Skip to main content

Supporting the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines Implementation in Senegal: Alternatives to Top-Down Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 14))

Abstract

The Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication (SSF Guidelines) provide a generally accepted framework that emerged from 3 years of intense bottom-up consultations and that were finally endorsed by the FAO’s Fisheries Committee (COFI) in 2014. Chapter 11 emphasizes the importance of information, research, and communication that is accessible to and involves small-scale fishers and their communities. Research questions in conventional research tend to meet the needs of donors or partners while the needs of the researched are only purportedly addressed. In this chapter, we explore types of research that attempt to understand local knowledge produced and seek ways to facilitate communication and exchange between different modes of knowledge production that overcome the sense of exclusion currently experienced by small-scale operators. The ability to access other sources of knowledge is important to their coping strategies, especially under conditions of advanced globalization of markets for fisheries products that result in changing working and living conditions. Field research conducted with fishers and summarized here focus on fishers’ knowledge and perceptions. Implementing the SSF Guidelines will require a sustained process of building trust, mutual understanding, and institutional arrangements that enable respectful multi-directional communication and exchange. Our research suggests that where such conditions are created and sustained, they form a robust base for participatory and legitimate management and thus retain many of the positive social and distributional dimensions that could make small-scale fisheries central to food security and sustainable livelihoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ANSD. (2015). Situation économique et sociale du Sénégal en 2012. Chapitre 12 (pp. 201–211). Pêche maritime. Dakar: Agence nationale de la statistique et de la démographie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy, C. (2005). Les savoirs locaus: entre connaissances et reconnaissance. VertigO – La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 6(1). https://vertigo.revues.org/2997. Accessed 15 Sept 2016.

  • Berkes, F., Mahon, R., McConney, P., Pollnac, R., & Pomeroy, R. (2001). Managing small-scale fisheries. Alternative directions and methods. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, A. H. V., Carvalho, A. R., Angelini, R., & Christensen, V. (2016). More than anecdotes: Fishers ecological knowledge can fill gaps for ecosystem modeling. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0155655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugere, C. (2014). Mainstreaming gender in transboundary natural resources projects – The experience of the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME) project. Environmental Development, 11, 84–97. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2014.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD. (2010). Aichi biodiversity targets. Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/. Accessed 2 May 2016.

  • Christensen, S. & Thi, D. V. (2004). Biological evaluation of local ecological knowledge regarding ecosystem health and exploitation status in the shrimp fishery in South Vietnam. In 7th Asian Fisheries Forum, Penang, Malaysia, November 30–December 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., Liguori, L., Palomares, M. L. D., & Pauly, D. (2006). Bottom-up, global estimates of small-scale fisheries catches. Fisheries Centre Research Reports, 14(8), 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., Pascual-Fernández, J. J., Szeliánszky, E., Alegret, J. L., Fraga, J., & Jentoft, S. (2013). Marine protected areas: Rethinking their inception. Marine Policy, 39, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deme, M. (2012). Étude des connaissances socio-économiques des pêcheries de petits pélagiques au Sénégal. Commission Sous Régionale des Pêches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deme, M., & Kebe, M. (2000). Révue sectorielle de la pêche au Sénégal: Aspects socio-économiques. Dakar: Centre de recherches océanographiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz Medina, I. (2016). Denuncia director de Ecoceanos: Ley de Pesca Longueira es hija de la corrupción. El Clarín. http://www.elclarin.cl/web/noticias/medios-y-periodismo/22-medio-ambiente/15617-denuncia-director-de-ecoceanos-ley-de-pesca-longueira-es-hija-de-la-corrupcion.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2016.

  • FAO. (2008). Vue générale du secteur des pêches national – La République du Sénégal. In Profil des pêches et de l’aquaculture par pays. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ftp://ftp.fao.org/Fi/DOCUMENT/fcp/fr/FI_CP_SN.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2016.

  • FAO. (2015). Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, P., & Small, R. (2016). Understanding the social impact of protected areas: A community perspective. London: IIED Research Report. ISBN 978–1–78431-310-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, N., Funge-Smith, S., Siar, S., & Westlund, L. (2015). Towards the implementation of the SSF Guidelines in the Southeast Asia region. In Proceedings of the Southeast Asia regional consultation workshop on the implementation of the voluntary guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese, R., Demirel, N., Gianpaolo, C., Kleisner, K. M., & Winker, H. (2016). Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience. Fish and Fisheries. doi:10.1111/faf.12190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender in Aquaculture and Fisheries. (n.d.). Homepage. https://genderaquafish.org/. Accessed 13 Dec 2016.

  • Jerven, M. (2013). Poor numbers. How we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Cornell University Press, 187 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. R. (2010). Cooperative research and knowledge flow in the marine commons: Lessons from the Northeast United States. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jounot, M. (2016). Les océans: La voix des invisibles. Film documentaire. Portfolio Production, France/2016/52’. https://vimeo.com/ondemand/oceanslavoix. Accessed 10 Apr 2016.

  • Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, S. K. (1995). Marisquadoras of the shellfish revolution: The rise of women in co-management on Illa de Arousa, Galicia. Journal of Political Economy, 2, 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, S. K. (2013). Listening to sea lions. Currents of change from Galapagos to Patagonia. Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundus maris. (2015). New technology for small scale fisheries data collection. http://mundusmaris.org/index.php/en/review/other/1821-ss-fisheries-data. Accessed 30 Apr 2016.

  • Nauen, C. E. (1984). The artisanal fishery in Schlei Fjord, eastern Schleswig Holstein, Federal Republic of Germany. Studies and Reviews of the General Fisheries Council for the Mediterranean, 1(61), 403–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauen, C. E. (1999). New players make a mark in in ocean governance. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3), 328–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauen, C. E. (2002). How can collaborative research be more useful to fisheries management in developing countries? In J. M. McGlade, P. Cury, K. A. Koranteng, & N. J. Hardman-Mountford (Eds.), The Gulf of Guinea large marine ecosystem. Environmental forcing and sustainable development of marine resources (pp. 357–364). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nauen, C. E. (Ed.). (2005). Increasing impact of the EU’s international S&T cooperation for the transition towards sustainable development. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N. (2002). An essay on the fishworkers’ movement in India. In: A. Sall, A. Belliveau, & N. Nayak (Eds.), Conversations. A trialogue on power, intervention and organization in fisheries (pp. 289–341). Chennai: International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. E. (2007). Making the difference: Applying a logic of diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 6–20. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.27895335.

  • Palomares, M. L. D. & Pauly, D. (1993). FishBase as a repository of ethno-ichthyology or indigenous knowledge of fishes. In International Symposium on Indigenous Knowledge (IK) and Sustainable Development, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., & Zeller, D. (2016). Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nature Communications, 7. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10244.

  • République du Sénégal. (2013). Document introductif du Conseil interministériel sur la pêche. http://www.aprapam.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Document-introductif-du-conseil-intrministériel-sur-la-pêche_version-final.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2016.

  • République du Sénégal. (2015). Direction des pêches maritimes: Projet Régional des pêches en Afrique de l’Ouest (PRAO). Bulletin d’information trimestriel no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, R., Rosa Carvalho, A., & Angelini, R. (2014). Integrating fishermen knowledge and scientific analysis to assess changes in fish diversity and food web structure. Ocean and Coastal Management, 102, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle, K. (1993). External forces and change in traditional community-based fishery management systems in the Asia-Pacific region. MAST, 6(1/2), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle, K. (1997). The role of local management and knowledge systems in ICAM in the Pacific region: A review (Annex 10). In Anon. ACP-EU Fisheries Research Initiative. Proceedings of the third dialogue meeting Caribbean, Pacific and the European Union (pp. 121–130).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Seijo, J. C., & Charles, A. (2007). Challenges in the assessment and management of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Fisheries Research, 87(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, R. C., Charles, S., & Seijo, J. C. (Eds.). (2011). Coastal fisheries of Latin America and the Caribbean (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 544). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2004). Les pirogues font de la résistance: Histoire du Collectif national des pêcheurs artisans du Sénégal (CNPS). In A. Sall & N. Nayak (Eds.), Les pêcheurs artisans du Sud s’organisent: Inde et Sénégal. (pp. 59–120). Paris: Réseau des centres de documentation pour le développement et la solidarité internationale (RITIMO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2007). Loss of biodiversity: Representation and valuation processes of fishing communities. Social Science Information, 46(1), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2008). Etude sur le savoir écologique des pêcheurs artisans des petits pélagiques en Afrique du Nord-Ouest. CSRP – Projet BBI 13286: Pêche durable des petits pélagiques en Afrique Nord Ouest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2009). Relations entre pêche industrielle et pêche artisanale: Des frontières très vagues. In Capitalisation des expériences des pêcheurs et femmes de la pêche en matière de complémentarité entre secteurs industriel et artisanal dans quelques pêcheries ouest africaines. Document interne de travail du CREDETIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2012a). Contraintes d’accès aux ressources et nouvelles stratégies et tactiques développées par les pêcheurs d’espèces destinées à l’exportation. Présentation à l’Atelier co-organisé par le CNPS et le CREDETIP, 6 janvier 2012, Mbour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2012b). Job satisfaction in the coastal pelagic fisheries of Senegal. Social Indicators Research, 109(1), 25–38. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0053-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sall, A. (2013). La force et la persistance des répères identitaires. In A. Fontana, & A. Samba (Eds.), Artisans de la mer: Une histoire de la pêche maritime sénégalaise (pp. 50–63). Dakar: Autopublié, Imprimerie Rochette. ISBN 978–2–7466-5677-2.

  • Thiao, D., & Ngom-Sow, F. (2014). Statistiques de la pêche maritime sénégalaise en 2013: Pêche artisanale et Pêche thonière. Archives Scientifiques du Centre de Recherches Océanographiques de Dakar-Thiaroye, 223, 36 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiber, M., Berkes, F., Charles, A., & Kearney, J. (2004). Participatory research supporting community-based fishery management. Marine Policy, 28(6), 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. B., Hochet-Kibongui, A. M., & Nauen, C. E. (Eds.) (2005). Gender, fisheries and aquaculture: Social capital and knowledge for the transition towards sustainable use of aquatic ecosystems. Brussels: ACP-EU Fish Res Rep, (16), 128 p. ISSN 1025–3971/EUR 20432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. C. (1999). Fisheries science collaborations: The critical role of the community. Keynote presentation at the Conference on Holistic Management and the role of Fisheries and Mariculture in the Coastal Community, 11–12 November, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Sweden. http://www.oceandocs.org/bitstream/handle/1834/620/Co-Man45.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 11 Dec 2016.

  • Wilson, D. C., Raakjaer, J., & Degnbol, P. (2006). Local ecological knowledge and practical fisheries management in the tropics: A policy brief. Marine Policy, 30(6), 794–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). Senegal. http://www.worldfishing.net/news101/regional-focus/senegal. Accessed 11 Dec 2016.

  • Zeller, D., Palomares, M. L. D., Tavakolie, A., Ang, M., Belhabib, D., Cheung, W. W. L., Lam, V. W. Y., Sy, E., Tsui, G., Zylich, K., & Pauly, D. (2016). Still catching attention: Sea around us reconstructed global catch data, their spatial expression and public accessibility. Marine Policy, 70, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aliou Sall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sall, A., Nauen, C.E. (2017). Supporting the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines Implementation in Senegal: Alternatives to Top-Down Research. In: Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Barragán-Paladines, M., Franz, N. (eds) The Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines. MARE Publication Series, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55073-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55074-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics