Using India Ink as a Sensor for Oximetry: Evidence of its Safety as a Medical Device
Clinical EPR spectroscopy is emerging as an important modality, with the potential to be used in standard clinical practice to determine the extent of hypoxia in tissues and whether hypoxic tissues respond to breathing enriched oxygen during therapy. Oximetry can provide important information useful for prognosis and to improve patient outcomes. EPR oximetry has many potential advantages over other ways to measure oxygen in tissues, including directly measuring oxygen in tissues and being particularly sensitive to low oxygen, repeatable, and non-invasive after an initial injection of the EPR-sensing material is placed in the tumor. The most immediately available oxygen sensor is India ink, where two classes of carbon (carbon black and charcoal) have been identified as having acceptable paramagnetic properties for oximetry. While India ink has a long history of safe use in tattoos, a systematic research search regarding its safety for marking tissues for medical uses and an examination of the evidence that differentiates between ink based on charcoal or carbon black has not been conducted. Methods. Using systematic literature search techniques, we searched the PubMed and Food and Drug Administration databases, finding ~1000 publications reporting on adverse events associated with India/carbon based inks. The detailed review of outcomes was based on studies involving >16 patients, where the ink was identifiable as carbon black or charcoal. Results. Fifty-six studies met these criteria. There were few reports of complications other than transient and usually mild discomfort and bleeding at injection, and there was no difference in charcoal vs. carbon black India ink. Conclusions. India ink was generally well tolerated by patients and physicians reported that it was easy to use in practice and used few resources. The risk is low enough to justify its use as an oxygen sensor in clinical practice.
KeywordsCarbon particles EPR sensot India ink Structured literature review Adverse Events
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute grant P01 CA190193).
ABF and HMS are owners of Clin-EPR, LLC, which manufacturers EPR devices for investigational clinical applications.
- 4.Jordan BF, Baudelet C, Gallez B (1998) Carbon-centered radicals as oxygen sensors for in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance: screening for an optimal probe among commercially available charcoals magnetic resonance materials in physics. Biol Med 7:121–129Google Scholar
- 13.Fujita H, Nishil Y, Yamashita K, Kawamata A, Yoshikawa K (1988) The uptake and long-term storage of India ink particles and latex beads by fibroblasts in the dermis and subcutis of mice, with special regard to the non-inflammatory defense reaction by fibroblasts. Arch Histol Cytol 51(3):285–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Food and Drug Administration (2012). Tattoos & permanent makeup: fact sheet http://www.fda.gov/ Cosmetics/ProductsIngredients/Products/ucm108530.htm . Accessed 20 Aug 2016