Skip to main content

The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF): A United Army for a Divided Country?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Civil-Military Relations in Lebanon

Abstract

Multi-confessional armies are often seen as being weak and prone to disintegration. The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) is a case in point. From its inception it was formed as a multi-confessional force meant to serve as a neutral political arbiter, but it experienced civil war fragmentation and dissolution (1975–1990). Post-war restructuring and reform rebuilt the force, but the threat of disintegration along confessional lines has remained. However, the LAF is consistently ranked as the country’s most trusted public institution, its last resort amidst repeated government collapse and state failure. The LAF strives to embody a national ideal: a united force, raised above sectarianism. Even so, the Syrian civil war has strained the LAF’s cohesion and threatens its neutrality – its most valued assets in a deeply divided society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By ‘politicization’, we mean ‘actions and processes intended to inject personal or partisan political loyalty into the defence structure’ (McLaurin, 1991, pp. 564ff). Often visible in senior appointments and promotions, both partisanship and favouritism weaken military cohesion (Moussa, 2016).

  2. 2.

    According to the Taef Agreement, article II-B, the President ‘is the supreme commander of the armed forces which are subject to the power of the cabinet’. According to Article II-D 3, ‘the cabinet is the authority which controls the armed forces.’

  3. 3.

    Rifi, interview (by T.G), Beirut, February 2015.

  4. 4.

    Future Movement leaders, interview (by T.G.), Beirut, March 2016.

References

  • Aboultaif, Eduardo W. 2016. ‘The Lebanese army: Saviour of the republic?’ The RUSI Journal 161(1): 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, Oren. 2006. ‘Towards a representative military? The transformation of the Lebanese Officer Corps since 1945’. The Middle East Journal 60: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, Oren. 2009. The Lebanese army. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollens, Scott. 2012. City and soul in divided societies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • el Khazen, F. 2003. ‘Political parties in postwar Lebanon: Parties in search of partisans’. Middle East Journal 57(4): 605–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gade, Tine. 2007. Fatah al-Islam in Lebanon: Between local and global Jihad. Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaub, Florence. 2007. ‘Multi-ethnic armies in the aftermath of civil war: Lessons learned from Lebanon’. Defence Studies 7(1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaub, Florence. 2011. Military integration after civil wars: Multiethnic armies, identity and post-conflict reconstruction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaub, Florence. 2016. Guardians of the Arab State: When militaries intervene in politics, from Iraq to Mauritania. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamzeh, A. Nizar. 2001. ‘Clientelism, Lebanon: Roots and trends’. Middle Eastern Studies 37(3): 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harik, Judith Palmer. 2005. Hizbollah: The changing face of terrorism. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamé, Kari. 2009. ‘Reintegration and the relevance of social relations: The case of Lebanon’. Conflict, Security and Development 9(4): 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, Are J. 2011. ‘Nahr el-Bared: The political fall-out of a refugee disaster’. In Palestinian refugees: Identity, space and place in the Levant, edited by Are Knudsen and Sari Hanafi, 97–110. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, Are J. 2012. ‘Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Homage to Hariri?’. In Lebanon: After the Cedar Revolution, edited by Are Knudsen and Michel Kerr, 219–233. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, Are, and Michael Kerr, eds. 2012. Lebanon: After the Cedar revolution. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, Are J. 2014. ‘Lebanese Armed Forces: A United Army for a Divided Country?’. CMI insight 9, http://www.cmi.no/publications/publication/?5284=lebanese-armed-forces. Accessed 25 September 2016.

  • Lupo, Nicolas. 2013. ‘Factional politics limit the effectiveness of Lebanon Army’, Al Monitor. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/09/lebanese-armed-forces-limited-effect-factional-politics.html#. Accessed 11 September 2016.

  • Makdisi, Samir, and Richard Sadaka. 2003. ‘The Lebanese Civil War, 1975–1990. Beirut: American University of Beirut (AUB), Lecture and Working Paper Series, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaurin, Ronald. 1991. ‘From professional to political: The redecline of the Lebanese Army’. Armed Forces and Society 17(4): 545–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moussa, Nayla. 2014. Armée, communautés et Etat au Liban (1990–2012), PhD thesis, Paris: IEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussa, Nayla. 2016. Loyalties and group formation in the Lebanese Officer Corps. Carnegie Regional Insight, 3 February 2016. Washington, DC: Carnegie Foundation for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdon, Simon. 2000. ‘Understanding Israel’s long conflict in Lebanon: The search for an alternative approach to security during the peace process’. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 27(1): 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerguizian, Aram. 2009. The Lebanese armed forces: Challenges and opportunities in Post-Syria Lebanon. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/090210_lafsecurity.pdf. Accessed 25 September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Elizabeth. 1994. ‘Les habis neufs du communautarisme libanais’. Culture et conflits 15–16(Autumn/Winter): 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Elizabeth. 1999. The demobilisation of the Lebanese militias. Oxford: Centre for Lebanese Studies, Prospects for Lebanon Series, No. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Elizabeth. 2002. Lebanon – A shattered country: Myths and realities about the wars in Lebanon, rev. edn, New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Elizabeth. 2009. ‘The virtual sovereignty of the Lebanese state: From deviant case to ideal-type’. In The Arab State and neo-liberal globalization: The restructuring of state power in the Middle East, edited by Laura Guazzone and Daniela Pioppi, 247–274. Reading, UK: Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Elizabeth. 2012. ‘Lebanon in search of sovereignty: post-2005 security dilemmas’. In Lebanon: After the Cedar revolution, edited by Are Knudsen and Michel Kerr, 83–104. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, Bernard. 2015. The Sunni tragedy in the Middle East: Northern Lebanon from al-Qaeda to ISIS. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg, Peter. 2009. ‘The EU as a realist actor in normative clothes: EU democracy promotion in Lebanon and the European Neighbourhood Policy’. Democratization 16(1): 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIPRI. 2016. https://knoema.com/SIPRI2013/sipri-military-expenditure-database-1988-2012?country=1001820-lebanon. Accessed 10 September 2016.

  • Volk, Lucia. 2009. ‘Martyrs at the margins: The politics of neglect in Lebanon’s borderlands’. Middle Eastern Studies 45(2): 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, Marie-Joélle. 2012. ‘Foreign interventions, power sharing and the dynamics of conflict and coexistence in Lebanon’. In Lebanon: After the Cedar revolution, edited by Are Knudsen and Michael Kerr, 63–82. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Are John Knudsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knudsen, A.J., Gade, T. (2017). The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF): A United Army for a Divided Country?. In: Knudsen, A., Gade, T. (eds) Civil-Military Relations in Lebanon. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55167-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics