Advertisement

Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Beyond Stenoses: Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

  • Suzette Elias-SmaleEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

At least half of (predominant) female patients with recurrent angina, without signs of obstructive CAD, have underlying coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Especially when signs of ischemia are present, this syndrome has an adverse prognosis. Patients with CMD have a characteristic symptom presentation, with a variety of traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Diagnostic testing and treatment are still a challenge, with much room for improvement.

Keywords

Cardiac syndrome X Classification CMD Coronary flow reserve (CFR) Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) Coronary reactivity testing (CRT) Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) Microvascular angina Non-obstructive CAD (NOCAD) Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) Vasospasm 

References

  1. 1.
    Shaw LJ, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S4–S20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bairey Merz CN, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S21–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel MB, et al. Imaging microvascular dysfunction and mechanisms for female-male differences in CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(4):465–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jespersen L, et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(6):734–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnston N, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Lagerqvist B. Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain? Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1331–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pepine CJ. Multiple causes for ischemia without obstructive coronary artery disease: not a short list. Circulation. 2015;131(12):1044–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pepine CJ, et al. Emergence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a woman’s problem and need for change in definition on angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(17):1918–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khuddus MA, et al. An intravascular ultrasound analysis in women experiencing chest pain in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a substudy from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). J Interv Cardiol. 2010;23(6):511–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee BK, et al. Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2015;131(12):1054–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marinescu MA, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and treatment strategies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(2):210–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin FY, et al. Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(5):510–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maddox TM, et al. Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1754–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murthy VL, et al. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129(24):2518–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson BD, et al. Persistent chest pain predicts cardiovascular events in women without obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NIH-NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischaemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(12):1408–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gulati M, et al. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):843–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrmann J, Kaski JC, Lerman A. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(22):2771–2782b.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Camici PG, d’Amati G, Rimoldi O. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(1):48–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):830–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lanza GA, Crea F. Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2317–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Task Force M, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(38):2949–3003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ong P, et al. Increased coronary vasoconstrictor response to acetylcholine in women with chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms (cardiac syndrome X). Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101(8):673–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cosin-Sales J, et al. C-reactive protein, clinical presentation, and ischemic activity in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(9):1468–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crea F, Camici PG, Bairey Merz CN. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(17):1101–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wessel TR, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity is only partially predicted by atherosclerosis risk factors or coronary artery disease in women evaluated for suspected ischemia: results from the NHLBI Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Clin Cardiol. 2007;30(2):69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gianturco L, et al. Cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases in females: the role of microvasculature and dysfunctional endothelium. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(1):259–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faccini A, Kaski JC, Camici PG. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in chronic inflammatory rheumatoid diseases. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(23):1799–806.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodes-Cabau J, et al. Importance of diffuse atherosclerosis in the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in the proximal-mid segment of a coronary artery by myocardial fractional flow reserve measurements. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(4):483–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panza JA, et al. Investigation of the mechanism of chest pain in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries using transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(2):293–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wei J, et al. Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):646–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    von Mering GO, et al. Abnormal coronary vasomotion as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular events in women: results from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation. 2004;109(6):722–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pepine CJ, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2825–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ong P, et al. Clinical usefulness, angiographic characteristics, and safety evaluation of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing among 921 consecutive white patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. Circulation. 2014;129(17):1723–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, Ogawa H, Ong P, Sechtem U, Shimokawa H, Bairey Merz CN; Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS).International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J. 2015;4. pii:ehv351. [Epub ahead of print] Review.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meimoun P, Tribouilloy C. Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow and coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: a magic tool for the real world. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(4):449–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lanza GA, et al. Methods to investigate coronary microvascular function in clinical practice. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013;14(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schindler TH, et al. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):623–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Sechtem U. Treatment of angina pectoris associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016;30(4):351–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sen N, et al. Nebivolol therapy improves endothelial function and increases exercise tolerance in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2009;9(5):371–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lamendola P, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients with cardiac syndrome X. Int J Cardiol. 2010;140(2):197–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations