Accessed http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol40/iss3/4
  6. Kozlov KP (2009) RF AOC: “strict” responsibility of legal entities (comparative and legal study). Russian Justice, No. 2Google Scholar
  7. Krivova IS (1999) Subjective aspect of tax offence performed by a taxpayer—legal entity. Legal World 5:6Google Scholar
  8. Leist ОE (1962) Sanctions in Soviet law. Gosyurizdat, Мoscow, p 85Google Scholar
  9. Lipinsky DА (1999) Forms of realization of legal responsibility. PhD thesis, Samara, p 28Google Scholar
  10. Nazarov IV (2002) Administrative responsibility of organizations (legal entities). PhD thesis, Nizhny Novgorod, pp 24–25Google Scholar
  11. On certain issues with courts regarding application of the Code of the RF on Administrative Offences [Text]: Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF dated March 23, 2005, No. 5 (ed. December 19, 2013). Russian newspaper dated April 19, 2005, No. 80Google Scholar
  12. Rossinsky BV (2012) Directions and reasons for development of provisions of the RF AOC that establish administrative responsibility of legal entities. Actual problems of administrative responsibility: materials of all-Russian scientific and practical conference, Omsk, May 25, 2012. Omsk Academy of Law, Omsk, p 58Google Scholar
  13. Shatalov SD (1999) Commentary to the tax code of the Russian Federation, part one (articles): study guide. MCFED, Мoscow, p 551Google Scholar
  14. Tax Code of the Russian Federation (part 1), dated July 31, 1998, No. 146-FZ (edited July 3, 2016) (with amendments dated September 1, 2016). SL of the RF dated August 3, 1998, No. 31, Article 3824Google Scholar
  15. Vinnitsky D (2003) Problems of limitations of tax and administrative responsibility. Econ Law 5:111Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ekaterina N. Churakova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Galina E. Ageeva
    • 1
  • Andrey V. Loshkarev
    • 1
  • Elmira K. Gubaydullina
    • 1
  • Olga N. Kolesova
    • 1
  1. 1.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations