Abstract
Part II analyses Chinese philosophical texts in order to examine how the comic and humour are employed in them. While Western philosophy is known for its exaltation of reason, Chinese philosophy is not. The veneration of abstract reason that is divorced from concrete experience and emotion is largely alien to Chinese culture. However, the constraints of convention and ritual are recognized, as is the perpetual inadequacy of language to convey experience. Chapter 5 examines the Analects attributed to Confucius and maintains that the comic does play an important role in this work, albeit a role that has not been acknowledged by conventional commentaries. Confucius is well known for the important role his philosophy accords to li 裡, (ritual propriety). The inculcation of these rituals cannot become mechanistic and empty. Confucius shares an aversion to what Bergson would call mechanism. If we just blindly follow ritual through social conformity, we do a disservice to the rituals themselves, which become lifeless and insincere. The comic is often used in these texts as an educative device that mocks people who use ritual in this sycophantic and pedantic manner. Using levity, Confucius attempts to prevent ritual from becoming moribund.
This chapter is derived in part from an article published in Asian Philosophy on December 2, 2014, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2014.983669
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Primary Sources
Confucius. (2010). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Trans. Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont. New York: Ballantine Books. (A) (Chinese and English text)
Zhuangzi. (1968). The Complete Works of Chuang-tzu. Trans. Burton Watson. New York: Columbia University Press. (Zh)
References to Confucius are by section number. References to Zhuangzi are by chapter and page number.
Secondary Sources
Alt, Wayne. (2005). “Ritual and Social Construction of Sacred Artifacts: An Analysis of Analects 6:25.” Philosophy East/West 55(3): 461–69.
Ames, Roger, and Henri Rosemont. (1998). “Introduction.” In The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Blyth, R. H. (1959). Oriental Humor. Tokyo: Hokoseido Press.
Chin, Annping. (2007). The Authentic Confucius: A Life of Thought and Politics. New York: Scribner.
Fingarette, Herbert. (1972). The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper and Row.
Gardner, Daniel. (2003). Zhu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon Commentary and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hagen, Kurtis. (2010). “The Propriety of Confucius: A Sense of Ritual.” Asian Philosophy 20(1): 1–25.
Harbsmeier, Christopher. (1990). “Confucius Ridens: Humour in the Analects.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 50(1): 131–61.
Knechtges, David. (1970). “Wit, Humor and Satire in Early Chinese Literature.” Monumenta Serica 29: 79–98.
Kupperman, J. (2002). “Naturalness Revisited: Why Western Philosophers Should Study Confucius.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. Bryan van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lai, Karyn Lynne. (2006). “‘Li’ in the Analects: Training in Moral Competence and the Question of Flexibility.” Philosophy East/West 56(1): 69–83.
Lin, Yutang (1967). “Lun Kongzi de youmo.” In 論孔的幽默. 1967. Beijing: Dehua Press.
Munro, David. (1979). The Concept of Man in Contemporary China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Slingerland, Edward. (2003). Confucius Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Zhu, Xi. (1979). Lunyu jizhu 論語集注. Beijing: Jianyu Shanfeng.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Froese, K. (2017). A Comic Confucius?. In: Why Can’t Philosophers Laugh?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55044-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55044-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55043-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55044-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)