Advertisement

Formalization and Computation of Diabetes Quality Indicators with Patient Data from a Chinese Hospital

  • Haitong Liu
  • Annette ten Teije
  • Kathrin DentlerEmail author
  • Jingdong Ma
  • Shijing Zhang
Conference paper
  • 339 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10096)

Abstract

Clinical quality indicators are tools to measure the quality of healthcare and can be classified into structure-related, process-related and outcome-related indicators. The objective of this study is to investigate whether Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from a Chinese diabetes specialty hospital can be used for the automated computation of a set of 38 diabetes quality indicators, especially process-related indicators. The clinical quality indicator formalization (CLIF) method and tool and SNOMED CT were adopted to formalize diabetes indicators into executable queries. The formalized indicators were run on the patient data to test the feasibility of their automated computation. In this study, we successfully formalized and computed 32 of 38 quality indicators based on the EMR data. The results indicate that the data from our Chinese EMR can be used for the formalization and computation of most diabetes indicators, but that it can be improved to support the computation of more indicators.

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus Clinical quality Quality indicators Electronic medical record Formalization Secondary use of patient data 

References

  1. 1.
    Donabedian, A.: The quality of care: how can it be assessed? Jama 260(12), 1743–1748 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dentler, K., Numans, M.E., ten Teije, A., et al.: Formalization and computation of quality measures based on electronic medical records. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(2), 285–291 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dentler, K., Cornet, R., ten Teije, A., et al.: The reproducibility of CLIF, a method for clinical quality indicator formalisation. In: MIE, pp. 113–117 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dentler, K., Cornet, R., ten Teije, A., et al.: Influence of data quality on computed Dutch hospital quality indicators: a case study in colorectal cancer surgery. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 14(1), 1 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, W., Guan, Z., Cao, H., et al.: Analysis and evaluation of the Electronic Health Record standard in China: a comparison with the American national standard ASTM E 1384. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80(8), 555–561 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weng, J.: Evolution in the Chinese diabetes society standards of care for type 2 diabetes. Diab. Metab. Res. Rev. 32(5), 440–441 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    White, P., Roudsari A.V.: From computer-interpretable guidelines to computer-interpretable quality indicators: a case for an ontology. In: ICIMTH, pp. 99–102 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beyan, O.D., Baykal, N.: A knowledge based search tool for performance measures in health care systems. J. Med. Syst. 36(1), 201–221 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Surján, G., Szilágyi, É., Kováts, T.: A pilot ontological model of public health indicators. Comput. Biol. Med. 36(7), 802–816 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newland, R.F., Baker, R.A., Stanley, R.: Electronic data processing: the pathway to automated quality control of cardiopulmonary bypass. J. Extra Corporeal Technol. 38(2), 139 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shabot, M.M.: Automated data acquisition and scoring for JCAHO ICU core measures. In: AMIA (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baldwin, K.B.: Evaluating quality of primary care using the electronic medical record. J. Healthc. Qual. 28(6), 40–47 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baldwin, K.B.: Evaluating healthcare quality using natural language processing. J. Healthc. Qual. 30(4), 24–29 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehrotra, A., Dellon, E.S., Schoen, R.E., et al.: Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest. Endosc. 75(6), 1233–1239 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garvin, J.H., DuVall, S.L., South, B.R., et al.: Automated extraction of ejection fraction for quality measurement using regular expressions in Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) for heart failure. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 19(5), 859–866 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown, S.H., Elkin, P.L., Rosenbloom, S.T., et al.: eQuality for all: extending automated quality measurement of free text clinical narratives. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2008, p. 71. American Medical Informatics Association (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown, S.H., Speroff, T., Fielstein, E.M., et al.: eQuality: electronic quality assessment from narrative clinical reports. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1472–1481 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haitong Liu
    • 1
  • Annette ten Teije
    • 2
  • Kathrin Dentler
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jingdong Ma
    • 1
  • Shijing Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine and Health ManagementHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations