Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Christopher Spearin
Chapter
Part of the New Security Challenges book series (NSECH)

Abstract

Chapter 7 closes the book by summarizing the argument and by reflecting upon what the defensively bounded and largely labour-centric nature of the Private Military and Security Company PMSC presence might indicate for both future academic analysis and policymaking. In regards to proxy wars, this chapter considers the degree to which PMSCs can serve as proxies given their prominence combined with the pressures generated by the conventional forces norm and the state proclivity towards the offensive. In regards to other clients (i.e., developing world states and non-state actors), this chapter reveals what might be expected of firms, expectations that are constrained given the book’s findings. Finally, in regards to the future influence and impact of PMSCs, this chapter examines the division of tasks between states and PMSCs to suggest implications for both actors stemming from how security challenges are constructed and responded to.

References

  1. Abrahamsen, R. and M.C. Williams. (2009). “Security Beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics.” International Political Sociology 3(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamsen, R. and M.C. Williams. (2010). Security Beyond the State: Private Security in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avant, D. and L. Sigelman. (2010). “Private Security and Democracy: Lessons from the US in Iraq.” Security Studies 19(2): 230–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobbitt, P. (2002). The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Brauer, J. (2008). “Private Military Companies: Markets, Ethics, Economics.” In Private Military and Security Companies: Ethics, Policies and Civil-Military Relations, edited by A. Alexandra, D.P. Baker, and M. Caparini, 102–115. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, C. (2012). “Like It or Not, Small Wars Will Always Be Around.” World Politics Review. Retrieved August 4, 2015, from http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/11238/like-it-or-not-small-wars-will-always-be-around.
  7. CNN. (2010). “Mullen: Debt is Top National Security Threat.” CNN. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/27/debt.security.mullen/.
  8. Cullen, P.J. (2009). “Private Security in International Politics: Deconstructing the State’s Monopoly of Security Governance.” Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  9. Donini, A. (1998). “Asserting Humanitarianism in Peace-Maintenance.” In The Politics of Peace-Maintenance, edited by Jarat Chopra, 81–96. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  10. Dunigan, M. (2011). Victory for Hire: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Globe and Mail. (2016). “Justin Trudeau: ‘Today’s Attack is Appalling and Cowardly’: Prime Minister Condemns Killing of 14 Canadian Embassy Security Guards.” Globe and Mail. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/taliban-bomber-kills-14-canadian-embassy-security-guards-in-kabul/article30519948/.
  12. Kaldor, M. (1987). “The Atlantic Technology Culture.” In Dealignment: A New Foreign Policy Perspective, edited by Mary Kaldor and Richard Falk, 143–162. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Kinsey, C. (2006). Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Krahmann, E. (2010). States, Citizens and the Privatization of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krahmann, E. (2012). “Commercial Risk Consulting and Management in the Maritime Sector.” In Maritime Private Security: Market Responses to Piracy, Terrorism and Waterborne Security Risks in the 21st Century, edited by C.G. Berube and P. Cullen, 181–192. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Leander, A. (2005). “The Power to Construct International Security: On the Significance of Private Military Companies.” Millennium 33(3): 803–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maslow, A. (1966). The Psychology of Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Matlary, J.H. (2007). “Dangerous Dysfunction? Governing Integrated Military Force in Europe.” In Denationalisation of Defence: Convergence and Diversity, edited by Janne Haaland Matlary and Øyvind Østerud, 71–90. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Mumford, A. (2013). “Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict.” RUSI Journal 158(2): 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ortiz, C. (2010). Private Armed Forces and Global Security. Praeger: Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  21. Percy, S. (2012). “Regulating the Private Security Industry: A Story of Regulating the Last War.” International Review of the Red Cross 94(887): 941–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phelps, M.L. (2014). “Doppelgangers of the State: Private Security and Transferable Legitimacy.” Politics & Policy 42(6): 824–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers, P. (2013). “Security by ‘Remote Control’. Can it work?” RUSI Journal 158(3): 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schooner, S.L. (2008). “Why Contractor Fatalities Matter.” Parameters 38(3): 78–91.Google Scholar
  25. Serewicz, L.W. (2002). “Globalization, Sovereignty and the Military Revolution: From Mercenaries to Private International Security Companies.” International Politics 39(1): 75–89.Google Scholar
  26. Shearer, D. (1998). Private Armies and Military Intervention. Adelphi Paper 316. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  27. Singer, P.W. (2001–2002). “Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International Security.” International Security 26(3): 186–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spearin, C. (2006–2007). “Special Operations Forces a Strategic Resource: Public and Private Divides.”Parameters 36(4): 58–70.Google Scholar
  29. Spearin, C. (2008). “Private, Armed, and Humanitarian? States, NGOs, International Private Security Companies and Shifting Humanitarianism.” Security Dialogue 39(4): 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spearin, C. (2010). “The International Private Security Company: A Unique and Useful Actor?” In Modern War and the Utility of Force: Challenges, Methods and Strategy, edited by Jan Angstrom and Isabelle Duyvesteyn, 39–64. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Thomson, J.E. (1996). Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ulriksen, S. (2007). “European Military Forces: Integration by Default.” In Denationalisation of Defence: Convergence and Diversity, edited by Janne Haaland Matlary and Øyvind Østerud, 47–69. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (2002). Private Military Companies: Options for Regulation: The Green Paper. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  34. Vaux, T. et al. (2002). Humanitarian Action and Private Security Companies: Opening the Debate. London: International Alert.Google Scholar
  35. Zarate, J.C. (1998). “The Emergence of a New Dog of War: Private International Security Companies, International Law, and the New World Disorder.” Stanford Journal of International Law 34: 75–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Spearin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Defence StudiesRoyal Military College of Canada/Canadian Forces CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations