Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10171))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores the use of argumentation-based recommendation techniques as persuasive technologies. Concretely, in this work we evaluate how arguments can be used as explanations to influence the behaviour of users towards the use of certain items. The proposed system has been implemented as an educational recommender system for the Federation of Learning Objects Repositories of Colombia that recommends learning objects for students taking into account students profile, preferences, and learning needs. Moreover, the persuasion capacity of the proposed system has been tested over a set of real students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1484.12.1-2002 - IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata: https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1484.12.1-2002.html.

  2. 2.

    The complete rule set is not provided due to space restrictions.

References

  1. Benbasat, I., Wang, W.: Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 6(3), 4 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briguez, C., Budán, M., Deagustini, C., Maguitman, A., Capobianco, M., Simari, G.: Towards an argument-based music recommender system. COMMA 245, 83–90 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Briguez, C., Budán, M., Deagustini, C., Maguitman, A., Capobianco, M., Simari, G.: Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(14), 6467–6482 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Briguez, C., Capobianco, M., Maguitman, A.: A theoretical framework for trust-based news recommender systems and its implementation using defeasible argumentation. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 22(04), 1350021 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A., González, M.: Empowering recommendation technologies through argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 403–422. Springer, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Santos, O.C., Manouselis, N.: Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 421–451 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dwivedi, P., Bharadwaj, K.: e-Learning recommender system for a group of learners based on the unified learner profile approach. Expert Syst. 32(2), 264–276 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fogg, B.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002(December), 5 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Programm. 4(1+2), 95–138 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heras, S., Rebollo, M., Julián, V.: A dialogue game protocol for recommendation in social networks. In: Corchado, E., Abraham, A., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) HAIS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5271, pp. 515–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87656-4_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirschner, P., Buckingham-Shum, S., Carr, C.: Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Ivanović, M., Nanopoulos, A.: Recommender systems in e-learning environments: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 44(4), 571–604 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7132, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Recio-García, J., Quijano, L., Díaz-Agudo, B.: Including social factors in an argumentative model for group decision support systems. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 48–55 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodríguez, P., Heras, S., Palanca, J., Duque, N., Julián, V.: Argumentation-based hybrid recommender system for recommending learning objects. In: Rovatsos, M., Vouros, G., Julian, V. (eds.) EUMAS/AT -2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9571, pp. 234–248. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33509-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Salehi, M., Pourzaferani, M., Razavi, S.: Hybrid attribute-based recommender system for learning material using genetic algorithm and a multidimensional information model. Egypt. Inf. J. 14(1), 67–78 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sikka, R., Dhankhar, A., Rana, C.: A survey paper on e-learning recommender systems. Intl. J. Comput. Appl. 47(9), 27–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha, R., Swearingen, K.: The role of transparency in recommender systems. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 830–831. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Explaining recommendations: design and evaluation. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 353–382. Springer, US (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yoo, K.H., Gretzel, U., Zanker, M.: Source factors in recommender system credibility evaluation. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 689–714. Springer, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zapata, A., Menendez, V., Prieto, M., Romero, C.: A hybrid recommender method for learning objects. In: IJCA Proceedings on Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education (DEDCE), vol. 1, pp. 1–7 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the ‘Programa Nacional de Formación de Investigadores COLCIENCIAS’, and by the COLCIENCIAS project 1119-569-34172 from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. It was also supported by the projects TIN2015-65515-C4-1-R and TIN2014-55206-R of the Spanish government, and by the grant program for the recruitment of doctors for the Spanish system of science and technology (PAID-10-14) of the Universitat Politècnica de València.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stella Heras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heras, S., Rodríguez, P., Palanca, J., Duque, N., Julián, V. (2017). Using Argumentation to Persuade Students in an Educational Recommender System. In: de Vries, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors. PERSUASIVE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55133-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55134-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics