Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual Difference Variables as Mediating Influences on Success or Failure in Form-Focused Instruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover At the Crossroads: Challenges of Foreign Language Learning

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Even though there is a growing body of research on the effectiveness of form-focused instruction (FFI), defined as both the introduction of target language (TL) features, be they grammatical, lexical, phonological or pragmatic in nature, the practice of these forms or the provision of corrective feedback on errors in their use (cf. Nassaji & Fotos, 2011; Spada, 2011; Loewen, 2012; Pawlak, 2014), studies of this kind have in the main focused on determining the effects of different instructional techniques, paying only scant attention to the impact of mediating variables. One key set of such variables are individual differences (IDs) among learners, both cognitive (e.g., aptitude), affective (e.g., motivation) and social (e.g., beliefs), the impact of which can hardly be underestimated as in some situations individual learner profiles may in fact determine the success or failure of the techniques and procedures employed by teachers. Given the fact that research exploring the effects of such factors is still in its infancy, it is important to take stock of what has been achieved in this domain and consider future directions of empirical investigations of this kind. This is precisely the aim of the paper which provides an overview of the available research on the interfaces between IDs and FFI, particularly with respect to grammar, offers a critical look at their scope and methodology, and seeks to identify the challenges that research on FFI has to face in this respect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Obviously, this is just one possible way in which different options in FFI can be categorized. Other divisions can be found, for example, in Ellis (1998, 2005), Loewen (2015) or Nassaji and Fotos (2011).

References

  • Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). The interface between research into individual learner variables and teaching practice; The case of cognitive factors and personality. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broszkiewicz, A. (2011). The effect of focused communication tasks on instructed acquisition of English past counterfactual conditionals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 335–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical basis of communicative approaches to second language testing and teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabaghi, A. (2008). A comparison of the effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on learners’ performance in tailor-made tests. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (Supplement 1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill Acquisition Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egi, T. (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2005b). Instructed language learning and task-based teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 713–728). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2006a). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2006b). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2008a). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2008b). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. M. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 33–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 87, 242–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2014). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Thomson & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Teaching and testing grammar. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 519–542). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. (2014). The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of linguistic target. Language Teaching Research, 18, 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 122–139). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S. (2014). The role of feedback. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24–40). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, S. L. (2011). English as an international lingua franca pedagogy. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 576–592). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2012). Production-oriented and comprehension-based grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nassaji, H. (2015). Interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, K. B. (2014). Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity? Language Teaching Research, 18, 272–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niżegorodcew, A. (2007). Input for instructed L2 learners: The relevance of relevance. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noels, K., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations of self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2004). Describing and researching interactive processes in the foreign language classroom. Konin: State University of Applied Sciences in Konin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2006). The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Poznań/Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2007). Comparing the effect of focus on form and focus on forms in teaching English third conditional. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Exploring focus on form in language teaching. Special issue of Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts (pp. 169–192). Kalisz/Poznań: Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts in Kalisz of Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2009a). Factors determining success and failure in the learning of English grammar. In A. Barker, D. Callahan, & A. Ferreira (Eds.), Success and failure. Essays from the 29th APEAA conference at the University of Aveiro, 17–19th April 2008 (pp. 327–338). Aveiro: University of Aveiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2009b). Grammar learning strategies and language attainment: Seeking a relationship. Research in Language, 7, 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2011). Cultural differences in perceptions of form/focused instruction: The case of advanced Polish and Italian learners. In A. Wojtaszek & J. Arabski (Eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 77–94). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2012a). Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Achievements, prospects and challenges. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. xix–xlvi). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2012b). Variability in the use of implicit knowledge: The effect of task, level and linguistic form. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel & L. Piasecka (Eds.), Variability and stability in foreign and second language learning contexts (pp. 279–298). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2012c). The effects of focus on forms and focus on form in teaching complex grammatical structures. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38, 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2013a). Principles of instructed language learning revisited: Guidelines for effective grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. In K. Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching. Studies in honor of Waldemar Marton (pp. 199–220). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2013b). Comparing learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about form-focused instruction. In D. Gabryś-Barker, E. Piechurska-Kuciel, & J. Zybert (Eds.), Investigations in teaching and learning languages: Studies in honor of Hanna Komorowska (pp. 109–131). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2015). Willingness to communicate as a factor influencing the effectiveness of input-providing and output-prompting oral corrective feedback. Paper read at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Toronto, March 21–24, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (in press). Teaching stylistic inversion to advanced learners of English: Interaction of input manipulation and individual difference variables. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2015). Exploring advanced learners’ beliefs about pronunciation instruction and their relationship with attainment. In E. Waniek-Klimczak & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Teaching and researching the pronunciation of English: Studies in honor of Włodzimierz Sobkowiak (pp. 3–22). Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1986). An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 92–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassaei, E. (2015). Recasts, field dependence-independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 19, 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data affecting and effecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between the characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 11, 361–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shintani, N. (2015). The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for Young Beginner Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63, 296–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanou, C., & Révész, A. (2015). Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. Modern Language Journal, 99, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics. Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E., & Bigelow, M. (2005). Impact of literacy on oral language processing: Implications for SLA research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2016). Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomita, Y., & Spada, N. (2013). Form-focused instruction and learner investment in L2 communication. Modern Language Journal, 97, 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trendak, O. (2015). Exploring the role of strategic intervention in form-focused instruction. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction? Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, R. (2010). How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? Modern Language Journal, 94, 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State University of Applied Sciences, Konin, Poland

    Mirosław Pawlak

  2. Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz, Poland

    Mirosław Pawlak

Authors
  1. Mirosław Pawlak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirosław Pawlak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of English, Opole University, Opole, Poland

    Ewa Piechurska-Kuciel

  2. Institute of English, Opole University, Opole, Poland

    Elżbieta Szymańska-Czaplak

  3. Institute of English, Opole University, Opole, Poland

    Magdalena Szyszka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pawlak, M. (2017). Individual Difference Variables as Mediating Influences on Success or Failure in Form-Focused Instruction. In: Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Szymańska-Czaplak, E., Szyszka, M. (eds) At the Crossroads: Challenges of Foreign Language Learning. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55155-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55154-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55155-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation