- 490 Downloads
Chapter 7 closes the book by summarizing the argument and by reflecting upon what the defensively bounded and largely labour-centric nature of the Private Military and Security Company PMSC presence might indicate for both future academic analysis and policymaking. In regards to proxy wars, this chapter considers the degree to which PMSCs can serve as proxies given their prominence combined with the pressures generated by the conventional forces norm and the state proclivity towards the offensive. In regards to other clients (i.e., developing world states and non-state actors), this chapter reveals what might be expected of firms, expectations that are constrained given the book’s findings. Finally, in regards to the future influence and impact of PMSCs, this chapter examines the division of tasks between states and PMSCs to suggest implications for both actors stemming from how security challenges are constructed and responded to.
KeywordsDeveloping World States Private Military Future Influence Proxy War Sophisticated Military Technology
- Bobbitt, P. (2002). The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Brauer, J. (2008). “Private Military Companies: Markets, Ethics, Economics.” In Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations, edited by A. Alexandra, D.P. Baker, and M. Caparini, 102–115. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Burke, C. (2012). “Like It or Not, Small Wars Will Always Be Around.” World Politics Review. Retrieved August 4, 2015, from http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/11238/like-it-or-not-small-wars-will-always-be-around.
- CNN. (2010). “Mullen: Debt is Top National Security Threat.” CNN. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/27/debt.security.mullen/.
- Cullen, P.J. (2009). “Private Security in International Politics: Deconstructing the State’s Monopoly of Security Governance.” Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Donini, A. (1998). “Asserting Humanitarianism in Peace-Maintenance.” In The Politics of Peace-Maintenance, edited by Jarat Chopra, 81–96. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
- Dunigan, M. (2011). Victory for Hire: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Globe and Mail. (2016). “Justin Trudeau: ‘Today’s Attack is Appalling and Cowardly’: Prime Minister Condemns Killing of 14 Canadian Embassy Security Guards.” Globe and Mail. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/taliban-bomber-kills-14-canadian-embassy-security-guards-in-kabul/article30519948/.
- Kaldor, M. (1987). “The Atlantic Technology Culture.” In Dealignment: A New Foreign Policy Perspective, edited by Mary Kaldor and Richard Falk, 143–162. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, C. (2006). Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Krahmann, E. (2012). “Commercial Risk Consulting and Management in the Maritime Sector.” In Maritime Private Security: Market Responses to Piracy, Terrorism and Waterborne Security Risks in the 21st Century, edited by C.G. Berube and P. Cullen, 181–192. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Maslow, A. (1966). The Psychology of Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Matlary, J.H. (2007). “Dangerous Dysfunction? Governing Integrated Military Force in Europe.” In Denationalisation of Defence: Convergence and Diversity, edited by Janne Haaland Matlary and Øyvind Østerud, 71–90. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Ortiz, C. (2010). Private Armed Forces and Global Security. Praeger: Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
- Schooner, S.L. (2008). “Why Contractor Fatalities Matter.” Parameters 38(3): 78–91.Google Scholar
- Serewicz, L.W. (2002). “Globalization, Sovereignty and the Military Revolution: From Mercenaries to Private International Security Companies.” International Politics 39(1): 75–89.Google Scholar
- Shearer, D. (1998). Private Armies and Military Intervention. Adelphi Paper 316. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
- Spearin, C. (2006–2007). “Special Operations Forces a Strategic Resource: Public and Private Divides.”Parameters 36(4): 58–70.Google Scholar
- Spearin, C. (2010). “The International Private Security Company: A Unique and Useful Actor?” In Modern War and the Utility of Force: Challenges, Methods and Strategy, edited by Jan Angstrom and Isabelle Duyvesteyn, 39–64. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ulriksen, S. (2007). “European Military Forces: Integration by Default.” In Denationalisation of Defence: Convergence and Diversity, edited by Janne Haaland Matlary and Øyvind Østerud, 47–69. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (2002). Private Military Companies: Options for Regulation: The Green Paper. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Vaux, T. et al. (2002). Humanitarian Action and Private Security Companies: Opening the Debate. London: International Alert.Google Scholar
- Zarate, J.C. (1998). “The Emergence of a New Dog of War: Private International Security Companies, International Law, and the New World Disorder.” Stanford Journal of International Law 34: 75–162.Google Scholar