Skip to main content

Corporate Governance Best Practice: Tasks and Shortcomings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Corporate Governance

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1613 Accesses

Abstract

The shortcomings and inefficiencies of corporate governance are intended to be mitigated by the implementation of codes of best practice. While internationally the codes cover similar set of recommendations on board work, transparency, investor protection and empowerment as well as cooperation with various stakeholders, the adoption and factual compliance with these guidelines remains an issue. The instrumental treatment of the recommendations and the superficial explanations for non-compliance limit the impact of this form of self-regulation.

This chapter addresses the shortcomings of corporate governance best practice. It aims at presenting motivations for adopting corporate governance guidelines as revealed by listed companies in the annual declaration of conformity included in the company report. It also shows limitations for implementation of guidelines in practice and their importance for the investment decision by investors. The arguments for best practice code and the statements of compliance with respect to the quality of corporate governance are confronted with the insights and observations collected during 20 interviews with board directors, corporate governance experts, auditors, lawyers and funds representatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R., & Cuervo-Cazura, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25, 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluchna, M. (2009). Implementation of best practice code. Practical implications from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Social Responsibility Journal, 5, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aluchna, M. (2015). Własność a corporate governance [Ownership and corporate governance]. Warszawa: Potlext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcot, S., Bruno, V., & Faure-Grimaud, A. (2010). Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working. International Review of Law and Economics, 30, 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H., & Anderson, R. (2011). An overview of corporate governance. In H. Baker & R. Anderson (Eds.), Corporate governance. A synthesis of theory, research and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Gunster, N., & Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. Journal of Asset Management, 5, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglöf, E., & Claessens, S. (2006). Enforcement and good corporate governance in developing countries and transition economies. World Bank Research Observer, 21, 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bistrowa, J., & Lace, N. (2012). Corporate governance best practice and stock performance: case of CEE companies. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 10, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury Report. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. Accessed 12 January, 2016, from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf

  • Campbell, K., Jerzemowska, M., & Najman, K. (2006). Wstępna analiza przestrzegania zasad nadzoru korporacyjnego przez spółki notowane na GPW w Warszawie w 2005 roku [The Initial Analysis of Compliance with Corporate Governance Guidelines by the companies listed on Warsaw Stock Exchange in 2005]. In: Rudolf, S. ed. Tendencje zmian w nadzorze korporacyjnym [Latest Tendencies in Corporate Governance], Lódż.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., Jerzemowska, M., & Najman, K. (2009). Corporate governance challenges in Poland: Evidence from “comply or explain” disclosures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9, 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chizema, A. (2008). Institutions and voluntary compliance: The disclosure of individual executive pay in Germany. Corporate Governance, 16, 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T., & Chanlat, J. (2009). Introduction: A new order? The recurring crisis in Anglo-American corporate governance and the increasing impact on European economies and institutions. In T. Clarke & J. F. Chanlat (Eds.), European corporate governance. Readings and perspectives (pp. 1–42). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, A. (2002). Corporate governance mechanisms: A plea for less code of good governance and more market control. Corporate Governance, 10, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2008). The impracticality of an international ‘one size fits all’ corporate governance code of best practice. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23, 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karoly, A., & Stulz, R. (2007). Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 86, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & Choo, J. (2005). Law and corporate governance, law and corporate governance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncharov, I., Werner, J., & Zimmermann, J. (2006). Does compliance with the German corporate governance code have an impact on stock valuation? An empirical analysis. Corporate Governance, 14, 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, N., Postma, T., & Zivkov, O. (2007). Corporate governance codes and their contents: An analysis of Eastern European codes. Journal for East European Management Studies, 12, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, M. (2009). Corporate governance and the financial crisis: Questions and answers, OECD. Accessed 16 October, 2010, from http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3343,en_2649_34813_43063537_1_1_1_1,00.html

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis, OCED. Accessed 16 October, 2010, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/1/42229620.pdf

  • Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters. A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, F. (2007). Summary of major corporate governance principles and best practices. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 4, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, I., & Li, X. (2006). “Comply or explain”: Market discipline and non-compliance with the combine code. Corporate Governance, 14, 486–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. (2004). Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R., & Minow, N. (2004). Corporate governance. Oxford: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). Principles of corporate governance. Accessed 9 January, 2016, from http://Www.Oecd.Org/Corporate/Ca/Corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.Pdf

  • OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of vorporate governance. Accessed 9 January, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf

  • Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., & Sercu, P. (2010). Corporate-governance ratings and company performance: A cross-European study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M. (2003). Political determinant of corporate governance. Political context, corporate impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2003). Culture, openness and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70, 313–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, B. (2012). Corporate governance. Principles, policies and practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. (2008). Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspective. Corporate Governance, 16, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Aluchna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aluchna, M. (2017). Corporate Governance Best Practice: Tasks and Shortcomings. In: Aluchna, M., Idowu, S. (eds) Responsible Corporate Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55206-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics