Skip to main content

A Comic Confucius?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Why Can’t Philosophers Laugh?
  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

Part II analyses Chinese philosophical texts in order to examine how the comic and humour are employed in them. While Western philosophy is known for its exaltation of reason, Chinese philosophy is not. The veneration of abstract reason that is divorced from concrete experience and emotion is largely alien to Chinese culture. However, the constraints of convention and ritual are recognized, as is the perpetual inadequacy of language to convey experience. Chapter 5 examines the Analects attributed to Confucius and maintains that the comic does play an important role in this work, albeit a role that has not been acknowledged by conventional commentaries. Confucius is well known for the important role his philosophy accords to li 裡, (ritual propriety). The inculcation of these rituals cannot become mechanistic and empty. Confucius shares an aversion to what Bergson would call mechanism. If we just blindly follow ritual through social conformity, we do a disservice to the rituals themselves, which become lifeless and insincere. The comic is often used in these texts as an educative device that mocks people who use ritual in this sycophantic and pedantic manner. Using levity, Confucius attempts to prevent ritual from becoming moribund.

This chapter is derived in part from an article published in Asian Philosophy on December 2, 2014, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2014.983669

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Primary Sources

  • Confucius. (2010). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Trans. Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont. New York: Ballantine Books. (A) (Chinese and English text)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuangzi. (1968). The Complete Works of Chuang-tzu. Trans. Burton Watson. New York: Columbia University Press. (Zh)

    Google Scholar 

  • References to Confucius are by section number. References to Zhuangzi are by chapter and page number.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Alt, Wayne. (2005). “Ritual and Social Construction of Sacred Artifacts: An Analysis of Analects 6:25.” Philosophy East/West 55(3): 461–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger, and Henri Rosemont. (1998). “Introduction.” In The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, R. H. (1959). Oriental Humor. Tokyo: Hokoseido Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, Annping. (2007). The Authentic Confucius: A Life of Thought and Politics. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. (1972). The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Daniel. (2003). Zhu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon Commentary and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Kurtis. (2010). “The Propriety of Confucius: A Sense of Ritual.” Asian Philosophy 20(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbsmeier, Christopher. (1990). “Confucius Ridens: Humour in the Analects.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 50(1): 131–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knechtges, David. (1970). “Wit, Humor and Satire in Early Chinese Literature.” Monumenta Serica 29: 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, J. (2002). “Naturalness Revisited: Why Western Philosophers Should Study Confucius.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. Bryan van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Karyn Lynne. (2006). “‘Li’ in the Analects: Training in Moral Competence and the Question of Flexibility.” Philosophy East/West 56(1): 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Yutang (1967). “Lun Kongzi de youmo.” In 論孔的幽默. 1967. Beijing: Dehua Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, David. (1979). The Concept of Man in Contemporary China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. (2003). Confucius Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Xi. (1979). Lunyu jizhu 論語集注. Beijing: Jianyu Shanfeng.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Froese, K. (2017). A Comic Confucius?. In: Why Can’t Philosophers Laugh?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55044-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics