Skip to main content

The Economy Strikes Back; Convergence, Divergence and Imbalances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development

Abstract

Major changes have characterized the international economy since the ’70s. Asian growth, in China in particular, is changing the economic relations and development cooperation , with many emerging countries now becoming ‘new donors’. International finance has boomed to a level almost 10 times larger than world GDP ; however, financial crises are a recurrent phenomenon. Income distribution has been worsening in many countries: income and wealth are highly concentrated in the top 10% and top 1% of the population . Since the 2007 crisis, economic growth has slowed. Is this a secular stagnation? Large trade ‘imbalances’ and protectionist policies have emerged. Developing countries are experiencing huge migration outflows. All these economic forces can affect the long-run progress towards sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On five imbalances UNCTAD (2017: 152).

  2. 2.

    For a history of the ‘Flying Geese’ model, see Kasahara (2013).

  3. 3.

    Emerging markets are important players in the world economy and in international cooperation, where they also constitute the main block of the so-called new donors.

  4. 4.

    The emergence of new economic powers , or ‘new donors’, not members of the OECD-DAC , implies that many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have the possibility to move beyond the economic relations of the post-colonial period, during which they maintained major economic links with the former colonial powers and with a limited number of other high-income countries.

  5. 5.

    Between 1995 and 2012, South–South exchanges doubled their share in world trade.

  6. 6.

    The incredible amounts achieved by financial markets have been called ‘The dance of the trillions’ (Palma 2009: 833).

  7. 7.

    Remittances include only the officially registered ones, while hundreds of billions are assumed to enter developing countries in an unofficial way.

  8. 8.

    More on this topic can be found in Vaggi (2018).

  9. 9.

    The countries hit by the debt crisis of the eighties were: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Sudan, Yugoslavia, Poland, Hungary, Turkey, Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, The Philippines, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Portugal (Vaggi 1993).

  10. 10.

    In Sub-Saharan Africa, the average GNI per capita declined from 1278 US$ (constant 2010 prices) in 1984 to 1123 US$ in 1998 (World Bank , World Development Report 1986 and 1999/2000).

  11. 11.

    There are many similarities between some African countries today and some Latin American and Asian countries in the eighties and nineties, respectively.

  12. 12.

    The story of the 1992 EMS collapse is more complicated than this; only the essential elements are highlighted here. On the financial crises , see also Moro and Beker (2015).

  13. 13.

    However, the share of investments in GDP decreased from 35 to 25%.

  14. 14.

    Thanks to large devaluations , most countries recovered rather fast; Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines followed patterns similar to the Korean one, although the crisis was much deeper and longer in Indonesia (Vaggi 2002).

  15. 15.

    The expression carrying trade can be found in the Mercantilist literature, where it refers to the physical transportation of commodities (Rubin 1929: 50–51).

  16. 16.

    In the second part of the nineties, this mechanism already played an important role in bringing large capital inflows into emerging markets , namely, into Latin America.

  17. 17.

    Blanchard et al. expect no major changes in nominal rates in the coming years, but they also stress the fact that forecasts of future global rates are very tricky (Blanchard et al. 2014: 106).

  18. 18.

    The combination of the two ‘inequalities’, among and within, determines the so-called global inequality (Milanovic 2012, 2016).

  19. 19.

    A criticism of the weak theoretical grounds of Piketty’s analysis is in Garbellini (2018).

  20. 20.

    For a comment of Piketty’s book, see Milanovic (2014).

  21. 21.

    Active fiscal policies can reduce ‘net inequality’, after taxes and transfers, with respect to ‘market inequality’, before state transfers; net inequality is positively correlated with economic growth (Ostry and Berg 2014). In Latin America, some successful policies have contributed to a decrease in inequality (Cornia 2014).

  22. 22.

    In China, some regions along the coast have incomes per capita which are almost three times higher than those of internal regions.

  23. 23.

    As Palma writes ‘about 80 per cent of the world’s population now live in regions whose median country has a Gini not far from 40’ (Palma 2011: 2, 10–12).

  24. 24.

    This is the ratio of the first decile to the bottom 40% of the population, which derives from the observation that the share of income accruing to the five deciles from 5 to 9 is rather uniform across different countries (Palma 2011: 19).

  25. 25.

    On the various explanations for secular stagnation, see Baldwin and Teulings (2014). Backhouse and Boianovsky (2016) describe the origin of the term.

  26. 26.

    Galbraith (2017) presents alternative views on the determination of the interest rate .

  27. 27.

    Many contributors to the secular stagnation book by Baldwin and Teulings have remarked that low interest rates in the financial centres and for highly rated types of assets can easily lead to financial bubbles because of the search for high yields in emerging and marginal markets.

  28. 28.

    Some emerging economies are now experiencing a decrease in their growth rates; Brazil, Russia and South Africa have had very low rates since 2012. Growth is slowing down in Indonesia, Turkey and in other emerging countries in East Asia.

  29. 29.

    Gordon explains ‘secular stagnation’ in terms of the slowing down of the growth rate of labour productivity , which in turn is determined by a declining pace of technical progress , thereby generating a reduction in potential output (Gordon 2015).

  30. 30.

    According to Solow , it is ‘time to rethink the way the credit mechanism mediates between savers and investors and puts credit to productive use’ IMF Finance and Development of June 2011: 51.

  31. 31.

    Piketty compares the USA and UK, countries with low saving ratios (just above 7%), with Japan, whose saving ratio was close to 15%.

  32. 32.

    Piketty seems to support the view that increased savings are due to demographic trends and to the so-called ageing society (Piketty 2014: 175).

  33. 33.

    Remember that Piketty’s notion of capital is not physical capital as in Harrod (see Sect. 1.1 above) but includes all types of assets and is similar to wealth.

  34. 34.

    Other counteracting factors are demography and technological change (Kuznets 1955: 8–9).

  35. 35.

    Both in the USA and in the UK, the goods balance is much more negative than the trade balance and the current account , because both countries are very strong exporters of services, namely financial services.

  36. 36.

    There are large differences within the Euro area: in 2018 in Germany and the Netherlands the current account surplus is close to 8 and 10% of GDP , respectively; other countries have either much smaller surpluses or small deficits. Between 2010 and 2018, Greece has been going through a financial crisis which bears many similarities to that of developing countries during the eighties.

References

  • Arcand, J.-L., Berkes, E., & Panizza, U. (2012, June). Too Much Finance? (IMF Working Paper No. 161). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality, What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse, R. E., & Boianovsky, M. (2016, December). Secular Stagnation the History of a Macroeconomic Heresy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(6), 946–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., & Teulings, C. (2014). Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures. London: A Vox.org/CEPR eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., Furceri, D., & Pescatori, A. (2014). A Prolonged Period of Low Interest Rates? In R. Baldwin & C. Teulings (Eds.), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures. London: A Vox.org/CEPR eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F. (2015). The Globalization of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R. J., & Farhi, E. (2014). On the Role of Safe Asset Shortages in Secular Stagnation. In R. Baldwin & C. Teulings (Eds.), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures. London: A Vox.org/CEPR eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J., & Grabel, I. (2004). Reclaiming Development, an Alternative Economic Policy Manual. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornia, G. A. (Ed.). (2014). Falling Inequality in Latin America: Policy Changes and Lessons. Oxford: WIDER Studies in Development Economics, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2013). The Great Escape: Health, Wealth and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurodad. (2014, November 10). UN Financing for Development Negotiations: What Outcomes Should Be Agreed in Addis Ababa in 2015. www.eurodad.org/ffdpositionpaper.

  • Furceri, D., & Loungani, P. (2015). Capital Account Liberalization and Inequality (IMF Working Paper 15/243). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (2017). Can Trump Overcome Secular Stagnation? Real-World Economic Review (78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbellini, N. (2018, January). Inequality in the 21st Century: A Critical Analysis of Piketty’s Work (INET Working Paper No. 69).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (2015). Seculars Stagnation: A Supply-Side View. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 105(5), 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2014). World of Work Report 2014, Developing with Jobs. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2011, June). Finance and Development. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. (2013). What Contribution Can China Make to Inclusive Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa? Development and Change, 44(6), 1295–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasahara, S. (2013, November). The Asian Developmental State and the Flying Geese Model (UNCTAD Discussion Paper No. 213).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2014). Four Observations on Secular Stagnation. In R. Baldwin & C. Teulings (Eds.), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures. London: A Vox.org/CEPR eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumhof, M., Lebraz, C., Rancière, R., Richter, A. W., & Throckmorton, N. A. (2012, January). Income Inequality and Current Account Imbalances (IMF Working Paper WP/12/8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955, March). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1963). Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations, VIII: The Distribution of Income by Size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11, 1–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., & Rey, H. (2006, December). Globalization and Emerging Markets: With or Without Crash? American Economic Review, 96(5), 1631–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2012, November). Global Income Inequality by the Numbers: In History and Now—An Overview. The World Bank—Development Research Group Poverty and Inequality Team (Policy Research Working Paper 6259). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2014). The Return of “Patrimonial Capitalism”: A Review of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.2.519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. P. (1974). The Modeling of Financial Instability: An Introduction. Modeling and Simulation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Pittsburgh Conference 5. Instrument Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. P. (1975). John Maynard Keynes. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, B., & Beker, V. A. (2015). Modern Financial Crises Argentina, United States and Europe. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). Development Co-operation Report: Data for Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J. D. & Berg, A. G. (2014, September). Measure to Measure. Finance and Development. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palley, T. I. (2016, April). Inequality, the Financial Crisis and Stagnation. Real-World Economics Review, 74, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2009). The Revenge of the Market on the Rentiers: Why Neo-Liberal Reports of the End of History Turned Out to Be Premature. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4), 829–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palma, J. G. (2011, January). Homogeneous Middles vs. Heterogeneous Tails, and the End of the ‘Inverted-U’: The Share of the Rich Is What It’s All About (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics [CWPE] 1111).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty. T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century (French ed., 2013). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press for Harward University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, H. (2013). Dilemma Not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence. Kansas City, MO: Federal Reserve Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, H. (2015, June). Interview in Finance and Development, 52, No. 2. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, I. I. (1929). A History of Economic Thought (1st Russian ed. 1929). London: Ink Links. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Making Globalisation Work. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. (2013). Global Poverty, Aid and Middle-Income Countries: Are the Country Classifications Moribund or is Global Poverty in the Process of ‘Nationalizing’? (WIDER Working Paper No. 2013/062). Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin, P. (2017). The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (1996). Trade and Development Report 1996. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2017). Trade and Development Report 2017. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaggi, G. (Ed.). (1993). From the Debt Crisis to Sustainable Development. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaggi, G. (2002). Economic and Financial Instability: Lessons from the Asian Crisis. In International Financial Systems and Stocks Volatility: Issues and Remedies. The International Review of Comparative Public Policy (Vol. 13, N. R. Sabri, Ed.). Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaggi, G. (2018, May). Development Finance in the Age of Financial Mercantilism (DEM Working Paper Series No. 157 [05–18]). Department of Economics and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, G. B. (2014). Monetary Policy Cannot Solve Secular Stagnation Alone. In R. Baldwin & C. Teulings (Eds.), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures. London: A Vox.org/CEPR eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Vaggi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vaggi, G. (2018). The Economy Strikes Back; Convergence, Divergence and Imbalances. In: Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54879-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54879-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54878-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54879-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics