New Atheism, Open-Mindedness, and Critical Thinking

  • Christopher R. CotterEmail author
Part of the Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures book series (SCPT, volume 21)


A common theme throughout the writings of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens is the importance of ‘critical thinking’. Not only do these authors believe that they themselves are critical thinkers, they also advocate critical thinking as a key element in their idealized atheistic future. This chapter has been written to assess the veracity of their claims to critical thinking in their engagements with ‘religion’, via an engagement with related literature on ‘open-mindedness,’ particularly the work of William Hare and Harvey Siegel. An analysis of this nature is not merely of academic interest, but is of great importance given the popularity of their books both within and outside the atheistic milieu, the near-canonical status that they have achieved, and the effects of their rhetoric upon the beliefs and practices of individuals in the ‘real’ world. The argument in this chapter flows sequentially through delineations of the concepts of ‘open-mindedness’ and ‘critical thinking’, and a demonstration of the New Atheists’ valorization of critical thinking, before discussing open-mindedness as a constituent part of critical thinking, and then building a three stage argument to demonstrate that the New Atheists are not open-minded, and that therefore they are not critical thinkers (in the context of their most popular considerations of ‘religion’).


New atheism Open-mindedness Critical thinking Scientism Richard Dawkins William Hare 


  1. Adams, Douglas. 2009 [1992]. Mostly Harmless. London: Pan.Google Scholar
  2. Amarasingam, Amarnath. 2010. To Err in Their Ways: The Attribution Biases of the New Atheists. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 39 (4): 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baehr, Jason. 2011. The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailin, Sharon. 2005. What Is Critical Thinking? In Key Questions for Educators, ed. William Hare and John P. Portelli, 54–57. Halifax: Edphil Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bailin, Sharon, and Harvey Siegel. 2003. Critical Thinking. In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education, ed. Nigel Blake, Paul Smeyers, Richard Smith, and Paul Standish, 181–193. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bartlett, Robert. 1995. The Making of Europe: Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change 950–1350. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Burnett, Thomas. 2012. What Is Scientism? AAAS. Accessed 8 Mar 2016.
  8. Callan, Eamonn, and Dylan Arena. 2009. Indoctrination. In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, ed. Harvey Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cavanaugh, William. 2009. The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotter, Christopher R. 2011. Consciousness Raising: The Critique, Agenda, and Inherent Precariousness of Contemporary Anglophone Atheism. International Journal for the Study of New Religions 2 (1): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2015. Without God Yet Not Without Nuance: A Qualitative Study of Atheism and Non-religion Among Scottish University Students. In Atheist Identities: Spaces and Social Contexts, ed. Lori G. Beaman and Steven Tomlins, 171–194. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Critchley, Simon. 2001. Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawkins, Richard. 2004. The Great Convergence. In A Devil’s Chaplain: Selected Essays, 173–179. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2007. The God Delusion. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2012. The Magic of Reality: How We Know What’s Really True. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  16. Dennett, Daniel C. 2007. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2010. Introduction. In This Will Change Everything: Ideas That Will Shape the Future, ed. John Brockman, xxii–xxiii. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, John. 1986. How We Think. In John Dewey: The Later Works, ed. J.A. Boydston, vol. 8, 2nd ed., 107–352. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halpern, Diane F. 1989. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Hare, William. 1979. Open-Mindedness and Education. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1985. In Defence of Open-Mindedness. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2003a. Is It Good to Be Open-Minded? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2003b. The Ideal of Open-Mindedness and Its Place in Education. Journal of Thought 38 (2): 3–10.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2004. Open-Minded Inquiry: A Glossary of Key Concepts. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 23(3): 37–41. Available at Accessed 22 Jan 2016.
  25. ———. 2005. What Is Open-Mindedness? In Key Questions for Educators, ed. William Hare and John P. Portelli, 16–19. Halifax: Edphil Books.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, Sam. 2006. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason. London: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2007. Letter to a Christian Nation: A Challenge to Faith. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2012. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. London: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  29. Hitchens, Christopher. 2008. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2012. The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
  31. Hook, Sydney. 1944. Naturalism and Democracy. In Naturalism and the Human Spirit, ed. Yervant H. Krikorian, 40–64. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1961. The Quest for Being. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hooper, Simon. 2006. The Rise of the ‘New Atheists’. CNN Website, November 9. Accessed 8 Mar 2016.
  34. Housley, Norman. 2006. Contesting the Crusades. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, Paul. 2008. Re-enchanting Europeans: Michael Burleigh and Political Religion Theory. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 9 (1): 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kidd, Ian James. 2014. Doing Away with Scientism. Philosophy Now 102: 30–31.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2016. Is Scientism Epistemically Vicious? In Scientism: Prospects and Problems, eds. Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg, unpaginated pre-publication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Knott, Kim, Elizabeth Poole, and Teemu Taira. 2013. Media Portrayals of Religion and the Secular Sacred: Representation and Change. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. LeDrew, Stephen. 2012. The Evolution of Atheism Scientific and Humanistic Approaches. History of the Human Sciences 25 (3): 70–87. doi: 10.1177/0952695112441301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, Lois. 2015. Ambivalent Atheist Identities: Power and Non-religious Culture in Contemporary Britain. Social Analysis 59 (2): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGarry, John, and Brendan O’Leary. 1995. Explaining Northern Ireland; Broken Images. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. McGrath, Alister. 2005. The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  43. Moon, Jennifer. 2008. Critical Thinking: An Exploration of Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Murray, Gilbert. 1955. Five Stages of Greek Religion. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  45. Nall, Jeff. 2008. Fundamentalist Atheism and Its Intellectual Failures. Humanity and Society 32: 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pigliucci, Massimo. 2013. New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1): 142–153. doi: 10.1111/misp.12006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pinker, Steven. 2012. The Better Angels of Our Nature: A History of Violence and Humanity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Prawer, Joshua. 1972. The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem: European Colonialism in the Middle Ages. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  49. Quadrio, Philip A. 2011. Rousseau, Kant and Philosophical Auto- criticism: The Practical Ends of Critical Thinking. In Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, ed. Karin de Boer and Ruth Sonderegger, 48–65. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  50. ———. 2014. Locke, Secularism and the Justice of the Secular Solution: Towards a Self-Reflective Transcending of Secular-Self Understanding. In Secularisations and Their Debates: Perspectives on the Return of Religion in the Contemporary West, ed. Matthew Sharpe and Dylan Nickelson, 39–57. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riggs, Wayne. 2010. Open-Mindedness. Metaphilosophy 41 (1–2): 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ———. n.d.. In Progress. Insight, Open-Mindedness and Understanding. Accessed 8 Mar 2016.
  53. Russell, Bertrand. 1985. Free Thought and Official Propaganda. In Sceptical Essays. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
  54. Siegel, Harvey. 2008. Open-Mindedness, Critical Thinking and Indoctrination. In Open-Mindedness and the Virtues in Education: Conference Celebrating the Work of Professor William Hare. Halifax: Mount Saint Vincent University. Accessed 12 Apr 2014.
  55. ———. 2009. Open-Mindedness, Critical Thinking, and Indoctrination: Homage to William Hare. Paidensis 18 (1): 26–34.Google Scholar
  56. Sorell, Tom. 1991. Scientism: Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stahl, William A. 2010. One-Dimensional Rage: The Social Epistemology of the New Atheism and Fundamentalism. In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, ed. Amarnath Amarasingam, 98–108. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  58. Stewart, Robert B. 2008. Introduction: The Future of Atheism: An Introductory Appraisal. In The Future of Atheism: Alister McGrath and Daniel Dennett in Dialogue, ed. Robert B. Stewart, 1–16. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
  59. Taira, Teemu, and Ruth Illman. 2012. The New Visibility of Atheism in Europe. Approaching Religion 2 (1): 1–2.Google Scholar
  60. Tetlock, P.E. 1985. Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error. Psychology Quarterly 48 (3): 227–236.Google Scholar
  61. Tuckett, Jonathan. forthcoming. Orthodoxy Is Not Scientific: A Phenomenological Critique of Naturalism. In The Role of Methodological Naturalism in Religious Studies, ed. J. Blum. Brill.Google Scholar
  62. Wolf, Gary. 2006. The Church of the Non-believers. Wired, November. Accessed 8 Mar 2016.
  63. Zenk, Thomas. 2012. ‘Neuer Atheismus’: ‘New Atheism’ in Germany. Approaching Religion 2 (1): 36–51.Google Scholar
  64. ———. 2013. New Atheism. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, ed. Stephen Bullivant and Michael Ruse, 245–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics, Philosophy and ReligionLancaster UniversityLancashireUK

Personalised recommendations