Skip to main content

Company Social Investments: Growth of Capitalization and Risks (The Case of Russia)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Corporate Governance

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1568 Accesses

Abstract

The paper presents the results of the empirical study of 15 largest Russian public companies in different sectors of economy with the most developed models of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The aim of the study is to explore how social investments affect Russian firms’ market value and to compare the types of risks that the sample companies considered as important areas of investments in CSR. The findings showed a positive correlation between company investments in creating better working conditions, occupational health and safety, environment-related activities and company capitalization. In the majority of cases, these two factors make a major impact on minimizing company risks. At the same time it was found out that company reputational risks are undervalued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 932–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluchna, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility of the Top 10: Examples taken from the Warsaw stock exchange. Social Responsibility Journal, 6, 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balancing Rules and Flexibility. A Study of Corporate Governance Requirements Across 25 Markets. (2014). KPMG International Cooperative and ACCA. Accessed February 15, 2016, from http://www.kpmg.com/SG/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Advisory-RC-Balancing-Rules-and-Flexibility2.pdf

  • Belyaeva, Z. (2013). Transformation processes of the corporate development in Russia: Social responsibility issues. Systems Practice and Action Research, 26, 485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagov Yu. (2011). Корпоративная социальная ответственность: эволюция концепции [Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of the concept]. St Petersburg: Higher School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Corporate Governance. (2014). Accessed February 15, 2016, from http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/legal/corporate/russia_code.pdf

  • DJSI Annual Review. (2015). Results. Accessed February 12, 2016, from http://www.sustainability-indices.com/review/annual-review-2015.jsp

  • Expectations of Risk Management Outpacing Capabilities. (2013). It’s time for action. Top eight risk management imperatives for the C-suite in 2013. KPMG International. Accessed February 10, 2016, from https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/risk-management-outpacing-capabilities/Documents/expectations-risk-management-survey.pdf

  • Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Velamuri, S. (2008, July 30). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glebova, L., Rodnyansky, D., Sadyrtdinov, R., Khabibrakhmanova, R., & Yasnitskaya, Y. (2013). Evaluation of corporate social responsibility of Russian companies based on nonfinancial reporting. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research (Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities), 13, 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hau, H., & Thum, M.P. (2010). Subprime crisis and the board (In-) competence: Private vs. public banks in Germany (CESifo Working Paper, 2640).

    Google Scholar 

  • IQNet SR 10. (2011). Social responsibility management systems. Requiremens. IQNet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov, A., & Kuznetsova, O. (2008). Gaining competitiveness through trust: The experience of Russia. European Journal of International Management, 2(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, M., & Salzmann, A. (2015, April 29). Corporate social responsibility and firms’ cost of capital: Does culture matter?

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongiardino, A., & Plath, С. (2010). Risk governance at large banks: Have any lessons been learned? Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 3, 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Report on Corporate Governance. (2013). Issue VI (pp. 31–71, 217–231). Accessed February 13, 2016, from www.nccg.ru

  • Ramenskaya, L. (2015). Исследование взаимозависимости доходности и риска в российских компаниях (на примере компаний металлургической промышленности) [The Study of Relationship between ROE and Risk (The Case of Russian Metallurgical Companies)]. Economica and Predprinimatelstvo, 12(1), 702–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2013). The global competitiveness report 2013–2014. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Accessed February 10, 2016, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013–14.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2014). The global competitiveness report 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Accessed February 10, 2016, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkachenko, I. (2011). Новые тенденции в развитии российской модели корпоративного управления: посткризисные уроки и выводы [New Trends in the Development of the Russian Model of Corporate Governance: The Post-Crisis Lessons and Conclusions]. Ekaterinburg: USUE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkachenko, I. (2015). Key features of the Russian model of corporate governance. In M. Aluchna & G. Aras (Eds.), Transforming governance: New values, new systems in new business environment (pp. 195–218). Gower: Farnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbitsky V. (2015). Из идеального реальному: что действительно нужно компаниям для применения на практике из corporate governance best practices [From Ideal to Real: What Corporate Governance Best Practices Firms Should Use]. Мoscow: Alpina Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Tkachenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tkachenko, I., Ramenskaya, L. (2017). Company Social Investments: Growth of Capitalization and Risks (The Case of Russia). In: Aluchna, M., Idowu, S. (eds) Responsible Corporate Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55206-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics