Skip to main content

Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Biobanking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

An increasing number of biospecimens are being collected in the context of multicenter and international clinical studies and diagnostics. This has revealed the need to optimize management of these biospecimens such that research biorepositories can guarantee that samples distributed to industry or academic researchers are comparable and without institute-dependent intrinsic bias. Acceptance of biological samples and associated data between countries will be facilitated if biobanks can propose validation protocols for their samples and ensure the accuracy of the results obtained from the samples. Certification or accreditation to international standards of the International Standards Organization (ISO) by an independent auditing body provides proof of effective organization, operational consistency and management of the production of “annotated specimens”. Subcontracting to testing laboratories, which are themselves accredited to international standards such as ISO 17025 (General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories) or ISO 15189 (Medical Laboratories—Particular Requirements for Quality and Competence), is proof of reliable sample characterization and production of “qualified specimens”. Despite the fundamental importance of these standards, compliance remains essentially voluntary to each individual biobank. Development of a system of international technical standards for research biobanks is a critical step, currently being addressed in ISO Technical Committee 276 “Biotechnology”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Riegman PHJ, Morente MM, Betsou F et al (2008) Biobanking for better healthcare. Mol Oncol 2:213–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spruessel A, Steimann G, Jung M et al (2004) Tissue ischemia time affects gene and protein expression patterns within minutes following surgical tumor excision. BioTechniques 36:1030–1037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) (2001) OECD biological resources centers. Underpining the future of life sciences and biotechnology. Paris, France. https://www.oecd.org/sti/biotech/2487422.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  4. Council of Europe Recommendation Rec (2006) 4 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on research on biological materials of human origin. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/texts_and_documents/Rec_2006_4.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  5. Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) (2007) OECD best practice guidelines for biological resource centres. http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/38777417.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  6. Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health (2011) NCI Best Pratices for Biospecimen Research. http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/bestpractices/2011-NCIBestPractices.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  7. No authors listed (2012) 2012 ISBER best practices for repositories collection, storage, retrieval, and distribution of biological materials for research international society for biological and environmental repositories. Biopreserv Biobank 10:79–161

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Organization for Standardization (2008) ISO 9001:2008-Quality Management Systems-Requirements

    Google Scholar 

  9. Director General of the AFNOR (2011) French Standard NF S 96–900 Quality of Collections of Biological Resources. http://www.p3gobservatory.org/download/projet+norme+Biobanque+Eng.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  10. National Cancer Research institute (2014) Biobank Quality Standard—Collecting, storing and providing human biological material and data for research Version 1. http://ccb.ncri.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Biobank-quality-standard-Version-1.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  11. College of American Pathologists (CAP) (2013) Standards for biorepository accreditation. www.cap.org/apps/docs/laboratory_accreditation/build/pdf/bap_standards.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2016

  12. International Organization for Standardization (2005) ISO/IEC 17025:2005—General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  13. http://www.bbmri-eric.it/binary/eric/cont/Compilation_Biobanque_de_Picardie_avril_2008.pdf

  14. Betsou F, Luzergues A, Carter A et al (2007) Towards norms for accreditation of biobanks for human health and medical research: compilation of existing guidelines into an ISO certification/accreditation norm-compatible format. Qual Assur J 11:221–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Betsou F, Barnes R, Burke T et al (2009) Human biospecimen research: experimental protocol and quality control tools. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18:1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lengellé J, Panopoulos E, Betsou F (2008) Soluble CD40-ligand as a biomarker for storage-related preanalytic variations of human serum. Cytokine 44:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Betsou F, Roussel B, Guillaume N et al (2009) Long-term stability of coagulation variables: protein S as a biomarker for preanalytical storage-related variations in human plasma. Thromb Haemost 101:1172–1175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Betsou F, Gunter E, Clements J et al (2013) Identification of evidence-based biospecimen quality control tools. J Mol Diagn 15:3–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaumont K, Betsou F (2010) An immunological fingerprinting method for differentiation of serum samples in research-oriented biobanks. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17:735–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. van Beers EH, Joosse SA, Ligtenberg MJ et al (2006) A multiplex PCR predictor for aCGH success of FFPE samples. Br J Cancer 94:333–337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nolan T, Hands RE, Ogunkolade W et al (2006) SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem 351:308–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories webpage (ISBER). http://www.isber.org/?page=SAT. Accessed 04 July 2016

  23. Ransohoff DF, Gourlay ML (2010) Sources of bias in specimens for research about molecular markers for cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:698–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore HM, Compton CC, Lim MD et al (2009) Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science. Cancer Res 69:6770–6772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Betsou F (2015) Biospecimen processing method validation. Biopreserv Biobank 13:69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Betsou F, ISBER Biospecimen Science Working Group (2016) Assays for qualification and quality stratification of clinical biospecimens used in research: a technical report from the ISBER biospecimen science working group. Biopreserv Biobank 14(5):398–409. doi:10.1089/bio.2016.0018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Standard Preanalytical Code (SPREC) V2.0. www.isber.org/?page=SPREC. Accessed 04 July 2016

  28. Lehmann S, Guadagni F, Moore H et al (2012) Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: review and implementation of the sample PREanalytical code (SPREC). Biopreserv Biobank 10:366–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moore HM, Kelly AB, Jewell SD et al (2011) Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). Cancer Cytopathol 119:92–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Betsou F, Lehmann S, Ashton G et al (2010) Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: defining the sample PREanalytical code. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:1004–1011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Proficiency Testing General Information. www.isber.org/default.asp?page=PTGI. Accessed 04 July 2016

  32. Gaignaux A, Ashton G, Coppola D et al (2016) A biospecimen proficiency testing program for biobank accreditation: four years of experience. Biopreserv Biobank 14(5):429–439. doi:10.1089/bio.2015.0108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. International Organization for Standardization (2016) ISO 17034:2009 General requirements for the competence of reference material producers

    Google Scholar 

  34. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation. Adopted resolutions of the eighth ILAC general assembly, Cape Town, South Africa, 10&12 October 2004. http://ilac.org/publications-and-resources/ga-resolutions/. Accessed 04 July 2016

  35. Carter A, Betsou F (2011) Quality assurance in cancer biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 9:157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fay Betsou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Betsou, F. (2017). Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Biobanking. In: Hainaut, P., Vaught, J., Zatloukal, K., Pasterk, M. (eds) Biobanking of Human Biospecimens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55120-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics