Skip to main content

Four Horsemen (and a Horsewoman): What Gender Is New Atheism?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates

Abstract

This chapter looks at both what New Atheism has to say about gender and how it is itself performing gender. In order to explore these questions, we will first examine what New Atheism has had to say on gender by scrutinising each of the ‘four horsemen’s’ main publications on religion. This is followed by a discussion of Ayyan Hirsi Ali’s public introduction to the circle of four at the 2012 Melbourne Global Atheist Convention and the contribution made by this female face of New Atheism. We then go on to contextualise this by pondering the relationship between gender and atheism in general as well as New Atheism in particular. The ways in which the New Atheist protagonists perform masculinities invite us to reflect on the fact that these are specifically intellectual masculinities. Finally, some elements for an answer to the question of New Atheism’s gender are assembled—along with more questions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Non-apocalypse’ can be found on a range of websites referring to the Washington conversation; ‘anti-apocalypse’ was used for instance in 2011 (when Hitchens was still alive) by the Atheist Foundation of Australia announcing the horsemen’s appearance at the Melbourne Global Atheist Convention the following year.

  2. 2.

    This edition has a foreword by Christopher Hitchens , who writes about his friendship with Hirsi Ali.

  3. 3.

    Another Dutch critic of religion who has played a role in Hirsi Ali’s biography is Paul Cliteur , whom she remembers in Infidel as one of her professors at Leiden, as someone who believes in and defends reason. Hirsi Ali rejects the idea that his critiques of multiculturalism and Islam made him a right-wing conservative. Cliteur (2010) includes a discussion of Hirsi Ali’s debate with Tariq Ramadan.

  4. 4.

    The metaphor of the cage has also made it into one of her book titles as The Caged Virgin (Hirsi Ali 2008b).

  5. 5.

    On her contribution to the controversial short film Submission, see Jusová (2008).

  6. 6.

    Snel and Stock (2008, 131 fn. 1) do, however, concede that Infidel is less strident in these respects and not quite as generalising about Islam as some of Hirsi Ali’s political statements.

  7. 7.

    Such evidence is used to support ‘a version of the argument from evil’ (Overall 2007, 235). Overall herself is not convinced by feminist theologians’ attempts at redefining the divine, for ‘the attempts by some feminists to reconstruct God as feminine, as androgynous, as genderless, or as a Goddess are inadequate because they raise unanswered questions about the justification of belief in such a being’ (2007, 246).

  8. 8.

    Masculinity and maleness are, of course, often constructed as identical from an emic point of view. An example for this can be found in Furseth (2010, 226) with its male interviewee, Jan, for whom ‘a male identity excludes a religious identity.’

  9. 9.

    From the perspective of ideology critique, it seems that—through its protagonists—the New Atheist community, especially insofar as it identifies itself as ideal expression of the spirit of Western democracy, cannot but negate other communities. Proclamations on their lack of reason serve the functions of justificatory ideology (to outsiders and fence-sitters) and motivational reinforcement (to insiders).

References

  • Anderson, Robert. 2006. British Universities Past and Present. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989 [1987]. Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity And Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekiempis, Victoria. 2011. Why the New Atheism is a Boys’ Club. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/26/new-atheism-boys-club. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Black, Rachel, ed. 2010. Alcohol in Popular Culture: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, Mineke. 2008. Telling Stories, Creating (and saving) Her Life. An Analysis of the Autobiography of Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Women’s Studies International Forum 31: 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José. 2012 [1980]. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliteur, Paul. 2010. The Secular Outlook: In Defense of Moral and Political Secularism. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Raewyn. 2007. Intellectuals. In International Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities, ed. Michael Flood, Judith Kegan Gardiner, Bob Pease, and Keith Pringle, 338–339. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, Christopher R. 2011. Consciousness Raising: The Critique, Agenda, and Inherent Precariousness of Contemporary Anglophone Atheism. International Journal for the Study of New Religions 2 (1): 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davie, Grace. 2012. Belief and Unbelief: Two Sides of a Coin. Keynote Lecture, NSRN 2012 Conference, Goldsmiths, University of London, July 2012. Podcast available at: http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/davie/. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Dawkins, Richard. 2007a [2006]. The God Delusion. London: Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Bible Belter. The Times Literary Supplement, 6 September. Available from: http://www.the-tls.co.uk/tls/public/article759882.ece. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Dawkins, Richard, Daniel C. Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens. 2007. The Four Horsemen: A Roundtable Discussion with Richard Dawkins, Daniel C. Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRLYL1Q9x9g

  • Dawkins, Richard, Daniel C. Dennett, Sam Harris, Ayaan Hirsi Ali. 2012. Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris & Ayaan Hirsi Ali: A Celebration of Reason – 2012 Global Atheist Convention, Melbourne, Atheist Foundation of Australia. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOMjEJ3JO5Q

  • Dennett, Daniel C. 2007 [2006]. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 1982. The Axial Age: The Emergence of Transcendental Visions and the Rise of Clerics. European Journal of Sociology 23 (2): 294–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhart, Katie. 2013. From Hitchens to Dawkins: Where Are the Women of New Atheism? Available from: http://www.salon.com/2013/07/21/from_hitchens_to_dawkins_where_are_the_women_of_new_atheism/. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • Furseth, Inger. 2010. Atheism, Secularity, and Gender. In Atheism and Secularity. Vol. 1: Issues, Concepts, and Definitions, ed. Phil Zuckerman, 209–227. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Sam. 2006 [2004]. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsi Ali, Ayaan. 2008a [2007]. Infidel: My life. London: Simon & Schuster UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b [2004]. The Caged Virgin: An Emancipation Proclamation for Women and Islam. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, Christopher. 2007. God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011 [2010]. Hitch-22: A Memoir. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusová, Iveta. 2008. Hirsi Ali and Van Gogh’s Submission: Reinforcing the Islam vs. Women Binary. Women’s Studies International Forum 31: 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krech, Volkhart. 2009. Motor, Kritiker, Transformator: Drei Funktionen von Intellektuellen in der Religionsgeschichte. In Intellektuellen–Götter: Das religiöse Laboratorium der klassischen Moderne, ed. Friedrich Wilhelm Graf, 83–99. Munich: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahlamäki, Tiina. 2012. Religion and Atheism from a Gender Perspective. Approaching Religion 2 (1): 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, David. 2013. Sometimes It’s Hard to be a Man: Working-Class Students Struggle with “Composite Masculinity”, Study Finds. Times Higher Education, 23 May. Available from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/sometimes-its-hard-to-be-a-man/2004007.article. Accessed 26 Mar 2016.

  • McKeithan, Seán S. 2012. Every Ounce a Man’s Whiskey? Bourbon in the White Masculine South. Southern Cultures 18 (1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overall, Christine. 2007. Feminism and Atheism. In The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, ed. Michael Martin, 233–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipse, Herman. 2004. Atheïstisch manifest en De onredelijkheid van religie. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph. 2005. Power/Knowledge. In The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, ed. Gary Gutting, 95–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, Erik, and Femke Stock. 2008. Debating Cultural Difference: Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Islam and Women. In The Family in Question: Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities in Multicultural Europe, ed. Ralph D. Grillo, 113–133. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, Rebecca D., Kathleen M. Goodman, Charles Bermingham, and Saba R. Ali. 2013. Do Atheism and Feminism Go Hand-in-Hand? A Qualitative Investigation of Atheist Men’s Perspectives about Gender Equality. Secularism & Nonreligion 2: 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzebiatowska, Marta, and Steve Bruce. 2012. Why are Women more Religious than Men? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Finger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finger, A. (2017). Four Horsemen (and a Horsewoman): What Gender Is New Atheism?. In: Cotter, C., Quadrio, P., Tuckett, J. (eds) New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54964-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics