Predicted Decrease in Membrane Oxygen Permeability with Addition of Cholesterol

  • Gary Angles
  • Rachel Dotson
  • Kristina Bueche
  • Sally C. PiasEmail author
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 977)


Aberrations in cholesterol homeostasis are associated with several diseases that can be linked to changes in cellular oxygen usage. Prior biological and physical studies have suggested that membrane cholesterol content can modulate oxygen delivery, but questions of magnitude and biological significance remain open for further investigation. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations in a first step toward reexamining the rate impact of cholesterol on the permeation of oxygen through phospholipid bilayers. The simulation models are closely compared with published electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry measurements. The simulations predict an oxygen permeability reduction due to cholesterol but also suggest that the EPR experiments may have underestimated resistance to oxygen permeation in the phospholipid headgroup region.


Molecular dynamics simulation Oximetry Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) Resistance to permeation Tempocholine 



We thank Ross Walker and Benjamin Madej for providing advance access to the cholesterol parameters used in this study. James Ryan Bredin developed the O2 parameters used in this work. Daniel Lyons contributed valuable computing expertise. The molecular images were generated using PyMOL software [18], and DataThief software [19] was used to infer the experimental values reported in Fig. 2.1b from published plots. SCP thanks James Kindt and Snežna Rogelj for professional mentoring. This work was supported by the NIH under NIGMS grant P20GM103451 and by a gift from the Glendorn Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors. We used computing resources of TACC at UT Austin, accessed through XSEDE (funded by NSF grant ACI-1053575), as well as the EXXACT MD SimCluster (“Electra”) at New Mexico Tech.


  1. 1.
    Mouritsen OG, Zuckermann MJ (2004) What’s so special about cholesterol? Lipids 39(11):1101–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larsson M, Larsson K, Nylander T, Wollmer P (2003) The bilayer melting transition in lung surfactant bilayers: the role of cholesterol. Eur Biophys J 31(8):633–636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jandl J, Blood H (1996) Textbook of hematology, 2nd edn. Little, Brown and Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawasaki K, Yin JJ, Subczynski WK et al (2001) Pulse EPR detection of lipid exchange between protein-rich raft and bulk domains in the membrane: methodology development and its application to studies of influenza viral membrane. Biophys J 80(2):738–748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raguz M, Mainali L, Widomska J, Subczynski WK (2011) Using spin-label electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to discriminate and characterize the cholesterol bilayer domain. Chem Phys Lipids 164(8):819–829CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wennberg CL, van der Spoel D, Hub JS (2012) Large influence of cholesterol on solute partitioning into lipid membranes. J Am Chem Soc 134(11):5351–5361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan N, Shen J, Chang TY et al (2003) Plasma membrane cholesterol: a possible barrier to intracellular oxygen in normal and mutant CHO cells defective in cholesterol metabolism. Biochemistry 42(1):23–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menchaca HJ, Michalek VN, Rohde TD et al (1998) Decreased blood oxygen diffusion in hypercholesterolemia. Surgery 124(4):692–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Widomska J, Raguz M, Subczynski WK (2007) Oxygen permeability of the lipid bilayer membrane made of calf lens lipids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768(10):2635–2645CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Case DA, Berryman JT, Betz RM, et al (2015) AMBER 2015. University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salomon-Ferrer R, Götz AW, Poole D et al (2013) Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J Chem Theory Comput 9(9):3878–3888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickson CJ, Madej BD, Skjevik ÅA et al (2014) Lipid14: the Amber lipid force field. J Chem Theory Comput 10(2):865–879CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madej BD, Gould IR, Walker RC (2015) A parameterization of cholesterol for mixed lipid bilayer simulation within the Amber Lipid14 force field. J Phys Chem B 119(38):12424–12435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jorgensen WL, Jenson C (1998) Temperature dependence of TIP3P, SPC, and TIP4P water from NPT Monte Carlo simulations: seeking temperatures of maximum density. J Comput Chem 19(10):1179–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Skjevik AA, Madej BD, Walker RC, Teigen K (2012) LIPID11: a modular framework for lipid simulations using Amber. J Phys Chem B 116(36):11124–11136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marrink S-J, Berendsen HJC (1994) Simulation of water transport through a lipid membrane. J Phys Chem 98(15):4155–4168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shea R, Smith C, Pias SC (2016) Magnification of cholesterol-induced membrane resistance on the tissue level: implications for hypoxia. Adv Exp Med Biol 923:43–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schrödinger LLC (2015) The PyMOL molecular graphics system, Version Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tummers B (2006) DataThief IIIGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Angles
    • 1
  • Rachel Dotson
    • 1
  • Kristina Bueche
    • 1
  • Sally C. Pias
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryNew Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (New Mexico Tech)SocorroUSA

Personalised recommendations