Abstract
We know little about how race, gender, migration and class intersect to shape paid elder care within immigrant and racialized communities. This chapter examines publicly subsidized, home-based elder care in Oakland, California’s Chinatown. Analysis of interviews with Chinese immigrant women who help family and non-family elderly show how this work combines coercive relations of paid employment and gendered duty with nurturing relations of empathy. Nurturing relations, coupled with labor, elderly and disability movement organizing, allowed unionization and the potential to challenge multiple inequalities. Women not only spoke of the power of the union to give them voices as immigrant women through mass collective action and to improve wages and benefits, but also noted the union’s inability to intervene with difficult recipient-employers. As a result, this work reflects persistent forms of social and economic subordination of immigrant women workers and enduring relations of gendered duty, alongside nurturing relations.
We are grateful to the women who participated in this study, to Young Shin, Executive Director of Asian Immigrant Women Advocates (AIWA) for supporting and contributing to this project, and to AIWA staff MuTing Cen and Dennis Yee for facilitating the research. Graduate students Chi Cheng Wat and Justin Kong conducted interviews and Chi Cheng Wat, Justin Kong, Michael Lee, and Angela Hick transcribed, translated, and/or coded them. We would like to acknowledge the funding of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant “Gender Migration and the Work of Care,” No: 895-2012-1021.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In China, from the 1950s to the 1970s, and especially during the Cultural Revolution, Confucian notions of sons’ respect for parental authority and wives’ submission to husbands and in-laws, were attacked in favor of loyalty to the Party and an ideology of the broader collective. Yet because legislation and institutions continued to emphasize family obligations for welfare, gendered duty to parents remained, especially in rural areas, although responsibilities shifted from sons to daughters. The 1978 move away from a purely planned economy toward a more market-based one eroded nascent support for welfare in urban collective enterprises, and new notions of filial duty were mobilized (Qi 2014; Zhan and Montgomery 2003).
- 2.
ULTCWU was an amalgamation of SEIU and American Federation of State and County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) locals. At the time of writing, the union had amalgamated more locals into a new, larger entity—SEIU 2015—allowing them to bargain with the California government at a single table for all counties covered by the Independent Provider model discussed in this chapter, the dominant model in California.
- 3.
The authors have been unable to confirm this number.
References
Anderson, Bridget. 2000. Doing the Dirty Work?: The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. New York and London: Zed Books.
Bakan, Abigail and Daiva Stasiulis. 2012. “The Political Economy of Migrant Live-in Caregivers: A Case of Unfree Labor?” In Legislated Inequality: Temporary Labor Migration in Canada, edited by Patti Tamara Lenard and Christine Straehle, 202–226. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Bonacich, Edna. 1973. “A Theory of Middleman Minorities.” American Sociological Review 38: 583–594.
Boris, Eileen and Jennifer Klein. 2012. Caring for America: Home Health Workers in the Shadow of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cancian, Francesca M. and Stacey J. Oliker, eds. 2000. Caring and Gender. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman Littlefield.
Chin, Margaret M. 2013. “Changing Expectations: Economic Downturns and Immigrant Chinese Women in New York City.” In Immigrant Women Workers in the Neoliberal Age, edited by Nilda Flores-Gonzalez, Anna Romina Guevarra, Maura Toro-Morn and Grace Chang, 117–132. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Chun, Jennifer Jihye. 2009. Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the United States. Ithaca: ILR Press.
Chun, Jennifer Jihye. 2016. “Building Political Agency and Movement Leadership: The Grassroots Organizing Model of Asian Immigrant Women Advocates.” Citizenship Studies 20: 379–395.
Chun, Jennifer and Cynthia Cranford. 2016. “From Sweatshops to Homes: How Immigrant Women Became Paid Care Workers in Oakland, California’s Chinatown.” Paper presented at international workshop on The Global Migration of Gendered Care Work, University of Vienna, Austria, July 5.
Chun, Jennifer Jihye, George Lipsitz and Young Shin. 2013. “Intersectionality as a Social Movement Strategy: Asian Immigrant Women Advocates.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38: 917–940.
Constable, Nicole. 2009. “The Commodification of Intimacy: Marriage, Sex, and Reproductive Labor.” Annual Review of Anthropology 38: 49–64.
Cranford, Cynthia. 2005. “From Precarious Workers to Unionized Employees and Back Again? The Challenges of Organizing Personal-Care Workers in Ontario.” In Self-Employed Workers Organize: Law, Policy, and Unions, edited by Cynthia Cranford, Judy Fudge Eric Tucker and Leah Vosko, 96–135. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
Cranford, Cynthia. 2014. “Towards Flexibility with Security for Migrant Care Workers: A Comparative Analysis of Personal Home Care in Toronto and Los Angeles.” In Migration and Care Labour: Theory, Policy and Politics, edited by Bridget Anderson and Isabel Shutes, 173–191. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cranford, Cynthia and Diana Miller. 2013. “Emotion Management from the Client’s Perspective: The Case of Personal Home Care.” Work, Employment & Society 27: 785–801.
Delp, Linda and Katie Quan. 2002. “Home Care Worker Organizing in California: An Analysis of a Successful Strategy.” Labor Studies Journal 27: 1–23.
Duffy, Mignon. 2005. “Reproducing Labor Inequalities: Challenges for Feminists Conceptualizing Care at the Intersections of Gender, Race, and Class.” Gender & Society 19: 66–82.
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 1992. “From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labor.” Signs 18: 1–43.
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 2010. Forced to Care: Coercion and Caregiving in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2007. Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kwong, Peter. 1997. “Manufacturing Ethnicity.” Critique of Anthropology 17: 365–87.
Lan, Pei-Chia. 2002. “Subcontracting Filial Piety: Elder Care in Ethnic Chinese Immigrant Families in California.” Journal of Family Issues 23: 812–835.
Liu, Z.-D. 1998. Women’s Medical Sociology. Taipei: Feminist Bookstore.
Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2015. Servants of Globalization: Migration and Domestic Work, Second Edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Qi, Xiaoying. 2014. “Filial Obligations in Contemporary China: Evolution of the Culture-System.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45:142–161.
Stacey, Clare and Linsey Ayers. 2012. “Caught Between Love and Money: The Experiences of Paid Family Caregivers.” Qualitative Sociology 35: 47–64.
Tronto, Joan and Berenice Fisher. 1990. “Towards a Feminist Theory of Caring.” In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, edited by Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson, 35–62. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Twigg, Julia. 2000. Bathing: The Body and Community Care. London: Routledge.
Ungerson, Claire. 1999. “Personal Assistants and the Disabled: An Examination of a Hybrid Form of Work and Care.” Work, Employment & Society 13: 583–600.
Williams, Fiona. 2011. “Towards a Transnational Analysis of the Political Economy of Care.” In Feminist Ethics and Social Policy, edited by Rianne Mahon and Fiona Robinson, 21–39. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Zelizer, Viviana. 2000. “The Purchase of Intimacy.” Law and Social Inquiry 25: 817–48.
Zhan, Heying Jenny and Rhonda J. V. Montgomery. 2003. “Gender and Elder Care in China: The Influence of Filial Piety and Structural Constraints.” Gender & Society 17: 209–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cranford, C., Chun, J.J. (2017). Immigrant Women and Home-Based Elder Care in Oakland, California’s Chinatown. In: Michel, S., Peng, I. (eds) Gender, Migration, and the Work of Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55086-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55086-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55085-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55086-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)