Advertisement

The Missing Element in New Atheist Critiques of Religion

  • Tamas Pataki
Chapter
Part of the Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures book series (SCPT, volume 21)

Abstract

Many of the leading ‘new atheists’, especially those who are biological or social scientists, but also some philosophers and others, have been concerned to provide naturalistic explanations of how religion evolved and of the factors that continue to sustain it. These explanations are intended to displace, and weaken the appeal of, the sorts of traditional accounts the religious themselves are apt to provide. The accounts are framed mostly in the terms of evolutionary psychology, of evolved cognitive mechanisms, genetic predisposition and neuroscience. Often they are little more than plausible conjecture, but that is not the project’s chief difficulty. Although some of the mechanisms invoked probably do play a part in the evolution of religious tendencies and the appeal of religion, they are insignificant compared to the psychosocial factors, especially the influence of the interactions between child and parental caretakers, which the new atheists almost completely ignore. Not understanding the deeper, emotional motivations to religion the new atheists largely misunderstand religion. (Misunderstanding religion they adopt polemical measures that alienate the moderate centres of religion and are especially ineffective against those religious manifestations—the Islamic and Jewish fundamentalists, the American Christian Right etc.—which really do need to be opposed). In ignoring the significance of childhood developmental factors and psychodynamic considerations these new atheists collude in a peculiar way with the religious: for one important function of religions precisely is to obscure the unconscious relations to parental figures internalized in childhood and to oneself, to distort them, and so to occlude self-understanding.

Keywords

Atheism Religion Fundamentalism Evolutionary psychology Cognitive anthropology Wish-fulfilment 

References

  1. Alush, Zvi. 2005. Rabbi: Hurricane Punishment for Pullout. Ynetnews.com. Available from http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3138779,00.html. Accessed 23 Aug 2016.
  2. Anderson, Abraham. 1997. The Treatise of the Three Imposters and the Problem of the Enlightenment. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, Justin. 2000. Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion. Trends in Cognitive Science 4 (1): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bellah, Robert N. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bering, Jesse. 2011. The God Instinct. London: Nicholas Brearley Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Black, David M., ed. 2006. Psychoanalysis and Religion in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Blackford, Russell, and Udo Schüklenk, eds. 2009. 50 Voices of Disbelief. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Bonett, Warren, ed. 2010. The Australian Book of Atheism. Melbourne: Scribe.Google Scholar
  10. Bowlby, John. 1998 [1980]. Loss: Sadness and Depression (Vol. 3 Attachment and Loss). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Boyer, Pascal. 2002. Religion Explained. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  12. Bremmer, Jan N. 2007. Atheism in Antiquity. In The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, ed. Michael Martin, 11–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Camus, Albert. 1991. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. Chicago: Houghton Miflin Company.Google Scholar
  15. Dennett, Daniel C. 2006. Breaking the Spell. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Dodds, E.R. 2004. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Faber, M.D. 2004. The Psychological Roots of Religious Belief. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  18. Fairbairn, William R.D. 1952. Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Fonagy, Peter, György Gergely, Elliot L. Jurist, and Mary Target. 2004. Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Books.Google Scholar
  20. Fotopoulou, Aikaterini, Donald Pfaff, and Martin A. Conway, eds. 2012. From the Couch to the Lab: Trends in Psychodynamic Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Freud, Sigmund. 1927. The Future of an Illusion. Standard Edition 21 ed. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1930. Civilisation and Its Discontents. Standard Edition 21 ed. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  23. Grayling, A.C. 2009. Why I Am Not a Believer. In 50 Voices of Disbelief, ed. Russell Blackford and Udo Schüklenk, 145–156. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guthrie, Stewart E. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2007. Anthropological Theories of Religion. In The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, ed. Michael Martin, 283–299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hitchens, Christopher. 2007. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, Mark. 2009. Saving God. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkpatrick, Lee A. 1999. Attachment and Religious Representations of Behaviour. In Handbook of Attachment, ed. Jude Cassidy and Phillip R. Shaver, 803–822. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Challenges for Secularism. In The Joy of Secularism, ed. George Levine, 24–56. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Levine, Michael. 2011. New Atheism, Old Atheism and the Rationality of Religious Belief. In The Relation of Philosophy to Religion Today, ed. Paolo Diego Bubbio and Philip Quadio, 154–177. Cambridge: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  31. Meissner, W.W. 1984. Psychoanalysis and Religious Experience. London: Yale.Google Scholar
  32. Nagel, Thomas. 2010. Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Oppy, Graham. 2011. “New Atheism” Versus “Christian Nationalism”. In The Relation of Philosophy to Religion Today, ed. Paolo Diego Bubbio and Philip Quadio, 118–153. Cambridge: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  34. Panksepp, Jaak, and Lucy Biven. 2012. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Pataki, Tamas. 2007. Against Religion. Melbourne: Scribe.Google Scholar
  36. Plantinga, Alvin. 2011. Where the Conflict Really Lies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Russell, Bertrand. 1957. Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
  38. Ruthven, Malise. 2005. Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2007. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schimmel, Solomon. 2008. The Tenacity of Unreasonable Beliefs: Fundamentalism and the Fear of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schore, Allan. 2003. Affect Regulation and the Repair of the Self. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Solms, Mark, and Oliver Turnbull. 2002. The Brain and the Inner World. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Thomson, J. Anderson Jr. 2011. Why We Believe in Gods. Charlottesville: Pitchstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations