Advertisement

Social Media as Theatre Stage: Aesthetics, Affordances and Interactivities

  • Bree HadleyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers the ways in which social media is being deployed to produce, document and disseminate mainstage and independent theatre works. It examines examples from the USA, the UK, Europe and Australia—streamed performances of Shakespeare by the National Theatre, streamed performances of contemporary plays such as The Radicalisation of Bradley Manning by the National Theatre of Wales, the use of networked, telematic, participatory, augmented and virtual reality themes and/or techniques in works such as Adam Cass’sILove You Bro, Liesel Zink’s Various Selves, The Builders Association’s Continuous City, Paul Sermon’s Telematic Dreaming, Blast Theory’s Desert Rain, Upton’s Ritual Circle, the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) and Mudlark’s Such Tweet Sorrow, RSC and Google Creative Lab’s A Midsummer Night’s Dreaming, Punchdrunk’s Sleep No More, New Paradise Laboratories’ Fatebook: Avoiding Catastrophe One Party At A time, La Pocha Nostra’s Ethno-Cyberpunk Trading Post, Wafaa Bilal’s Domestic Tension , Brian Lobel’s Purge , Sarah Rodigari’s Reach Out Touch Faith, @Platea’s Co-Modify, Jeffrey Cranor’s tweet plays and Ai Wei Wei’s self-performances online, along with online theatre platforms and archives such as Upstage, Waterwheel, the Hemispherica archive, the Anarcha anti-archive and the AusStage database. The breadth of these practices, and of the relations between producers, performers and spectators that play out in them, provides the basis for an analysis of why so many mainstage companies still tend to use social media theatre as transmedia marketing for their core programmes rather than use it their core programmes in the waythat independent, activist and political artists do.

References

  1. Arroyo, Jose. 2014. Screening Shakespeare: Coriolanus Doesn’t Captivate at the Multiplex. The Conversation, 5 Dec 2014. http://theconversation.com/screening-shakespeare-coriolanus-doesnt-captivate-at-the-multiplex-22682. Accessed 5 Jan 2015.
  2. Ates, Alex. 2014. The World Wide Theater at Our Fingertips. HowlRound, 27 Aug 2014. http://howlround.com/the-world-wide-theater-at-our-fingertips. Accessed 9 Jan 2015.
  3. Auslander, Philip. 2008. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Balme, Christoper. 2014. The Theatrical Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, Susan. 1997. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production an Reception, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bolter, Jay David, Blair MacIntyre, Michael Nitsche, and Kathryn Farley. 2013. Liveness, Presence, and Performance in Contemporary Digital Media. In Thorughout: Art and Culture Emerging with Ubiuqitous Computing, ed. Ulrike Ekman, 323–336. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bravo, Britt. 2009. 5 Ways Theatres Can Use Social Media. Cultural Entrepreneurship Blog. Global Centre for Cultural Entrepreneurship, 10 Aug 2009. http://culturalentrepreneur.org/blog/5-ways-theatres-can-use-social-media. Accessed 5 Aug 2013.
  8. Blake, Elissa. 2010. Geeks, Tweets and Bums on Seats: How Social Media Is Shaping the Arts in Australia. Sydney Morning Herald. 10 July 2010. http://www.smh.com/au/entertainment/theatre/geeks-tweets-and-bums-on-seats-20100709-103g8.html. Accessed 9 Aug 2013.
  9. Butsch, Richard. 2008. The Citizen Audience: Crowds, Publics and Individuals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carson, Christie. 2014. Creating a Model for the Twenty-First Century. In Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice, ed. Christie Carson, and Peter Kirwan, 226–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carson, Christie, and Peter Kirwan. 2014. Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatzichristodoulou, Maria 2010. Cybertheatres: Emergent Networked Performance Practices. PhD thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
  13. Chatzichristodoulou, Maria, Janis Jeffries, and Rachel Zerihan. 2009. Interfaces of Performance. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Conner, Lynne. 2013. Audience Engagement and the Role of Arts Talk in the Digital Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixon, Steve. 2007. Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Downes, Daniel. 2005. Interactive Realism: The Poetics of Cyberspace. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, Elizabeth. 2011. Transmedia Television: Audiences, New Media and Daily Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Giannachi, Gabriella. 2004. Virtual Theatres: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, Beryl. 1997. A Study of Audience Relationships with Interactive Computer-Based Visual Artworks in Gallery Settings, through Observation, Art Practice, and Curation, PhD thesis, University of Sunderland, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, Jonathan. 2012. Web 2.0 and Collaborative On-Line Performance. Text and Performance Quarterly 32 (1): 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hadley, Bree. 2014. Disability, Public Space Performance and Spectatorship: Unconscious Performers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadley, Bree. 2008a. 080808 UpStage Festival. Australian Stage Online Sunday 10 Aug 2008. http://www.australianstage.com.au/reviews/international/080808-upstage-festival-1745.html.
  23. Hadley, Bree. 2010. Teenage Loner in a Chat Room Tangled up in Guile and Gullibility. The Australian July 26 2010. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/arts/teenage-loner-in-a-chat-room-tangled-up-in… 8 Aug 2010.
  24. Heim, Caroline. 2015. Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2014. Emplotting a Storyworld in Drama: Selection, Time, and Construal in the Discourse of Hamlet. In Storyworlds Across Media: Towards a Media-Conscious Narratorology, ed. Marie-Laure Ryan, and Jan-Noel Thon, 50–66. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland, Peter. 2009. Performing Shakespeare for the Web Community. In Shakespeare in Hollywood, Asia. and Cyberspace, ed. Alexander C.Y. Huang, and Charles S. Ross, 252–262. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hollander, Barbara Gottfried. 2014. Participating in Plays, Skits, and Debates with Cool New Digital Tools. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  28. Hope, Cat, and John Ryan. 2014. Digital Arts: An Introduction to New Media. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jenkins, Henry. 2003. Transmedia Storytelling. Technology Review, 15 January 2003. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, Amelia, and Adrian Healthfield. 2012. Perform, Repeat, Record: Live Art in History. Bristol and Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  32. Jordan, Richard. 2014. Digital Alchemy: The Posthuman Drama of Adam J.A. Cass’s I Love You Bro. In Digital Performance Futures in Australasia, ed. Glenn D’Cruz and Gorkem Acaroglu. Australasian Drama Studies 65: 37–52.Google Scholar
  33. Kozel, Susan. 2007. Closer: Performances, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kuksa, Iryna, and Mark Childs. 2014. Making Sense of Space: The Design and Experience of Virtual Spaces as a Tool for Communication. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Lehmann, Hans Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lonergan, Patrick. 2016. Theatre & Social Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mandell, Jonathan. 2013. Social Media On Stage: Theater Meets Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Tumbler, Soundcloud. New York Theater, 3 Jan 2013. http://newyorktheater.me/2013/01/03/social-media-on-stage-theater-meets-twitterfacebookyoutube-tumbler-soundcloud/. Accessed 27 Nov 2014.
  38. Murnane, Ingrid. 2009a. Co-Modify: Were You Hoodwinked? @Platea: A Global Online Public Art Collective, Blogger 13 May 2009. Accessed 19 Aug 2013.Google Scholar
  39. Murnane, Ingrid. 2009b. Some More Co-Modify Performance Highlights. @Platea: A Global Online Public Art Collective, Blogger 6 May 2009. Accessed 19 Aug 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Nelson, Ryan. 2014. Developing a Digital Straetgy: Engaging Audiences at Shakespeare’s Globe. In Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice, ed. Christie Carson, and Peter Kirwan, 202–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neri, Louise. 2008. Culture: The Builders Association. Interview 27 November 2008. http://www.interviewmagazine.com/culture/theatre-the-builders-association#_. Accessed 18 Aug 2013.
  42. O’Neill, Stephen. 2014. Shakespeare and YouTube: New Media Forms of the Bard. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parker-Starbuck, Jennifer. 2014. Cyborg Theatre: Corporeal/Technological Intersections in Multimedia Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Price, Tim. 2012. The Radicalisation of Bradley Manning. The National Theatre of Wales. https://www.nationaltheatrewales.org/bradleymanning.
  46. Prior, Yoni. 2014. Impossible Triangles: Flat Actors in Telematic Theatre. Australasian Drama Studies 65: 168–190.Google Scholar
  47. Purcell, Stephen. 2014. The Impact of New Forms of Public Performance. In Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice, ed. Christie Carson, and Peter Kirwan, 212–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reason, Matthew. 2003. Archive or Memory? The Detritus of Live Performance. New Theatre Quarterly 19 (1): 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reason, Matthew. 2006. Documentation, Disappearance and the Representation of Live Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rodigari, Sarah, with Sofaer, Joshua. 2012. Reach Out Touch Faith, Going Nowhere [Festival], Arts House Melbourne Australia. Available online http://goingnowhere.net.au/program/reach-out/.
  51. Rumbold, Kate. 2010. From “Access” to “Creativity”: Shakespeare Institutions, New Media, and the Language of Cultural Value. Shakespeare Quarterly 61.3: 313–336. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/shq/summary/v061/61.3.rumbold.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.
  52. Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2001. Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ryan, Marie-Laure and Thon, Jan-Noel, ed. 2014. Storyworlds Across Media: Towards a Media-Conscious Narratorology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  54. Sant, Toni. 2008. A Second Life for Online Performance: Understanding Present Developments through an Historical Context. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 4 (1): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sant, Toni. 2009. Performance in Second Life: Some Possibilities for Learning and Teaching. In Learning and Teaching in the Virtual World of Second Life, ed. Judith Molka-Sanielsen, and Mats Deutschmann, 145–166. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sant, Toni. 2013. Theatrical Performance on the Internet: How Far Have We Come Since Hamnet? International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 9 (2): 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sant, Toni. 2014. Art, Performance, and Social Media. In Routledge Handbook of Social Media, ed. Jeremy Hunsinger, and Theresa M. Senft, 45–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Schnieder, Rebecca. 2012. Performance Remains. In Perform, Repeat, Record: Live Art in History, ed. Amelia Jones and Adrian Healthfield, 137–150. Bristol and Chicago: Intellect. http://www.trincoll.edu/Academics/centers/TIIS/Documents/Schneider-Oct.%203.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.
  59. Schrumm, Stephen A. (ed.). 1999. Theatre in Cyberspace: Issues of Teaching, Acting and Directing. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  60. Schrumm, Stephen. 2009. Theatre in Second Life® Holds the VR Mirror up to Nature. In Handbook of Research on Computational Arts and Creative Informatics, ed. James Braman, Giovanni Vincenti, and Goran Trajkovski, 376–395. Hershey: IGA Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevens, Lara. 2014. Alienation in the Information Age: Wafaa Bilal’s Domestic Tension. Australasian Drama Studies 65: 77–98.Google Scholar
  62. Trueman, Matt. 2012. Noises Off: Will Social Media Change the Face of Theatre. Theatre Blog. The Guardian 26 April 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/theatreblog/2012/apr/26/noises-off-social-media-theatre. Accessed 27 Nov 2014.
  63. Upton, Ian. 2014. Creating Experiences for Virtual Spaces. In Making Sense of Space: The Design and Experience of Virtual Spaces as a Tool for Communication, ed. Iryna Kuksa, and Mark Childs, 128–133. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  64. Vargas, Vivianna. 2014. The Big Merge: Internet and Theatre. HowlRound 14 September 2014. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  65. Varley Jamieson, Helen. 2008. Adventures in Cyberformance: Experiments at the Interface of Theatre and the Internet. MA thesis, Queensland University of Technology. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28544/1/Helen_Jamieson_Thesis.pdf.
  66. Walser, Randal. 1991. Elements of a Cyberspace Playhouse. In Virtual Reality: Theory, Practice, and Promise, ed. Sandra K. Helsel, and Judith P. Roth, 51–64. Westport: Meckler.Google Scholar
  67. Watts, Richard. 2013. How to Be a Good Audience. ArtsHub 11 Nov 2013. http://www.artshub.com.au/news-article/features/performing-arts/how-to-be-a-good-audience-193438. Accessed 27 Nov 2014.
  68. Way, Geoffrey. 2011. Social Shakespeare: Romeo and Juliet, Social Media, and Performance. Journal of Narrative Theory 41 (3): 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Westbrook, Cathy. 2014. How to stage theatre’s online future, The Guardian Theatre blog with Lyn Gardiner, Monday 14 April 2014. Available online http://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2014/apr/14/stage-theatre-online-future.
  70. White, Gareth. 2013. Audience Participation in Theatre: Aesthetics of the Invitation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Worthen, William B. 2014. Shakespeare Performance Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations