Skip to main content

The Constitution of Value

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Economics
  • 623 Accesses

Abstract

Landscape value is dependent on the number and duration of experiences of it. People seek complex values from landscape: aesthetic quality, conformity with cultural norms and psychological propensities, diversity and stability of experience, and whatever arises from its familiarity. Knowledge of its existence may convey value to those not directly experiencing it. Contact with good landscape may also improve people’s productivity and health, and may be considered “good” for society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abello, R. P., & Bernaldez, F. G. (1986). Landscape preference and personality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adevi, A. A., & Grahn, P. (2012). Preferences for landscapes: A matter of cultural determinants or innate reflexes that point to our evolutionary background? Landscape Research, 37(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldred, J. (1994). Existence value, welfare and altruism. Environmental Values, 3, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, S. C. (1991). The aesthetics of landscape. New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, 456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowring, J. (2017). Melancholy and the landscape. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassley, P. (1998). On the unrecognized significance of the ephemeral landscape. Landscape Research, 23(2), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhyoff, G. J., Miller, P. A., Roach, J. W., Zhou, D., & Fuller, L. G. (1994). An AI methodology for landscape visual assessments. AI Applications, 8, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1757). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. London: Dodsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, T. W. M., & Price, C. (1986). Recreational congestion: Some hypotheses tested in the forest of Dean. Journal of Rural Studies, 2, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clamp, P. (1976). Evaluating English landscapes—Some recent developments. Environment and Planning A, 8, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, J. (1827). The shepherd’s calendar. Manchester: Carcanet Press (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dümpelmann, S. (2015). An introduction to landscape design and economics. Landscape Research, 40, 555–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoz, S. (2013). Landscape and identity. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 272–278). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiennes, C. (1702). The journeys of Celia Fiennes. Edited by Christopher Morris. London: Cresset Press (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, W. (1782). Observations on the River Wye, and several parts of South Wales …. London: Cadell and Davies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster, P. H. (1999). An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Journal, 18(1), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groening, G. (2007). The “Landscape must become the law”—Or should it? Landscape Research, 32, 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, R. (1996). Landscape and the metaphysical imagination. Environmental Values, 5, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. (2013). Perceptual lenses. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 43–53). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howley, P. (2011). Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics, 72, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, T., McKenna, R., & Fichtner, W. (2016). The feasible onshore wind energy potential in Baden-Württemberg. Renewable Energy, 96, 662–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, A. (2011). Beyond the view: Future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 353–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohsaka, R., & Flitner, M. (2004). Exploring forest aesthetics using forestry photo contests: Case studies examining Japanese and German public preferences. Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review, 57, 777–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). Change and innovation in the technology of consumption. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 56, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottrup, L., Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavsar, R., & Varela, E. (2014). Valuation of ecosystem services. In B. J. Thorsen, R. Mavsar, L. Tyrväinen, I. Prokofieva, & A. Stenger (Eds.), The provision of forest ecosystem services. Volume 1: Quantifying and valuing non-marketed ecosystem services. http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/publications/efi_wsctu_5_vol-1_en_net.pdf.

  • McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. J., & Viscusi, W. K. (1990). Discounting environmental health risks: New evidence and policy implications. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, S51–S62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, M. (1959). Mountain gloom and mountain glory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, K., Sangster, M., Gallis, C., Hartig, T., de Vries, S., Seeland, K. & Schipperijn, J. (Eds.). (2011). Forests, trees and human health. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordh, H., Hägerhäll, C. M., & Hartig, T. (2013). Urban nature as a resource for public health. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 296–307). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R. (1995). Conflict between ecological sustainability and environmental aesthetics: Conundrum, canard or curiosity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. (2004). Forest aesthetics, forest economics and ecological sustainability. In R. Döring & M. Rühs (Eds.), Ökonomische Rationalität und praktische Vernunft (pp. 111–128). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. (2013). Subjectivity and objectivity in landscape evaluation: An old topic revisited. In C. M. van der Heide & W. J. M. Heijman (Eds.), The Economic Value of Landscapes (pp. 53–76). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R. (1973). Is there a need for a new, an environmental, ethic? In Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, 1 (pp. 205–210). Sofia Press Productions Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, C., Webster, C., Pryor, M., Tang, D., Melbourne, S., Zhang, X. & Jianzheng, L. (2015). Exploring Associations between urban green, street design and walking: Results from the Greater London Boroughs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, E. L., Jr. & Metz, J. (1970). It seems possible to quantify scenic beauty in photographs. USDA Forest Service Paper NE-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. R. J. (2001). Beyond visual resource management: Emerging theories of an ecological aesthetic and visible stewardship. In S. R. J. Sheppard & H. W. Harshaw (Eds.), Forests and landscapes: Linking ecology, sustainability and aesthetics (pp. 149–172). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1987). Nonuse values in benefit cost analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 56, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M. (2002). Environmental ethics and policy-making (C. G. McKay, Trans.). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Neighborhood landscapes, democracy, and community. Landscape Journal, 20(2), 198–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. (2009). Cultural landscapes and Asia: Reconciling international and Southeast Asian regional values. Landscape Research, 34(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, I. (2013). Landscape and environmental ethics. In P. Howard, I. Thompson, & E. Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 450–460). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, J. F., & Huang, C.-S. (1991). Towards a landscape ecological aesthetic: Methodologies for designers and planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 21, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4(1), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. G., Loomis, J. B., & Gillman, R. (1984). Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Economics, 60, 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward Thompson, C. (2011). Linking landscape and health: The recurring theme. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward Thompson, C. (2016). Editorial: Landscape and health special issue. Landscape Research, 41, 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1964). Collective consumption services of individual consumption goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78, 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Price .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Price, C. (2017). The Constitution of Value. In: Landscape Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54873-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54873-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54872-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54873-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics